Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

That’s the idea, they would join the WAC, start football and play FCS with them until the conference makes the move. How did you get lost by that???

To be clear, in this scenario, UTA would no longer be a member of the SBC.

(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

Yeah I was referring to them joining the WAC with full membership.

(01-14-2021 07:47 PM)Usajags Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

That’s the idea, they would join the WAC, start football and play FCS with them until the conference makes the move. How did you get lost by that???

To be clear, in this scenario, UTA would no longer be a member of the SBC.

Oh, I didn't realize we were all okay with letting UTA go. If that's the case then, awesome.

(01-14-2021 07:52 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 07:47 PM)Usajags Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

That’s the idea, they would join the WAC, start football and play FCS with them until the conference makes the move. How did you get lost by that???

To be clear, in this scenario, UTA would no longer be a member of the SBC.

Oh, I didn't realize we were all okay with letting UTA go. If that's the case then, awesome.

If they decided to leave, not like we can stop them. I do think it’s a good option for UTA if they wanted to restart football with less demand then needing to go direct from zero to FBS.