(07-24-2019 08:11 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Wow... Ratcliffe impressing me with REAL questions about DOJ policies.

"180 pages about crimes that weren't charged"..

Yep

Yep... the gameplan is definitely trying to go after Trump after his term of office is over. They know they've lost here.

Sheila Jackson Lee is so smart

Did Mueller actually prepare more than 20 seconds for this?

Any resident dems still hanging their hat on the now utterly exposed non-existent legal standard of "not, not guilty"?

effin Cohen... what an idiot.

Cohen trying to get Mueller to grant "hearsay" testimony.. Got to say Mueller didn't bite on that.

(07-24-2019 08:19 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Yep... the gameplan is definitely trying to go after Trump after his term of office is over. They know they've lost here.

Doubt it.... It'll go away if Trump loses the election or when he's done serving.

Chabot playing the democrat game now... Ehh.. not the smartest strategy Chabot. Want to go after FUsion GPS do it in another venue.

Wow, I was wrong actual questions being asked.

(07-24-2019 08:35 AM)fsquid Wrote:  Wow, I was wrong actual questions being asked.

But so far, the only reasonable arguments the Democrats can bring up/have brought up (and I'll give Johnson credit) are about Trump - Sessions and Trump - Mueller recusal arguments.

Trump asked Sessions to unrecuse himself... Sessions refused.
Trump asked Mueller to be removed/replaced... Refused.\

And that's the only argument that the Democrats have so far,.. and that's Obsturction of justice?

One thing is very clear, about the only thing Mueller seems to remember is when the President said anything about Mueller.

(07-24-2019 08:27 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  effin Cohen... what an idiot.

He's a clown. Cant wait to heckle him about Trump again at a Tiger football game like I did last year.

Mueller suddenly gets amnesia about who Comey is and anything he said about him.

John Ratcliffe using his whole time to laud Trump was funny, especially since he's rumored to be in the running for a white house gig.

Trump had a constitutional right to fire Mueller. Not obstruction. Someone else would have been appointed.

Mueller doesn’t come off as 100% ‘there’. He seems a little to old to handle this.

AND...I find it interesting that the only thing the democrats have is McGann’s testimony. Funny that the president gave them complete unfettered access to his White House lawyer, never claimed executive privilege, and they find something there to charge obstruction. Does anyone have any doubt as to why Trump never testified? This is the end of the witch-hunt for people with two brain cells to rub together.....

Have any of the Democrats come into the chamber on Acme roller skates with rockets attaches to them?

Jim Jordan just neutered Mueller.