(05-06-2020 02:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

Bingo...IMHO, he came off as a fool in that hearing...ranting and raving about some Hillary conspiracy theory and then basically saying he would be looking for payback.

Thanks for not taking the word of that dishonest troll that shall remain nameless.

The point is still valid Tom. The same level of DD and judgement should be employed for either case and it simply is not.

I will ask you straight away - If you were accused of being a rapist in front of a panel of people who have already found you guilty before you have even had a chance to defend yourself - HOW WOULD YOU RESPOND?

Would you say "oh golly gee - that isn't true - please, please believe me - I rest my case"?

That f-kin guy was teed up to get politically roasted and abused by all those self-righteous mother f-er Dems when he did nothing wrong. His entire career was on the line, his marriage, and his ability to walk in public. And you didn't agree with his "temperment". Those f-kin dems were ready to label an innocent man as a rapist for the rest of his life because of politics..........

HOW WOULD YOU RESPOND under similar circumstances and with all those things on the line - you know, assuming you were wrongfully accused?

(05-07-2020 07:14 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

Bingo...IMHO, he came off as a fool in that hearing...ranting and raving about some Hillary conspiracy theory and then basically saying he would be looking for payback.

Thanks for not taking the word of that dishonest troll that shall remain nameless.

The point is still valid Tom. The same level of DD and judgement should be employed for either case and it simply is not.

I will ask you straight away - If you were accused of being a rapist in front of a panel of people who have already found you guilty before you have even had a chance to defend yourself - HOW WOULD YOU RESPOND?

Would you say "oh golly gee - that isn't true - please, please believe me - I rest my case"?

That f-kin guy was teed up to get politically roasted and abused by all those self-righteous mother f-er Dems when he did nothing wrong. His entire career was on the line, his marriage, and his ability to walk in public. And you didn't agree with his "temperment". Those f-kin dems were ready to label an innocent man as a rapist for the rest of his life because of politics..........

HOW WOULD YOU RESPOND under similar circumstances and with all those things on the line - you know, assuming you were wrongfully accused?

I can't honestly say of course...but I know I don't have the temperament to be a SCOTUS judge, so...lol. Additionally, he was in front of a Senate Panel with more Republicans than D's, so it's not like he was going against a full firing squad out to kill him. And I can forgive much of his anger, but the HRC conspiracy he went with tipped the scale for me.

(05-07-2020 07:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Additionally, he was in front of a Senate Panel with more Republicans than D's, so it's not like he was going against a full firing squad out to kill him. And I can forgive much of his anger, but the HRC conspiracy he went with tipped the scale for me.

It was roughly half a firing squad. And they had already taken shots at him once, without killing him, so they took another round with a story that came across, to me at least, as totally made-up hail Mary.

I thought the HRC conspiracy stuff was a bit weird in that context, but not for someone enduring two rounds of public character assassination.

(05-07-2020 07:23 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Additionally, he was in front of a Senate Panel with more Republicans than D's, so it's not like he was going against a full firing squad out to kill him. And I can forgive much of his anger, but the HRC conspiracy he went with tipped the scale for me.

It was roughly half a firing squad. And they had already taken shots at him once, without killing him, so they took another round with a story that came across, to me at least, as totally made-up hail Mary.

I thought the HRC conspiracy stuff was a bit weird in that context, but not for someone enduring two rounds of public character assassination.

Ford may have been lying, but you can't just wish away the fact that she told several people close to her that it was Kavanaugh long before he was picked by trump. So it was hardly a last second hail Mary. Additionally, it's a well known fact that these things are quite often not reported by women for many years for myriad reasons you're surely well aware of.

(05-07-2020 07:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:23 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Additionally, he was in front of a Senate Panel with more Republicans than D's, so it's not like he was going against a full firing squad out to kill him. And I can forgive much of his anger, but the HRC conspiracy he went with tipped the scale for me.

It was roughly half a firing squad. And they had already taken shots at him once, without killing him, so they took another round with a story that came across, to me at least, as totally made-up hail Mary.

I thought the HRC conspiracy stuff was a bit weird in that context, but not for someone enduring two rounds of public character assassination.

Ford may have been lying, but you can't just wish away the fact that she told several people close to her that it was Kavanaugh long before he was picked by trump. So it was hardly a last second hail Mary. Additionally, it's a well known fact that these things are quite often not reported by women for many years for myriad reasons you're surely well aware of.

You are delusional and your candidate is a pedo rapist. Deflect all you want prog filth.

(05-06-2020 02:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

Bingo...IMHO, he came off as a fool in that hearing...ranting and raving about some Hillary conspiracy theory and then basically saying he would be looking for payback.

Thanks for not taking the word of that dishonest troll that shall remain nameless.

Oh you got me good.

Be honest Tom, you don't like me cause I call your bullsh*t.

(05-07-2020 07:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:23 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Additionally, he was in front of a Senate Panel with more Republicans than D's, so it's not like he was going against a full firing squad out to kill him. And I can forgive much of his anger, but the HRC conspiracy he went with tipped the scale for me.

It was roughly half a firing squad. And they had already taken shots at him once, without killing him, so they took another round with a story that came across, to me at least, as totally made-up hail Mary.
I thought the HRC conspiracy stuff was a bit weird in that context, but not for someone enduring two rounds of public character assassination.

Ford may have been lying, but you can't just wish away the fact that she told several people close to her that it was Kavanaugh long before he was picked by trump. So it was hardly a last second hail Mary. Additionally, it's a well known fact that these things are quite often not reported by women for many years for myriad reasons you're surely well aware of.

But long after the alleged event was claimed to have happened. And IIRC, also after his service on the Ken Starr investigation. So he would have been known to her as a person that she might want to tear down some day. It wasn't like they were contemporaneous or near-contemporaneous revelations. And the people she identified as able to corroborate didn't.

I see her as most likely thinking at some point, "Here is this guy I knew sorta in HS, and his views are contrary to mine, and he's on the way up, so maybe I could bring him down someday, so let me fantasize about how."

(05-06-2020 02:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

Bingo...IMHO, he came off as a fool in that hearing...ranting and raving about some Hillary conspiracy theory and then basically saying he would be looking for payback.

Thanks for not taking the word of that dishonest troll that shall remain nameless.

Um, he wasn't defending you Tommie.

(05-05-2020 08:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Good grief, people. We have videos and stills all over about Biden repeatedly touching women and young girls inappropriately in public. These incidents just corroborate the record that is already there.

Exactly. Only a blind man can not see that Biden is a lecher. Im betting that we are going to hear a steady stream of allegations going forward from women that he groped, sniffed and molested.

(05-07-2020 07:44 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:23 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 07:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Additionally, he was in front of a Senate Panel with more Republicans than D's, so it's not like he was going against a full firing squad out to kill him. And I can forgive much of his anger, but the HRC conspiracy he went with tipped the scale for me.

It was roughly half a firing squad. And they had already taken shots at him once, without killing him, so they took another round with a story that came across, to me at least, as totally made-up hail Mary.
I thought the HRC conspiracy stuff was a bit weird in that context, but not for someone enduring two rounds of public character assassination.

Ford may have been lying, but you can't just wish away the fact that she told several people close to her that it was Kavanaugh long before he was picked by trump. So it was hardly a last second hail Mary. Additionally, it's a well known fact that these things are quite often not reported by women for many years for myriad reasons you're surely well aware of.

But long after the alleged event was claimed to have happened. And IIRC, also after his service on the Ken Starr investigation. So he would have been known to her as a person that she might want to tear down some day. It wasn't like they were contemporaneous or near-contemporaneous revelations. And the people she identified as able to corroborate didn't.

I see her as most likely thinking at some point, "Here is this guy I knew sorta in HS, and his views are contrary to mine, and he's on the way up, so maybe I could bring him down someday, so let me fantasize about how."

You honestly think his work on the Starr investigation was well known to the general public? Dude, c'mon.

(05-07-2020 08:38 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 08:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Good grief, people. We have videos and stills all over about Biden repeatedly touching women and young girls inappropriately in public. These incidents just corroborate the record that is already there.

Exactly. Only a blind man can not see that Biden is a lecher. Im betting that we are going to hear a steady stream of allegations going forward from women that he groped, sniffed and molested.

Molested? I would not be looking for a plethora of those. And the other incidents are all pretty well known. His voters likely won't care short of some huge bombshell. Especially with the alternative having even less moral character.

(05-07-2020 08:22 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

Bingo...IMHO, he came off as a fool in that hearing...ranting and raving about some Hillary conspiracy theory and then basically saying he would be looking for payback.

Thanks for not taking the word of that dishonest troll that shall remain nameless.

Um, he wasn't defending you Tommie.

I did not say he was defending me. Try to keep up.