(05-05-2020 12:13 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 07:54 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Nope. The topic in this thread is Joe Biden. You are using another dose of whataboutism to deflect from the Joe Biden discussion.

Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

Where has he been denied any due process?

Anyone who makes an accusation deserves to have it heard, regardless of which side they are on. It's pathetic that you are incapable of even admitting the obvious double standard the media has applied to Biden vs. Kavanaugh.

His words in reference to trump. Not Kavanaugh. Try to keep up please.

(05-05-2020 12:20 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 07:54 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Nope. The topic in this thread is Joe Biden. You are using another dose of whataboutism to deflect from the Joe Biden discussion.

Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

Due process exists only if Joe is being tried in criminal court. Otherwise, in the world of politics and optics - Joe deserves to be judged in the "court of opinion" by the standards he professes by embracing identity politics and SJW ideals.

Fvck his "due process" until he's literally being tried in criminal court. Your hypocrisy is lame.

Dude, YOU are the one who brought up due process, not me.

(05-05-2020 12:44 PM)memtigbb Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 07:54 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Nope. The topic in this thread is Joe Biden. You are using another dose of whataboutism to deflect from the Joe Biden discussion.

Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

So you want to sit here and honestly say you do not believe Groper Joe put his hands on this woman in a way she did not want him to?

Yes or no question.

First of all, THIS "woman" was allegedly 14 and Joe was not even at the event she claims it happened at, not to mention her allegation is of a comment and not physical contact, right?

Second, Joe's a creep and has touched and said inappropriate things to many women. I've never said otherwise.

(05-05-2020 12:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 07:54 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Nope. The topic in this thread is Joe Biden. You are using another dose of whataboutism to deflect from the Joe Biden discussion.

Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?
Lame excuse.

I haven't seen anyone seeking to deny due process for Joe--except maybe the left, who want it to go away without any investigation.

I'm for an investigation.
Joe himself asked for Congressional records regarding it (Reade).
John Oliver brought it up Sunday night (about Reade) and said he'd have more to follow.

(05-05-2020 01:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?
Lame excuse.

I haven't seen anyone seeking to deny due process for Joe--except maybe the left, who want it to go away without any investigation.

I'm for an investigation.
Joe himself asked for Congressional records regarding it (Reade).
John Oliver brought it up Sunday night (about Reade) and said he'd have more to follow.

Good for you. But Nancy just wants to dismiss it out of hand with, "That's not the Joe I know." My problem is that, based on a large volume of faux pas moments that have been captured on film or tape over the years, that kinda IS the Joe we know.

(05-05-2020 01:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:44 PM)memtigbb Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

So you want to sit here and honestly say you do not believe Groper Joe put his hands on this woman in a way she did not want him to?

Yes or no question.

First of all, THIS "woman" was allegedly 14 and Joe was not even at the event she claims it happened at, not to mention her allegation is of a comment and not physical contact, right?

Second, Joe's a creep and has touched and said inappropriate things to many women. I've never said otherwise.

Oops, I mixed up threads. I thought I was in the Tara Reade thread.

(05-05-2020 02:02 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 01:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?
Lame excuse.

I haven't seen anyone seeking to deny due process for Joe--except maybe the left, who want it to go away without any investigation.

I'm for an investigation.
Joe himself asked for Congressional records regarding it (Reade).
John Oliver brought it up Sunday night (about Reade) and said he'd have more to follow.

Good for you. But Nancy just wants to dismiss it out of hand with, "That's not the Joe I know." My problem is that, based on a large volume of faux pas moments that have been captured on film or tape over the years, that kinda IS the Joe we know.

Yes or No? Is there ANY evidence of Joe saying a woman had a nice ass or nice boobs anywhere in the public record? Or are they all just "hair sniffing", hugs, and shoulder touching?

(05-05-2020 02:27 PM)memtigbb Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 01:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:44 PM)memtigbb Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

So you want to sit here and honestly say you do not believe Groper Joe put his hands on this woman in a way she did not want him to?

Yes or no question.

First of all, THIS "woman" was allegedly 14 and Joe was not even at the event she claims it happened at, not to mention her allegation is of a comment and not physical contact, right?

Second, Joe's a creep and has touched and said inappropriate things to many women. I've never said otherwise.

Oops, I mixed up threads. I thought I was in the Tara Reade thread.

Saul Goodman!

(05-05-2020 01:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:13 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

Where has he been denied any due process?

Anyone who makes an accusation deserves to have it heard, regardless of which side they are on. It's pathetic that you are incapable of even admitting the obvious double standard the media has applied to Biden vs. Kavanaugh.

His words in reference to trump. Not Kavanaugh. Try to keep up please.

But I'm asking about Kavanaugh. Try to actually answer a question for once and quit deflecting, Captain Meteor.

(05-05-2020 01:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?
Lame excuse.

I haven't seen anyone seeking to deny due process for Joe--except maybe the left, who want it to go away without any investigation.

I'm for an investigation.
Joe himself asked for Congressional records regarding it (Reade).
John Oliver brought it up Sunday night (about Reade) and said he'd have more to follow.

Isn't it awesome when 95% of media and Hollywood shills for the left?

(05-06-2020 06:37 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 01:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:13 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

Where has he been denied any due process?

Anyone who makes an accusation deserves to have it heard, regardless of which side they are on. It's pathetic that you are incapable of even admitting the obvious double standard the media has applied to Biden vs. Kavanaugh.

His words in reference to trump. Not Kavanaugh. Try to keep up please.

But I'm asking about Kavanaugh. Try to actually answer a question for once and quit deflecting, Captain Meteor.

We're not allowed to deflect from the original thread topic according to our dad here, Hambone, so I can't answer and risk his wrath. Take it up with him.

So wait.. During the Kavanaugh hearings, it was brought up how his accuser was a big time Lib.. I'm pretty sure you were one of the ones that said nothing to see here.. Now this lady worked for Sanders and you're screaming foul..

Funny.. For a guy who claims to be independent and not voting for Biden, he sure is defending him mighty hard, he didn't even attempt to defend Kav.

(05-06-2020 11:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 06:37 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 01:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:13 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But no due process for Joe?

Lame excuse.

Where has he been denied any due process?

Anyone who makes an accusation deserves to have it heard, regardless of which side they are on. It's pathetic that you are incapable of even admitting the obvious double standard the media has applied to Biden vs. Kavanaugh.

His words in reference to trump. Not Kavanaugh. Try to keep up please.

But I'm asking about Kavanaugh. Try to actually answer a question for once and quit deflecting, Captain Meteor.

We're not allowed to deflect from the original thread topic according to our dad here, Hambone, so I can't answer and risk his wrath. Take it up with him.

Yeah, I figured. You've never honestly answered any question that's been asked of you. And I never really expected you to anyway. I'm not sure you're even capable of honesty.

(05-06-2020 11:16 AM)gdunn Wrote:  So wait.. During the Kavanaugh hearings, it was brought up how his accuser was a big time Lib.. I'm pretty sure you were one of the ones that said nothing to see here.. Now this lady worked for Sanders and you're screaming foul..

Funny.. For a guy who claims to be independent and not voting for Biden, he sure is defending him mighty hard, he didn't even attempt to defend Kav.

Oh Gunn... you must be new here.

Red didn't attempt to defend Trump Nominee Kavanaugh....

(05-06-2020 12:13 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Oh Gunn... you must be new here.

Red didn't attempt to defend Trump Nominee Kavanaugh....

And you likely did not advocate for Merrick Garland, so who the **** cares? I don't give two ***** who you defend much less demand it. But for some reason, I'm required to equally defend both sides?

I didn't defend Kavanaugh because I did not think he had the temperament necessary for the gig. Besides, I hate beer.

(05-06-2020 12:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 12:13 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Oh Gunn... you must be new here.

Red didn't attempt to defend Trump Nominee Kavanaugh....

And you likely did not advocate for Merrick Garland, so who the **** cares? I don't give two ***** who you defend much less demand it. But for some reason, I'm required to equally defend both sides?

I didn't defend Kavanaugh because I did not think he had the temperament necessary for the gig. Besides, I hate beer.

Seriously, you gonna bring Garland into this?? Garland was nominated by Obama who was in his lame duck term, and per Senator Joe Biden, the Senate doesn't have to approve it because it came from a lame President, I mean a President in his lame duck term.

You didn't defend Kav because you are a LIBERAL. Deny it all you want. But I vaguely remember that after that after she testified you basically said you believed her and Kav didn't deserve the spot, at no point do I EVER recall you or any of your ilk saying anything about his temperment.

You're a spineless dishonest troll. Say what you mean and mean what you say instead of talking out of both sides of your mouth so you can crawfish or deflect every debate.

I'm sorry that was harsh. What I meant to say is that you're a worthless piece of sh*t.

(05-06-2020 01:53 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 12:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 12:13 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Oh Gunn... you must be new here.

Red didn't attempt to defend Trump Nominee Kavanaugh....

And you likely did not advocate for Merrick Garland, so who the **** cares? I don't give two ***** who you defend much less demand it. But for some reason, I'm required to equally defend both sides?

I didn't defend Kavanaugh because I did not think he had the temperament necessary for the gig. Besides, I hate beer.

Seriously, you gonna bring Garland into this?? Garland was nominated by Obama who was in his lame duck term, and per Senator Joe Biden, the Senate doesn't have to approve it because it came from a lame President, I mean a President in his lame duck term.

You didn't defend Kav because you are a LIBERAL. Deny it all you want. But I vaguely remember that after that after she testified you basically said you believed her and Kav didn't deserve the spot, at no point do I EVER recall you or any of your ilk saying anything about his temperment.

You're a spineless dishonest troll. Say what you mean and mean what you say instead of talking out of both sides of your mouth so you can crawfish or deflect every debate.

I'm sorry that was harsh. What I meant to say is that you're a worthless piece of sh*t.

He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 01:53 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 12:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 12:13 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Oh Gunn... you must be new here.

Red didn't attempt to defend Trump Nominee Kavanaugh....

And you likely did not advocate for Merrick Garland, so who the **** cares? I don't give two ***** who you defend much less demand it. But for some reason, I'm required to equally defend both sides?

I didn't defend Kavanaugh because I did not think he had the temperament necessary for the gig. Besides, I hate beer.

Seriously, you gonna bring Garland into this?? Garland was nominated by Obama who was in his lame duck term, and per Senator Joe Biden, the Senate doesn't have to approve it because it came from a lame President, I mean a President in his lame duck term.

You didn't defend Kav because you are a LIBERAL. Deny it all you want. But I vaguely remember that after that after she testified you basically said you believed her and Kav didn't deserve the spot, at no point do I EVER recall you or any of your ilk saying anything about his temperment.

You're a spineless dishonest troll. Say what you mean and mean what you say instead of talking out of both sides of your mouth so you can crawfish or deflect every debate.

I'm sorry that was harsh. What I meant to say is that you're a worthless piece of sh*t.

He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

That was AFTER the hearing, when Blassey or whatever her name was testified, several of the Libs including LDT was condemning Kav..

(05-06-2020 02:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  He did in fact make the argument about temperment and I called him on it. Actually he used the word "conduct".... Tommie didn't like the way Kavanaugh specifically defended himself to the Senate Committee on the rape charges.

I took issue with his position - Refer to post #37 in the link below

https://csnbbs.com/post-15639622.html#pid15639622

Bingo...IMHO, he came off as a fool in that hearing...ranting and raving about some Hillary conspiracy theory and then basically saying he would be looking for payback.

Thanks for not taking the word of that dishonest troll that shall remain nameless.

(05-05-2020 01:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 12:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 10:09 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(05-05-2020 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I missed your promoting of that hashtag on the thread I started on trump's accusers. Perhaps you can link it for me?

Besides, I believe in due process when it pertains to the alleged accusers against Trump. I believe that people should be judged according to the standards that they are keeping. Biden bought into the identity politics, SJW antics, ANTIFA, BLM, etc. etc. It's only fair that Biden is judged by the standards he proposes for others. However...the MSM WON'T hold Biden to account.

But no due process for Joe?
Lame excuse.

I haven't seen anyone seeking to deny due process for Joe--except maybe the left, who want it to go away without any investigation.

I'm for an investigation.
Joe himself asked for Congressional records regarding it (Reade).
John Oliver brought it up Sunday night (about Reade) and said he'd have more to follow.

John Oliver? You should be banned for referencing him.