(08-03-2018 09:42 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: (08-03-2018 06:09 PM)quo vadis Wrote: ESPN says Meyer now saying his BIG press conference denials were not correct, he admits he did know about 2015 abuse:
http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...zach-smith
Looks like he's going to trot out the "I accept full responsibility" (whatever that means) ploy ... the popular and effective modern day crisis management strategy. I bet it works.
The tweet Meyer sent out Friday is pretty bold. He concedes that he "misspoke", however you want to say it, at the B1G press conference, he did in fact know about the 2015 abuse allegations in 2015. But, he also says that not only did he know back then, he also Did the Right Thing and reported it as he was required to!
That itself raises some issues. First, it makes it harder for Ohio State to fire him "for cause" in a legal sense and thereby avoid paying him the whopping $40 million left on his contract.
Second, it also makes Ohio State look bad, because if Meyer did report the abuse allegations up the chain of command back in 2015 (and Zach Smith also said Friday that the Athletic Director knew of the abuse allegations then as well), then why was nothing done about it by the Ohio State higher-ups? Why was Zach Smith still employed for the next three years up until last week? The only plausible explanation is that these higher-ups investigated the abuse claims in 2015 after Meyer reported it but the investigation exonerated Smith - which almost beggars belief on both counts.
Third, it also begs the question of, regardless of what any higher-ups thought, why Meyer kept Smith employed the past three years after the 2015 abuse claims, when he'd already known about Smith and the 2009 abuse claims at Florida. I mean, you can kind of justify the 2012 hire by arguing that "well, everyone deserves a second chance" or something. But how can Meyer justify keeping him on after the 2015 abuse allegations?
Meyer's statement was clever in that it did what nobody really thought he would do - admit to not telling the truth at the B1G presser. But in then claiming he also properly reported it, it actually opens up a can of worms.
Those who said there were more layers of onion to peel were correct.