Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
News Senate Peach Mints Thread
Author Message
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,739
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3188
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #1
Senate Peach Mints Thread
Quote:Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has announced on Monday that he is giving House Democrats’ impeachment managers and President Donald Trump’s legal defense team 24 hours each to make their opening arguments stretched over a two day period starting this Wednesday.

“The President and the House of Representatives shall have until 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 22, 2020, to file any motions permitted under the rules of impeachment with the exception of motions to subpoena witnesses or documents or any other evidentiary motions,” McConnell’s resolution stated. “Responses to any such motions shall be filed no later than 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 22, 2020. All materials filed pursuant to this paragraph shall be filed with the Secretary and be printed and made available to all parties.”

“Arguments on such motions shall begin at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and each side may determine the number of persons to make its presentation, following which the Senate shall deliberate, if so ordered under the impeachment rules, and vote on any such motions,” the resolution added.

“Following the disposition of such motions, or if no motions are made, then the House of Representatives shall make its presentation in support of the articles of impeachment for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours, over up to 2 session days,” the resolution continued. “Following the House of Representatives’ presentation, the President shall make his presentation for a period not to exceed 24 hours, over up to 2 session days. Each side may determine the number of persons to make its presentation.”

“Upon the conclusion of the President’s presentation, Senators may question the parties for a period of time not to exceed 16 hours,” the resolution continued. “Upon the conclusion of questioning by the Senate, there shall be 4 hours of argument by the parties, equally divided, followed by deliberation by the Senate, if so ordered under the impeachment rules, on the question of whether it shall be in order to consider and debate under the impeachment rules any motion to subpoena witnesses or documents. The Senate, without any intervening action, motion, or amendment, shall then decide by the yeas and nays whether it shall be in order to consider and debate under the impeachment rules any motion to subpoena witnesses or documents.”

“Following the disposition of that question, other motions provided under the impeachment rules shall be in order,” the resolution concluded. “If the Senate agrees to allow either the House of Representatives or the President to subpoena witnesses, the witnesses shall first be deposed and the Senate shall decide after deposition which witnesses shall testify, pursuant to the impeachment rules. No testimony shall be admissible in the Senate unless the parties have had an opportunity to depose such witnesses.”

The Senate will then vote on whether to convict or acquit the president on each article of impeachment at the end of the deliberations by the Senate.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer decried McConnell’s schedule, claiming without evidence that McConnell was trying to make it “much more difficult to get witnesses and documents” involved in the trial.

Schumer is making his claims in bad faith as he has previously dismissed the notion that witnesses should be involved in a Senate impeachment trial because they are supposed to be interviewed by the House, which did not call all of the witnesses in Trump’s case.

In 1999, during the impeachment of Democrat President Bill Clinton, a reporter asked Schumer, “You said that one of the reasons they didn’t call witnesses in the House was to accommodate Democrats. How do you respond to that?”

“Let me say this idea that they didn’t have to call witnesses in the House and they should call them in the Senate doesn’t make sense,” Schumer responded. “You call witnesses before a grand jury and you call witnesses before a trial. So, there were some on my side, I was not among them, but some on my side who argued strongly that they outta call witnesses and they resisted it every step of the way.”

“There has not been a good explanation why 60,000 pages of testimony was good enough for the House but isn’t good enough for the Senate,” Schumer continued.

Link

Some Democrat journalists seem to think they can appeal to the Supreme Court to force the Senate to do things a certain way.

But an impeachment is not an official function of the Judicial branch of government. The constitution grants the Senate exclusive control of that exercise.

The judge who presides over the case will HAVE TO accept whatever rules the Senate decides on.

_________

Quote:The group of House impeachment managers who will be leading the Democratic charge against President Trump this week are making some new demands. White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, who will be the president's lead counsel this week, they insist, is a "fact witness" and therefore must provide his "first-hand knowledge" about Trump's phone call with Ukraine immediately. They inform Cipollone of these demands in a new letter on Tuesday, just hours before the trial is set to begin.



"Evidence indicates that, at a minimum, you have detailed knowledge of the facts regarding the first Article and played an instrumental role in the conduct charged in the second Article," the seven Democratic managers write. "The ethical rules generally preclude a lawyer from acting as an advocate at a trial in which he is also likely a necessary witness."

The first Article of impeachment accuses Trump of abuse of power. The Democrats believe that Trump coerced a foreign power for his own political benefit during his phone call with Ukraine and that multiple witnesses raised their concerns with John Eisenberg, the Deputy Counsel to the President for National Security Affairs. Eisenberg reports directly to Cipollone. The Democrats add that they have evidence to suggest that Cipollone was also involved in the decision to shield the whistleblower complaint against Trump from Congress and the public.

Even if Cipollone does not take the witness stand, his status as an unsworn witness "risk seriously damaging the fairness of the trial," they reason, concluding that his dual roles as an advocate and a witness is grounds for disqualification.

The Democrats also voiced their complaints about Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's trial timeline.

"A White House-driven and rigged process, with a truncated schedule designed to go late into the night and further conceal the President’s misconduct, is not what the American people expect or deserve," they said.



Republicans push back and say the Democrats are the ones with the suspicious timeline, considering they were talking about impeaching the president practically since his inauguration.

"Democrats are simply trying to cover up for the fact that they can’t beat President Trump in an election," GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy's office charged Tuesday morning.

Link

So then Schiff shouldn’t be an impeachment manager, right? Since he could and should be called as a fact witness.
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2020 01:39 PM by CrimsonPhantom.)
01-21-2020 01:39 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ECUGrad07 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,974
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1464
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
Post: #2
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
So... let me get this straight...

Democrats are upset that Republicans want to depose any potential witnesses prior to having them called as witnesses?

Isn't that... you know... EXACTLY what Schiff and the Democrats did during the House impeachment hearings? Republicans weren't even permitted to be there! Those few who were allowed there weren't permitted to ask any questions. 01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle

What's the problem?
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2020 01:54 PM by ECUGrad07.)
01-21-2020 01:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,823
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
What’s worse
A rigged trial that acquits someone of a nonexistent crime or a rigged investigation that sends someone to trial?
01-21-2020 01:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EverRespect Offline
Free Kaplony
*

Posts: 31,122
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1159
I Root For: ODU
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
Boring...
01-21-2020 01:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,366
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #5
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 01:53 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  So... let me get this straight...

Democrats are upset that Republicans want to depose any potential witnesses prior to having them called as witnesses?

Isn't that... you know... EXACTLY what Schiff and the Democrats did during the House impeachment hearings? Republicans weren't even permitted to be there! Those few who were allowed there weren't permitted to ask any questions. 01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle

What's the problem?

That was Schiff's Star Chamber bunker.
01-21-2020 01:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,823
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
A certain radio talk show personality says politics is for the ugly who wanted to be actors. Schiff fits that description perfectly.
01-21-2020 02:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ECUGrad07 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,974
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1464
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
Post: #7
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
God, I can't listen to Adam Schiff. Turning it off for now.
01-21-2020 02:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,739
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3188
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
01-21-2020 02:03 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoodOwl Offline
The 1 Hoo Knocks
*

Posts: 29,300
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 4915
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
Post: #9
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
ho-hum. 'nother slow news day.
01-21-2020 02:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #10
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.
01-21-2020 02:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,650
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5053
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:03 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

+3
01-21-2020 02:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ECUGrad07 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,974
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1464
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
Post: #12
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

They just EVISCERATED Adam Schiff.

This is beautiful to watch.
01-21-2020 02:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,650
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5053
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

Is that a direct quote from the Clinton News Network or the Fake New York Times?
01-21-2020 02:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #14
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:45 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

They just EVISCERATED Adam Schiff.

This is beautiful to watch.

Yeah...keep thinking that. 03-rotfl

Did they even say one truthful thing beyond his name?

And all that pounding on the stand...I guess that made his point more valid.

Someone on twitter said it best...Cipollone went full infowars. 03-lmfao
01-21-2020 02:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #15
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

Is that a direct quote from the Clinton News Network or the Fake New York Times?

Soros...I'm on the payroll, remember?
01-21-2020 02:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,366
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #16
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
Dems still on fishing expeditions.
01-21-2020 02:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,366
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #17
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(01-21-2020 02:45 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

They just EVISCERATED Adam Schiff.

This is beautiful to watch.

Yeah...keep thinking that. 03-rotfl

Did they even say one truthful thing beyond his name?

And all that pounding on the stand...I guess that made his point more valid.

Someone on twitter said it best...Cipollone went full infowars. 03-lmfao

Tom always plays his bad poker hand with emojis. When he knows he has nothing.
01-21-2020 02:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ECUGrad07 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,974
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1464
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
Post: #18
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
"What is going on in these process is not to be confused with due process...because due process is designed to protect the person accused," Sekulow says.

"When the Russia investigation failed, it devolved into the Ukraine -- a quid pro quo, when that didn't prove it was bribery, maybe extortion or....treason," he says.
-------------------------------------------------------
Cipollone stands up and takes aim at Schiff directly: "They made false allegations about a telephone call, the President of the United States declassified the call and released it to the public -- how's that for transparency?"

He says it was "unprecedented" for a president to release a classified call with a foreign leader.

He then refers to Schiff's own interpretation of the phone call in a House hearing last year: "He manufactured a fraudulent version of that call," Cipollone says.

"Never before in history of our country has a president been confronted with this kind of impeachment proceeding in the House," he says.

"It's a partisan impeachment they've delivered to your doorstep in an election year," he tells the Senate.

"Some of you should be in Iowa... Instead we're here and they're not ready to go, it's outrageous. it's outrageous," he says.

He goes on to say that the Democrats want to remove Trump from the 2020 ballot.

"They're not here to steal one election, they're here to steal two elections," he says.
01-21-2020 03:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 49,205
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 3527
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #19
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

The WH lawyers were devastating. They absolutely destroyed and laid bare the weak politics driven star chamber House case in just a few short minutes. The reality? After the WH lawyers opening argument---its now clear to the American people that the House doesnt even understand what they did. A vote to impeach means you have overwhelming evidence that has proven to the House that the president has committed a crime. So, 33 days ago the House voted to impeach---claiming overwhelming proof----And what happens next---the House then is standing in the Senate with two articles (lol---neither of which is crime) and claiming they need more evidence to prove it (lol....then why did the House vote for impeachment claiming it had overwhelming evidence proving that the president committed a crime?).

Nancy and Schiff are proving to be the biggest morons on earth. You know its bad when even CNN anchors are asking---have the Democrats overreached?
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2020 03:08 PM by Attackcoog.)
01-21-2020 03:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ECUGrad07 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,974
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1464
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
Post: #20
RE: Senate Peach Mints Thread
(01-21-2020 03:03 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(01-21-2020 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  These WH lawyers are beyond pathetic.

History, and legal scholars, will not be kind.

They absolutely destroyed and laid bare the weak politics driven star chamber House case in just a few short minutes. The reality---the House doesnt even understand what they did. A vote to impeach means you have overwhelming evidence that has proven to the House that the president has committed a crime. And what happens next---the House then is standing in the Senate with two articles (lol---neither of which is crime) and claiming they need more evidence to prove it (lol....then why did the House vote for impeachment claiming it had overwhelming evidence proving that the president committed a crime?). Nancy and Schiff are proving to be the biggest morons on earth. You know its bad when even CNN anchors are asking---have the Democrats overreched?

04-cheers

Louder for the libs in the back!
01-21-2020 03:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.