(01-28-2018 03:35 PM)appst89 Wrote:  New depths of sadness are reached by the left every day.

We have people on here who are no longer functioning human beings because of their TDS. I truly feel sorry for them.

The worst part is this is not a troll post.

Its an accurate depiction of what is going on.

(01-28-2018 02:58 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He’s fired or tried to fire everybody associated with investigating collusion with Russia. Just let Mueller finish the job. His head will be on a platter for this i am sure. His actions tell you he is guilty.

Well since you're always right.... I'll make a bet with you. If Trump is indicted I'm gone from here for 90 days. I can lurk but no posting in any of the rooms associated with the Spin Room. If Trump is not indicted, you get the 90 day ban.

I wonder why no response to this....

(01-28-2018 07:15 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 03:35 PM)appst89 Wrote:  New depths of sadness are reached by the left every day.

We have people on here who are no longer functioning human beings because of their TDS. I truly feel sorry for them.

The worst part is this is not a troll post.

Its an accurate depiction of what is going on.

(01-28-2018 09:17 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:58 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He’s fired or tried to fire everybody associated with investigating collusion with Russia. Just let Mueller finish the job. His head will be on a platter for this i am sure. His actions tell you he is guilty.

Well since you're always right.... I'll make a bet with you. If Trump is indicted I'm gone from here for 90 days. I can lurk but no posting in any of the rooms associated with the Spin Room. If Trump is not indicted, you get the 90 day ban.

I wonder why no response to this....

They are well aware its not going to happen and have been for a while imo. This is all really just attempted trolling.

(01-28-2018 01:35 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I don't care if he wanted to fire him or not. I think it is most likely fake news, but either way it is inconsequential.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Exactly.

I talk about firing my Wife and divorcing my kids all the time.
Have I? No.

Should I be impeached for a thought? Perhaps, I guess.

But alas, you can’t impeach the King of the Castle. I’m sovereign after all...

But yes, let’s start pursuing thought crimes. Good plan.

(01-28-2018 03:17 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 03:00 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:45 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

What if he did try to fire him? What statute does it violate? What statute would it violate if he did in fact fire him?

As I've said elsewhere, I'd be shocked and amazed that there had been no conversations about firing Mueller.

There's no longer an investigation of russian collusion. It's now all about, "what petty detail can I get someone to trip up on under oath so that I can then get someone convicted of something, anyone?".

So you no longer care about law and order? Don't care your president can't stop lying for a second to cooperate with an investigation? No longer care that they lie to cover a lie. You're team has come a long way from, nobody knows who hacked the election. It could have been the French or aliens. The lie is always evolving.

I guess if you call interviewing 20 people about a subject so that you can find where two of them told a slightly different story and then indicting one of them for lying under oath, then yeah, I'm against law and order.

Now, a question for you. Comey has revealed that he gave goverment documents to "a friend" to leak to the media so that a special prosecutor would be named to investigate Trump. We later learned that at least one of those documents was classified. Should Comey be investigated and charged? He's already admitted to the leak.

Under oath. And with hubris I might add.

(01-29-2018 10:26 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 03:17 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 03:00 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:45 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  What if he did try to fire him? What statute does it violate? What statute would it violate if he did in fact fire him?

As I've said elsewhere, I'd be shocked and amazed that there had been no conversations about firing Mueller.

There's no longer an investigation of russian collusion. It's now all about, "what petty detail can I get someone to trip up on under oath so that I can then get someone convicted of something, anyone?".

So you no longer care about law and order? Don't care your president can't stop lying for a second to cooperate with an investigation? No longer care that they lie to cover a lie. You're team has come a long way from, nobody knows who hacked the election. It could have been the French or aliens. The lie is always evolving.

I guess if you call interviewing 20 people about a subject so that you can find where two of them told a slightly different story and then indicting one of them for lying under oath, then yeah, I'm against law and order.

Now, a question for you. Comey has revealed that he gave goverment documents to "a friend" to leak to the media so that a special prosecutor would be named to investigate Trump. We later learned that at least one of those documents was classified. Should Comey be investigated and charged? He's already admitted to the leak.

Under oath. And with hubris I might add.

You won't get an answer cause team over country.

(01-28-2018 03:29 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Holy Moly Kenny Starr boys:


The former special counsel who investigated Bill Clinton has suggested President Donald Trump could be impeached if he had lied about considering dismissing Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Ken Starr, best known for investigating Whitewater and looking into Bill Clinton’s affair with then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky, said Trump’s denial of reports he attempted to fire Mueller could become an issue if they were indeed found to be untrue.

Speaking to ABC’s This Week on Sunday, Starr responded to a question about whether a lie about attempting to fire Mueller would be grounds for impeachment, stating: “I think lying to the American people is a serious issue that has to be explored. I take lying to the American people very, very seriously, so absolutely.”





He is a liar!

Aaaaaaand, there’s the pivot I predicted just last Friday, I think it was.

What did I caution about further rabbit holes?!?

Too freaking funny, you tinfoil hat clods.

ROOOSKIES!!! Collusion!!! Obstruction!!! He LIED!

Get the pitchforks and torches!!!


Hell, he’ll just pardon himself anyway... *coffee* /snicker

The left, getting mad for something that didnt happen...

(01-28-2018 05:41 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 01:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Are you guys so used to him lying to you you don’t care? You do realize how dangerous that this is no? We have a President that knowingly lies to the American public.


Where’s the outrage from the right?

He is a pathological liar?

Yes. We are all going to die because people like Lyin Hillary, "Spy like Watergate" Obama, Partisan Pelosi, and Slick Willy Schuemer---folks we all know never embellish and always tell the absolute complete and total truth--arent in power.

Its when the dems reach this kind of of frenzied hysteria that they reach their absolute maximum entertainment level.

Member when a Senate leader claimed Mittens had paid no taxes for ten years? Claimed such on the floor of the Senate?

I member.

Power is an intoxicating thing. The accumulation of it primary, the keeping possession, supreme.

(01-28-2018 09:17 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:58 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He’s fired or tried to fire everybody associated with investigating collusion with Russia. Just let Mueller finish the job. His head will be on a platter for this i am sure. His actions tell you he is guilty.

Well since you're always right.... I'll make a bet with you. If Trump is indicted I'm gone from here for 90 days. I can lurk but no posting in any of the rooms associated with the Spin Room. If Trump is not indicted, you get the 90 day ban.

I wonder why no response to this....

I noticed this yesterday and wondered if Mach would take you up on it. Ah, he's probably gun shy after the betting stuff with this past election. Plenty of Dems were willing to bet on that - and lost.

(01-29-2018 11:07 AM)Crebman Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 09:17 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:58 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 02:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He’s fired or tried to fire everybody associated with investigating collusion with Russia. Just let Mueller finish the job. His head will be on a platter for this i am sure. His actions tell you he is guilty.

Well since you're always right.... I'll make a bet with you. If Trump is indicted I'm gone from here for 90 days. I can lurk but no posting in any of the rooms associated with the Spin Room. If Trump is not indicted, you get the 90 day ban.

I wonder why no response to this....

I noticed this yesterday and wondered if Mach would take you up on it. Ah, he's probably gun shy after the betting stuff with this past election. Plenty of Dems were willing to bet on that - and lost.

I don't expect a response really... This isn't the first time I've offered it and he not respond.