(07-16-2020 08:49 PM)smudge12 Wrote: (07-16-2020 08:40 PM)GotLabradors Wrote: (07-16-2020 08:24 PM)VB Monarch Wrote: Reading Florida reporting a 30% positivity rate for kids. OOOOOPS
Schools were the first thing closed. Kids have not been exposed to this virus at the same rate adults have been. They have been kept at home and protected since March. No one has any real data about this virus and its impact on kids. If you want to see how kids will be impacted by this virus, open the schools. The number of cases will skyrocket in short order no matter what protocols you put in place in the buildings.
Yup.
And even if we're not witnessing immediate health issues with most children, what reason is there to play Russian roulette with kids? And why risk it not knowing the long-term health issues at all.
These questions are in addition to playing a dangerous game with the lives of our nation's teachers.
And if it was an absolute certainty that kids, teachers and the rest of us were all in mortal danger, we of course go back into a total shutdown.
But we don't know that. The WuFlu is not the black plague. It is, by all appearances, comparable or perhaps a bit worse than a normal flu season, with some risk of long-term, lingering effects. No one is wishing that on anyone (unless you are among the political nihilists who wanted something - - anything - - to take down the Orange Idiot).
So why then default to the hysterical end of this spectrum? We've tried a shutdown, and it did not contain the disease. Another one won't do any better.
Kids need to be in school. You may have the resources to take care of your own children independently, but many do not. And another lost year of education, interaction and keeping tabs on kids who are potentially vulnerable outside of the school is an absolute must.
Teachers need to do their jobs. There are risks and burdens that come with that. I, for one, could not teach. Not because I am afraid of the flu but instead because I don't have the stamina to deal with children for more than 45 minutes in any single day. But if you choose to go into the teaching field, you'd better be able to do your job. Someone who is afraid to run into a burning building ought not be a firefighter. Someone who is upset by confrontation ought not be a lawyer. Someone who is unwilling to be around children ought not be a teacher.
So if this is not driven by a sick political desire to bring today's America to its knees, what is the basis for your insistence on wreaking this kind of damage on our schoolchildren? What makes teachers more special than the rest of us, that they can decide not to perform their own profession during a crisis? What data has convinced you that this disease is more dangerous than the "cure" you and the teachers' union is insisting that we inflict upon our nation?