(07-08-2019 10:12 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Is that Jared kushner or the guy with the giant forehead posting under the alias anonymous? Now we know where you wackadoodles get your insane theories.

Wait and see. Look up Tony Podesta and you will see how sick the prog filth are. Defend his art collection and I will entertain ypur rantings about jared.

Background

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

Btw. There are plenty of links to Trump.

Stop putting Trump's name in the same sentence as his friend Epstein's NYC sex trafficking charges

It's not like Trump ran a NYC "modeling agency" featuring girls of unknown age dubiously trafficked from overseas and paid little to no wages at the same time he was an Epstein pal

Read this twitter feed Trumpkins......

Just because it's true doesn't mean we should keep repeating that Donald Trump has been accused of rape (in significant detail) by a 13 year-old, was known to barge into teen girls' dressing rooms at pageants, and has made inappropriate comments to/about underage girls on camera

I resent the fact that reporters keep mentioning Trump's peculiar ongoing affiliations with pedophiles like Epstein and George Nader when all that does is limit the amount of air-time they have available to note that Trump ultimately endorsed pedophile Roy Moore for the US Senate

And for the life of me I can't figure out why it's relevant that under-indictment sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein said of his friend and fellow child-rape accusee, "I want to set up my [NYC] modeling agency the same way Trump set up his modeling agency" (quote from MSNBC just now)

And for that matter, it seems unfair and piling on to at this moment note that there's an ongoing federal investigation into why so many of Trump's pals ended up in pictures with (or on the premises of) a Florida massage parlor owner whose employees appear to have been sex slaves

Candidly, I'd find the idea of a major Trump-Epstein connection more compelling (from an evidentiary standpoint) if someone could show me *any* evidence *whatsoever* that Trump named the prosecutor who signed an illegal non-prosecution deal with Epstein his Secretary of Labor....

Jane Doe vs. Trump

SDNY 2016

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov....32.1.0.pdf

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information
2
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 10
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto; Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
3

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 10
even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02, “’I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’' Trump booms from a speakerphone. ‘He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.’”), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.

Mach is on ignore, but I see six straight posts fro him in this thread with no comment. Talking in a vacuum, like sky screaming. Pathetic and partisan. Get help, you really need it.

Yep....... it’s a shame. The guy could shoot someone in Manhattan and wouldn’t lose his core supporters and he knows it.

Donald J. Trump thinks Bill Clinton was an innocent victims when women accused him of raping and having affairs with other women who are not named Hillary. He said the exact same thing about Roy Moore and himself. He also defended Epsteen of these things saying he was being railroaded. Why would Trump be where he is today? He knows once Epsteen gets his desserts, Trump would be protected in the White House. When the hammer falls, both Trump and Clinton would be charged with rape on a minor. Trump's own words convict him like he would have sex with his daughter, barging in on Ms. Teen girls while they were naked or half naked, and said to the parents of a girl that he would like to date her if she becomes of age.
Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Woody Allen, Trump's best buddy the murderous crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean-Luc Brunel (modeling company partner), famed attorney Alan Dershowitz (accused of raping a minor by a now grown woman along with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump), Prince Charles, Cyrus Vance, Harvey Weinstein, late Jimmy Savile, late Michael Jackson, Pete Townsend, Ken Starr later defend Epstein, There could be more. Trump is guilty since he knew what Epstein did in Florida that he banned him. Trump covered up a crime by not reported it to law enforcement. Trump is an enabler of Epstein.

(07-09-2019 12:11 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yep....... it’s a shame. The guy could shoot someone in Manhattan and wouldn’t lose his core supporters and he knows it.

I'm not a core supporter by any means. I did not vote for him in 2016 and probably won't in 2020 either.

But forced to choose for the presidency between a serial rapist and a communist, I'll vote for the serial rapist. And right now, that's the choice that the democrats appear to be forcing me to make. Trump is an offensive human being, so vote for the democrat. Why don't the democrats try finding a candidate who is not an offensive human being?

If you want me to vote for a democrat, give me a democrat like JFK or Harry Truman to vote for. That's not what you are offering.

Hell, i'd take Bill Clinton over anybody in the current democrat field. Then again, that may just be another permutation of the serial rapist versus communist choice.

(07-09-2019 03:58 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  Donald J. Trump thinks Bill Clinton was an innocent victims when women accused him of raping and having affairs with other women who are not named Hillary. He said the exact same thing about Roy Moore and himself. He also defended Epsteen of these things saying he was being railroaded. Why would Trump be where he is today? He knows once Epsteen gets his desserts, Trump would be protected in the White House. When the hammer falls, both Trump and Clinton would be charged with rape on a minor. Trump's own words convict him like he would have sex with his daughter, barging in on Ms. Teen girls while they were naked or half naked, and said to the parents of a girl that he would like to date her if she becomes of age.
Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Woody Allen, Trump's best buddy the murderous crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean-Luc Brunel (modeling company partner), famed attorney Alan Dershowitz (accused of raping a minor by a now grown woman along with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump), Prince Charles, Cyrus Vance, Harvey Weinstein, late Jimmy Savile, late Michael Jackson, Pete Townsend, Ken Starr later defend Epstein, There could be more. Trump is guilty since he knew what Epstein did in Florida that he banned him. Trump covered up a crime by not reported it to law enforcement. Trump is an enabler of Epstein.

Guess who fired Preet Bharara, guess who hired Geoffrey S. Berman who is in charge of the Southern District of New York? Donald J. Trump.

(07-09-2019 04:59 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 12:11 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yep....... it’s a shame. The guy could shoot someone in Manhattan and wouldn’t lose his core supporters and he knows it.

I'm not a core supporter by any means. I did not vote for him in 2016 and probably won't in 2020 either.

But forced to choose for the presidency between a serial rapist and a communist, I'll vote for the serial rapist. And right now, that's the choice that the democrats appear to be forcing me to make. Trump is an offensive human being, so vote for the democrat. Why don't the democrats try finding a candidate who is not an offensive human being?

If you want me to vote for a democrat, give me a democrat like JFK or Harry Truman to vote for. That's not what you are offering.

Hell, i'd take Bill Clinton over anybody in the current democrat field. Then again, that may just be another permutation of the serial rapist versus communist choice.

Mach must be back on break. I see his TDS hasn't lessened one iota.

For Courtney Wild, who said she was abused by Epstein when she was a young girl, the indictment was long overdue. Wild has been fighting for years, through a lawsuit against the Department of Justice filed in 2008 in which she is identified as Jane Doe #1, to make public the details of the plea deal with government prosecutors that many critics say allowed Epstein to evade justice.

Courtney Wild should be put into protective custody. I fear for her life. Individual 1’s life just got even more embarrassing. To think this is the President is mind blowing. That he has an 85% approval rating amongst Republicans is terrifying.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/wealthy-financ...ories.html

Court filings say the defendants. Individual 1 and Epstein raped Jane Doe 1. I have it linked above. Individual 1 can not be prosecuted while President thanks to the Justice Department legal interpretation. He is going to get more desperate.

(07-08-2019 10:30 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(07-08-2019 10:07 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-08-2019 09:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I have to believe that this could possibly be something that would get people off the Trump train. He could murder someone in the middle of Manhattan. He could conspire with Putin to win an election but please please for the love of God please denounce this pos if he’s found to be tied to this.


The truth is always stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

There is zero evidence of him doing anything you have listed....but what about those that are closely entangled on your side of the isle? Will you disappear for weeks on end or will stand like a man and admit your foolishness? I know your kind like the back of my hand. Your skin is gonna crawl and you will be so angry that he “got away with it” that you’ll even have more hate for him. It will eat you alive. Your life will be miserable and without joy. You will contemplate suicide or violence. You will be without hope......and then, like an angel from heaven a new article will appear in the huffpo declaring that Trump is selling babies to space aliens for food and your spirits will rise. Surely everyone will understand how horribly this is and now no one will still back Trump. But alas, the space aliens deny having anything to do with Trump and he skates again. Back into purgatory for ole Mach where he will have to wait for the next story that will surely be the one......

Why reply to Mach. His hate consumes his life. Nothing you post will get through that hate. It is his reason for staying alive in this world.

truEth

It's sad watching a man slide headfirst down a rabbit hole.

Yep.... that’s my mission.

The truth is stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.