(02-28-2020 02:29 PM)mrjoolius Wrote: Shoot for >12 turnovers.
I think you mean turnovers < 12.
(02-28-2020 02:41 PM)TribePride91 Wrote: According only to the stats, the Tribe was blown out at Drexel, at COC,at UNCW.
Agree with the thrust of your post. If there is any team that should not be
overconfident, it is W&M. However - and I am not looking at the stats but, rather, going from memory - I recall that the CofC game was close and competitive until about the last two minutes. Things just spiraled out of control after that and the double digit score may look like a blowout but in reality the game was not. Similarly, at UNCW, IIRC the final score was only 4 points so that is hardly a blowout. It looked really bad out there because of our failure to break the press but we actually made a decent comeback in the last 6-7 minutes (and didn't we even tie the game or briefly take the lead once near the 3-4 minute mark?). Anyway, not a blowout. (In fact,
ha ha, by definition that would be one of those "lucky" wins for UNCW, per Kenpom).
---EDIT---
Since memory can't always be trusted, I went back and looked at the CofC and UNCW road games. In the Charleston game W&M had its last lead at 13:03 but it was still competitive until about 7-8 minutes were left. That is when things spiraled out of control leading to the eventual blowout (yes, looking at the scoring, that would be a blowout). In the UNCW game, the final margin was 6, not 4 (it was 4 until 8 seconds were left when UNCW sank two more free throws). It was last tied at 13:37. Interesting that both games went bad at about the same time.
Also interesting that those last two free throws at the 00:08 mark moved the deficit from 4 to 6. So UNCW was "lucky" until those last seconds when they suddenly moved out of the "lucky" status into the "good" or "blowout" status that TITB prefers. Bolsters my point about the randomness of where a "lucky" win is determined and the very use of the word "lucky". To further point out the ludicrousness of it, just say that W&M inbounded the ball at the 00:08 mark with a long pass to Knight for a meaningless thunderdunk or perhaps someone wanted to try a long "Tot" shot and it went in .... then those 2 or 3 points would have moved the margin down to 4 or 3 points and, either way, the result would, again, have made it a "lucky" win for UNCW. So the use of the word "lucky" to describe wins of this margin is both a gross misnomer and, in my humble opinion, just plain dumb.