(12-04-2017 10:51 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:44 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  accepting foreign assistance during the campaign with the promise of repealing sanctions for instance.

And if there were even a shread of that I'd be with you. But *every time* a "buckle up" moment happens it's a nothing burger.

Here's the thing. What material help could the Russians provide to trump that would require coordination with him? Let's say they were really "we want trump, let's flood social media"... They don't need to talk to him to do that.

Quote:But the point of an investigation is to, you know, investigate, so arguing that we don't know exactly what will be found is patently idiotic.

So it's ok for you to be investigated on the hopes we can find something, anything, to nail you with? There is a phrase for that "star chamber"

We know multiple people within the Trump campaign reached out to Russia for assistance, we know that there were contacts between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign concerning strategy, and we know at least one meeting took place in which both Russian sanctions and assistance to the Trump Campaign were discussed. We also known virtually every high ranking member of the Trump campaign has lied about those contacts. That's just what WE know, and there's this weird habit of not publishing all the evidence federal investigators have during an active investigation.

And he's not going on a fishing expedition, so that line of defense is nonsense.

(12-04-2017 10:53 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

No, you were called accurately criticizing a president for a false statement he shouldn't have made. It was literally the lie of the year per Politifact that year, so your claim that anyone pointing it out was called a "racist" is bullsh*t projection on your part. You should stop while you're visibly behind. Post less, read more.

(12-04-2017 11:11 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:53 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

No, you were called accurately criticizing a president for a false statement he shouldn't have made. It was literally the lie of the year per Politifact that year, so your claim that anyone pointing it out was called a "racist" is bullsh*t projection on your part. You should stop while you're visibly behind. Post less, read more.

So you're saying nobody out there was saying that most if not all criticism of Obama was based on racism... I think you're the one who needs to read more.

But lets spin this back.. Obama lied about health care and you're deflecting. The GOP's plan does not meet what you like and you despise them.

That's interesting.

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:06 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

That's a common problem with all "problems" for liberals these days. They're concocted nothing burgers. The NFL protest are another great example. They don't know what a solution or goal is. They just whine, cry, and act like juveniles wanting to get their way, but don't really know what "their way" really is. It's all a bunch of fabricated, "we're mad because she lost and we've been trained to hate" BS.

The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Lol.

And how exactly are they trying to hurt Mammy?

Could it possibly be worse than zerO care and the millions of households that scheme has wrecked?

How did mammy survive 5-6 yrs ago? I know many of us were FAR better off before this debacle.

Don’t you care about me and my chillins too?

/sadface

(12-04-2017 11:11 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:53 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

No, you were called accurately criticizing a president for a false statement he shouldn't have made. It was literally the lie of the year per Politifact that year, so your claim that anyone pointing it out was called a "racist" is bullsh*t projection on your part. You should stop while you're visibly behind. Post less, read more.

My, my.

In the spirit of the season

You really are an angry little elf, aren’t you?

(12-04-2017 11:07 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:51 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:44 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  accepting foreign assistance during the campaign with the promise of repealing sanctions for instance.

And if there were even a shread of that I'd be with you. But *every time* a "buckle up" moment happens it's a nothing burger.

Here's the thing. What material help could the Russians provide to trump that would require coordination with him? Let's say they were really "we want trump, let's flood social media"... They don't need to talk to him to do that.

Quote:But the point of an investigation is to, you know, investigate, so arguing that we don't know exactly what will be found is patently idiotic.

So it's ok for you to be investigated on the hopes we can find something, anything, to nail you with? There is a phrase for that "star chamber"

We know multiple people within the Trump campaign reached out to Russia for assistance, we know that there were contacts between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign concerning strategy, and we know at least one meeting took place in which both Russian sanctions and assistance to the Trump Campaign were discussed. We also known virtually every high ranking member of the Trump campaign has lied about those contacts. That's just what WE know, and there's this weird habit of not publishing all the evidence federal investigators have during an active investigation.

And he's not going on a fishing expedition, so that line of defense is nonsense.

I stop reading when you use a weasel word. in this case, it was "assistance". on the upside, it was much deeper into your post than usual.

Everyone (and I mean everyone) knows that the investigation is bogus, biased, and political. I find it amusing that anti-Trump texts found on an investigators phone is “news” or in anyway unexpected. My guess is that it’s actually far more likely to be the rule than the exception. Even as we speak investigators are rapidly deleting text histories as fast as thier fat liberal hate filled thumbs can move.

Close of business today to turn over the info on this weasel AND the IMO the complicity of the hubby of the McCalaughe backed (700 grand) failure of wifey McCabe, deputy director...

And, while we’re discussing “compromised”, how about this fired, hired by Bueller, stooge shtooping the help?

Leaking info to his”mistress” isn’t compromising the entire enterprise, even agency?

Swampity, swamp swamp swamp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(12-04-2017 11:27 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 11:11 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:53 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

No, you were called accurately criticizing a president for a false statement he shouldn't have made. It was literally the lie of the year per Politifact that year, so your claim that anyone pointing it out was called a "racist" is bullsh*t projection on your part. You should stop while you're visibly behind. Post less, read more.

So you're saying nobody out there was saying that most if not all criticism of Obama was based on racism... I think you're the one who needs to read more.

But lets spin this back.. Obama lied about health care and you're deflecting. The GOP's plan does not meet what you like and you despise them.

That's interesting.

No, I'm saying that calling Obama a liar when he lied about the healthcare bill would not result in any claims of racism. That was a strawman, and its patently disingenuous to act as if any criticism on Obama was met with cries of racism.

As for your concern over my relative feelings towards Obama and Trump, what Obama said was a lie, should not have been said, and should be held against him. That being said, a lot of the ACA was needed reforms, and it expanded coverage to tens of millions of people like was promised. So while the statement you're quoting was a lie by Obama, the bill itself was similar to what what promised, albeit flawed.

Compare that to the GOP healthcare bill that Trump championed, which did virtually none of what he campaigned on, would have resulted in millions of the most needy people losing their healthcare.

(12-04-2017 12:00 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Everyone (and I mean everyone) knows that the investigation is bogus, biased, and political. I find it amusing that anti-Trump texts found on an investigators phone is “news” or in anyway unexpected. My guess is that it’s actually far more likely to be the rule than the exception. Even as we speak investigators are rapidly deleting text histories as fast as thier fat liberal hate filled thumbs can move.

Oh well if you really mean everyone then I guess its settled.

(12-04-2017 11:52 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 11:07 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:51 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:44 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  accepting foreign assistance during the campaign with the promise of repealing sanctions for instance.

And if there were even a shread of that I'd be with you. But *every time* a "buckle up" moment happens it's a nothing burger.

Here's the thing. What material help could the Russians provide to trump that would require coordination with him? Let's say they were really "we want trump, let's flood social media"... They don't need to talk to him to do that.

Quote:But the point of an investigation is to, you know, investigate, so arguing that we don't know exactly what will be found is patently idiotic.

So it's ok for you to be investigated on the hopes we can find something, anything, to nail you with? There is a phrase for that "star chamber"

We know multiple people within the Trump campaign reached out to Russia for assistance, we know that there were contacts between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign concerning strategy, and we know at least one meeting took place in which both Russian sanctions and assistance to the Trump Campaign were discussed. We also known virtually every high ranking member of the Trump campaign has lied about those contacts. That's just what WE know, and there's this weird habit of not publishing all the evidence federal investigators have during an active investigation.

And he's not going on a fishing expedition, so that line of defense is nonsense.

I stop reading when you use a weasel word. in this case, it was "assistance". on the upside, it was much deeper into your post than usual.

So you mean you have no legitimate criticism of my point? Gotcha.

(12-04-2017 11:41 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:06 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

That's a common problem with all "problems" for liberals these days. They're concocted nothing burgers. The NFL protest are another great example. They don't know what a solution or goal is. They just whine, cry, and act like juveniles wanting to get their way, but don't really know what "their way" really is. It's all a bunch of fabricated, "we're mad because she lost and we've been trained to hate" BS.

The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Lol.

And how exactly are they trying to hurt Mammy?

Could it possibly be worse than zerO care and the millions of households that scheme has wrecked?

How did mammy survive 5-6 yrs ago? I know many of us were FAR better off before this debacle.

Don’t you care about me and my chillins too?

/sadface

Yes, it would be far worse than the ACA, literally every single major medical and hospital association agree on that fact. Seriously, look one up, and research their findings. You won't, but you could if you actually cared.

Don't worry though, despite you being an utterly small and childish person, I'd fully support any legislation which leads to better care for you "chillins". But short of being an insensitive ******* who added nothing to this thread, per usual, what's your point?

(12-04-2017 12:41 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 11:41 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:06 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

That's a common problem with all "problems" for liberals these days. They're concocted nothing burgers. The NFL protest are another great example. They don't know what a solution or goal is. They just whine, cry, and act like juveniles wanting to get their way, but don't really know what "their way" really is. It's all a bunch of fabricated, "we're mad because she lost and we've been trained to hate" BS.

The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Lol.

And how exactly are they trying to hurt Mammy?

Could it possibly be worse than zerO care and the millions of households that scheme has wrecked?

How did mammy survive 5-6 yrs ago? I know many of us were FAR better off before this debacle.

Don’t you care about me and my chillins too?

/sadface

Yes, it would be far worse than the ACA, literally every single major medical and hospital association agree on that fact. Seriously, look one up, and research their findings. You won't, but you could if you actually cared.

Don't worry though, despite you being an utterly small and childish person, I'd fully support any legislation which leads to better care for you "chillins". But short of being an insensitive ******* who added nothing to this thread, per usual, what's your point?

As someone who works in health care finance in legitimately interested in how the proposed law would have impacted your family if you don't mind sharing