This will be fun.

Why can't he just do the testimony by himself?

I suspect, and I won't be watching due to work, that there'll be a ton of democratic grandstanding like we've seen the last 2 years especially from those running for President.

(07-24-2019 06:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I suspect, and I won't be watching due to work, that there'll be a ton of democratic grandstanding like we've seen the last 2 years especially from those running for President.

**** the grandstanding will be on both sides. Over/under on direct questions asked to Mueller is 25

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I don’t think he or his ‘deputy’ will answer anything. Wouldn’t be surprised to see the two of them confer for a minute or two when asked questions by the republicans. Waste as much time as possible will be the play of the day. Political theater at its best.....

Today is the day!!! The day that:

MUH COLLUSION
MUH OBSTRUCTION
MUH RUSSIA
MUH DOSSIER
MUH ORANGE MAN BAD
MUH IMPEACH
MUH SDNY
MUH TAX RETURNS
MUH COMEY
MUH AVENATTI HAS THE GOODS

all gets brought to light and Hillary is declared POTUS by noon tomorrow!!!

That, or the Democrats make fools of themselves yet again just like election night, Kavanaugh hearings, and pretty much every other day of the week.

(07-24-2019 06:57 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(07-24-2019 06:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I suspect, and I won't be watching due to work, that there'll be a ton of democratic grandstanding like we've seen the last 2 years especially from those running for President.

**** the grandstanding will be on both sides. Over/under on direct questions asked to Mueller is 25

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

You think so? Lately it's been the blue side of the aisle. We'll see how it shakes out. Personally I think it'll be a dog and pony show.

So far Mueller dashing any of the dreams of any Democrats...

"Russia meddled in the 2016 election. The president did not conspire with Russians. Nothing we hear today will change those facts"

And the stammering and stuttering begins.

So far the investigation could not exonerate the President. That is obviously impossible and not the responsibility of a prosecutor.

Mach is already seeing this as proof of Trumps guilt just based on the leading questions of Nadler.

I'll talk slow, bwaahahahaha

First gotcha moment. I almost feel sorry for the old man.

Contradicting himself already

bahahahahahahaha

Train wreck. Will the Dems ask the same questions over and over?

We found 'insufficient evidence' of the President's culpability

Collins like a bulldog at the moment going after the collusion/conspiracy argument..

And Nadler just pretty much gave away the game plan: "Could the president be prosecuted after he leaves office"

To be perfectly honest I dont think Mueller could tell you if it was sunny or raining outside if he was looking up at the sky

Yikes.

You dems are gluttons for punishment.

Wow... Ratcliffe impressing me with REAL questions about DOJ policies.

"180 pages about crimes that weren't charged"..

holy shite

Congressman Ratcliffe vindicated

mueller, democrats and socialists BLOWN OUT