CSNbbs

Full Version: When Trump cited the Mueller firing as fake news.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Are you guys so used to him lying to you you don’t care? You do realize how dangerous that this is no? We have a President that knowingly lies to the American public.


Where’s the outrage from the right?

He is a pathological liar?
(01-28-2018 01:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Are you guys so used to him lying to you you don’t care? You do realize how dangerous that this is no? We have a President that knowingly lies to the American public.


Where’s the outrage from the right?

He is a pathological liar?

Is this post about Obama? You could've said the exact same thing for the last 8 years.
(01-28-2018 01:27 PM)Jugnaut Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2018 01:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Are you guys so used to him lying to you you don’t care? You do realize how dangerous that this is no? We have a President that knowingly lies to the American public.


Where’s the outrage from the right?

He is a pathological liar?

Is this post about Obama? You can say the exact same thing for the last 8 years.

FIFY
(01-28-2018 01:27 PM)Jugnaut Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2018 01:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Are you guys so used to him lying to you you don’t care? You do realize how dangerous that this is no? We have a President that knowingly lies to the American public.


Where’s the outrage from the right?

He is a pathological liar?

Is this post about Obama? You could've said the exact same thing for the last 8 years.

Where was the outrage of "You can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan."??

Oh, your liar said it and knew it wasn't the truth, but because you always carried his water, it was okay......
Gullible Mach is why Fake News keeps putting out fake news. They know it will cause him to pee his pants in excitement and repeat it non-stop.
mueller is still there and the sham investigation is ongoing.

fake news
I don't care if he wanted to fire him or not. I think it is most likely fake news, but either way it is inconsequential.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
The alt-left floated this same story back in June 2017. Nothing with mueller has changed since then (he is still there, and his sham investigation is ongoing), and yet here we are again.

They are attempting to plant the seed that once corruption is exposed to the point that mueller should and will be fired with cause, that when Trump does it, he is obstructing justice.

Shame on the alt-left.
The alt-left keep bringing up a fake story that Trump is about to fire Mueller to try to create a firestorm ahead of all of the bad sh*t they are about to get nailed with.
So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?
Trump - like all politicians - lie. Show me a truthful politician. I have yet to see one.
If he tried to fire him, he'd be fired.
(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

There is no"trying" to fire him. If Trump says he's fired, then he's fired. He doesnt need to "try" to fire him. Noone can stop him. The fact that Mueller remains means that Trump didnt fire him, or try to fire him.
(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

He didn't when he was advised not to, according to the story, which may or may not be true, so what is the relevance?

He shouldn't have been appointed in the first place, so I would have no problem with him being fired except for the optics.
(01-28-2018 01:58 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

There is no"trying" to fire him. If Trump says he's fired, then he's fired. He doesnt need to "try" to fire him. Noone can stop him. The fact that Mueller remains means that Trump didnt fire him, or try to fire him.

So you were in the room. Got an audio recording?

If GTS keeps letting all these Russians hang around, his website will continue to be hacked and crash. 05-stirthepot
(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

Who cares? Trump has the right to fire him if he wishes. I wish he'd fired Comey on his first day in office. And there's still a chance he'll fire Mueller which will be fine for me. Not only is the man on a witchhunt and needs to be fired, your head will explode.

Win win.
Interesting.

It’s no longer about the truth. It’s about making the opposition angry. You guys are so dangerous to a functioning society.
(01-28-2018 02:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting.

It’s no longer about the truth. It’s about making the opposition angry. You guys are so dangerous to a functioning society.

The truth? Correct me if I'm wrong, but were you not a Hillary supporter?
(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

What if he did try to fire him? What statute does it violate? What statute would it violate if he did in fact fire him?
(01-28-2018 02:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-28-2018 01:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]So you guys think that Trump didn’t try to fire him. Yes or No?

What if he did try to fire him? What statute does it violate? What statute would it violate if he did in fact fire him?

As I've said elsewhere, I'd be shocked and amazed that there had been no conversations about firing Mueller.

There's no longer an investigation of russian collusion. It's now all about, "what petty detail can I get someone to trip up on under oath so that I can then get someone convicted of something, anyone?".
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Reference URL's