(01-03-2018 03:32 PM)hawghiggs Wrote: (01-03-2018 03:23 PM)Kaplony Wrote: (01-03-2018 03:20 PM)hawghiggs Wrote: (01-03-2018 02:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote: (01-03-2018 02:25 PM)Kaplony Wrote: Oh I'm sure he's like the others who propose this increase in theft in that he also supports paying people from the national treasury just for breathing via an assured income.
(01-03-2018 02:28 PM)hawghiggs Wrote: Fine with it. As long as we do away with Income tax and the IRS. Also would like to see a UBI and do away with the Welfare state. And feel free to trim a couple hundred billion from the Military.
See? Here's one.
Yes. Just like that great liberal Richard Nixon dreamed of.
The government paying someone for simply breathing via the national treasury is not the American way. Taking more of people's hard earned money is not the American way. It's socialism and you wear it well comrade.
F@ck You! No its not. Replacing the current system with a UBI is a much more effective way to abolishing poverty. No only that. But studies have shown that it would actually grown the economy over all.
What would you set the UBI at? $10,000 annually? $20,000? More?
Let's say $20,000.
If every person gets an additional $20,000 you realize prices will rise accordingly, right?
If you make $100,000 annually from your job and I only make $50,000 then giving us each an additional $20,000 doesn't make my pay equal to yours. You're still 50 grand ahead of me.
As prices rise, we're simply moving the poverty bar up. The poverty level is relative.
Where does the $20,000 given to everyone come from? Are we zapping all $$$ out of the welfare system?
If everyone received a UBI does that mean everyone would start paying taxes?
UBI is ridiculous. The concept ignores one glaringly obvious issue: Human Nature.
If I refuse to work today why would I be motivated to work if the government gave me money?
And if I refuse to work why should society reward my behavior?