(12-03-2017 10:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

So Trump did the ethical thing by firing Flynn and Bannon?

Begrudgingly.

And there it is,,,,

(12-03-2017 05:26 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

And there it is,,,,

Yes, there is an image macro.

Just one question, who's stopping a Clinton investigation from happening now? If it's so clear she's a criminal, and only a biased administration could keep her out of jail, why isn't that changing now? Just kidding, all the adults in the room know the answer, it's because he knows he can't prosecute her as he doesn't have the evidence to justify it. If he did, she'd be charged.

However, you don't need evidence to rile up your sh*tpost-loving base though, as you just proved.

(12-04-2017 08:34 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 05:26 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

And there it is,,,,

Yes, there is an image macro.

Just one question, who's stopping a Clinton investigation from happening now? If it's so clear she's a criminal, and only a biased administration could keep her out of jail, why isn't that changing now? Just kidding, all the adults in the room know the answer, it's because he knows he can't prosecute her as he doesn't have the evidence to justify it. If he did, she'd be charged.

However, you don't need evidence to rile up your sh*tpost-loving base though, as you just proved.

Did you not see the Comey statement listing all the things that Clinton could have been indicted for, but, "in his opinion", they didn't rise to the level of her knowingly breaking the law so he'd recommend no prosecution?

An investigation of Hillary today would only look like an attempt by Trump to distract from the current special prosecutor's investigation. Once that's cleared though, and I believe it will be in Trump's favor, I would love nothing more than to see him appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her basement server and so many other areas of her sleeze. Can you imagine a special prosecutor poking around in the Clinton Foundation fundraising activities, interviewing Bill Clinton and what's-her-name about the famous tarmac meeting where they discussed grand chillins? A special prosecutor digging around in the DNC's books looking at who they paid and for what as it related to trying to drum up Russian shyte on Trump?

It would be nothing short of priceless.

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

NSA, and devoted liar, Clapper?

Just a guess


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(12-04-2017 09:17 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:34 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 05:26 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

And there it is,,,,

Yes, there is an image macro.

Just one question, who's stopping a Clinton investigation from happening now? If it's so clear she's a criminal, and only a biased administration could keep her out of jail, why isn't that changing now? Just kidding, all the adults in the room know the answer, it's because he knows he can't prosecute her as he doesn't have the evidence to justify it. If he did, she'd be charged.

However, you don't need evidence to rile up your sh*tpost-loving base though, as you just proved.

Did you not see the Comey statement listing all the things that Clinton could have been indicted for, but, "in his opinion", they didn't rise to the level of her knowingly breaking the law so he'd recommend no prosecution?

An investigation of Hillary today would only look like an attempt by Trump to distract from the current special prosecutor's investigation. Once that's cleared though, and I believe it will be in Trump's favor, I would love nothing more than to see him appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her basement server and so many other areas of her sleeze. Can you imagine a special prosecutor poking around in the Clinton Foundation fundraising activities, interviewing Bill Clinton and what's-her-name about the famous tarmac meeting where they discussed grand chillins? A special prosecutor digging around in the DNC's books looking at who they paid and for what as it related to trying to drum up Russian shyte on Trump?

It would be nothing short of priceless.

You think the reason there is no investigation is because Trump is worried about the optics of attacking his political opponents? That doesn't even hold up to the slightest of scrutiny.

But keep imagining that investigation, because it's not happening. He's just stringing all of you along, complaining about how Clinton keeps getting away with being a criminal, all the while his own administration admitting they won't investigate her. Do you genuinely think he even has a basic grasp of the federal statutes she's allegedly run afoul? Put down the Kool-Aid and think for a minute about what you're saying.

(12-03-2017 12:25 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Coup to remove president.

It’s upsetting the swamp, that’s simply intolerable.

We all realize this is a multi-billion $$$ venture we’re talking about here, right?

Someone point me to near anyone in leadership not corrupted or compromised in this thankfully former clown car administration.

Start with the DOJ, and/or FBI...

Betcha can’t!

(12-04-2017 09:40 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 12:25 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Coup to remove president.

It’s upsetting the swamp, that’s simply intolerable.

We all realize this is a multi-billion $$$ venture we’re talking about here, right?

Someone point me to near anyone in leadership not corrupted or compromised in this thankfully former clown car administration.

Start with the DOJ, and/or FBI...

Betcha can’t!

The more he upends the Obama era, the more I hope he hangs on through this establishment-led (both sides) witch hunt to take him out. Because at this rate, he's getting my independent vote that he didn't get in 2016.

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

(12-04-2017 09:39 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:17 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:34 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 05:26 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

And there it is,,,,

Yes, there is an image macro.

Just one question, who's stopping a Clinton investigation from happening now? If it's so clear she's a criminal, and only a biased administration could keep her out of jail, why isn't that changing now? Just kidding, all the adults in the room know the answer, it's because he knows he can't prosecute her as he doesn't have the evidence to justify it. If he did, she'd be charged.

However, you don't need evidence to rile up your sh*tpost-loving base though, as you just proved.

Did you not see the Comey statement listing all the things that Clinton could have been indicted for, but, "in his opinion", they didn't rise to the level of her knowingly breaking the law so he'd recommend no prosecution?

An investigation of Hillary today would only look like an attempt by Trump to distract from the current special prosecutor's investigation. Once that's cleared though, and I believe it will be in Trump's favor, I would love nothing more than to see him appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her basement server and so many other areas of her sleeze. Can you imagine a special prosecutor poking around in the Clinton Foundation fundraising activities, interviewing Bill Clinton and what's-her-name about the famous tarmac meeting where they discussed grand chillins? A special prosecutor digging around in the DNC's books looking at who they paid and for what as it related to trying to drum up Russian shyte on Trump?

It would be nothing short of priceless.

You think the reason there is no investigation is because Trump is worried about the optics of attacking his political opponents? That doesn't even hold up to the slightest of scrutiny.

But keep imagining that investigation, because it's not happening. He's just stringing all of you along, complaining about how Clinton keeps getting away with being a criminal, all the while his own administration admitting they won't investigate her. Do you genuinely think he even has a basic grasp of the federal statutes she's allegedly run afoul? Put down the Kool-Aid and think for a minute about what you're saying.

Who cares about Clinton? The real crimes here were committed by the FBI. It's probably why Clinton keeps jumping up and down screaming "look at me!"

Clinton is small potatoes. The root of this is in the FBI and NSA.

(12-04-2017 09:39 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:17 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:34 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 05:26 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

And there it is,,,,

Yes, there is an image macro.

Just one question, who's stopping a Clinton investigation from happening now? If it's so clear she's a criminal, and only a biased administration could keep her out of jail, why isn't that changing now? Just kidding, all the adults in the room know the answer, it's because he knows he can't prosecute her as he doesn't have the evidence to justify it. If he did, she'd be charged.

However, you don't need evidence to rile up your sh*tpost-loving base though, as you just proved.

Did you not see the Comey statement listing all the things that Clinton could have been indicted for, but, "in his opinion", they didn't rise to the level of her knowingly breaking the law so he'd recommend no prosecution?

An investigation of Hillary today would only look like an attempt by Trump to distract from the current special prosecutor's investigation. Once that's cleared though, and I believe it will be in Trump's favor, I would love nothing more than to see him appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her basement server and so many other areas of her sleeze. Can you imagine a special prosecutor poking around in the Clinton Foundation fundraising activities, interviewing Bill Clinton and what's-her-name about the famous tarmac meeting where they discussed grand chillins? A special prosecutor digging around in the DNC's books looking at who they paid and for what as it related to trying to drum up Russian shyte on Trump?

It would be nothing short of priceless.

You think the reason there is no investigation is because Trump is worried about the optics of attacking his political opponents? That doesn't even hold up to the slightest of scrutiny.

But keep imagining that investigation, because it's not happening. He's just stringing all of you along, complaining about how Clinton keeps getting away with being a criminal, all the while his own administration admitting they won't investigate her. Do you genuinely think he even has a basic grasp of the federal statutes she's allegedly run afoul? Put down the Kool-Aid and think for a minute about what you're saying.

Would you agree that others have served jail time for having done less while mishandling classified information?

(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

That's a common problem with all "problems" for liberals these days. They're concocted nothing burgers. The NFL protest are another great example. They don't know what a solution or goal is. They just whine, cry, and act like juveniles wanting to get their way, but don't really know what "their way" really is. It's all a bunch of fabricated, "we're mad because she lost and we've been trained to hate" BS.

(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

Obstruction of justice looks like the big one right now for obvious reasons, but outside of that, I'd imagine Trumps books aren't nearly as clean as they should be so wouldn't be surprised at some sort of financial fraud.

That being said, your entire point is pretty silly tbh. Despite "collusion" itself not being a crime, there are plenty of crimes which could be described colloquially as collusion, like accepting foreign assistance during the campaign with the promise of repealing sanctions for instance. Lying to investigators to cover that up. Using funds known to have originate from foreign sources. etc/etc. But the point of an investigation is to, you know, investigate, so arguing that we don't know exactly what will be found is patently idiotic.

If the President wanted to "obstruct justice", he would have pardoned Flynn.

(12-04-2017 10:06 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

That's a common problem with all "problems" for liberals these days. They're concocted nothing burgers. The NFL protest are another great example. They don't know what a solution or goal is. They just whine, cry, and act like juveniles wanting to get their way, but don't really know what "their way" really is. It's all a bunch of fabricated, "we're mad because she lost and we've been trained to hate" BS.

The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

(12-04-2017 10:44 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  accepting foreign assistance during the campaign with the promise of repealing sanctions for instance.

And if there were even a shread of that I'd be with you. But *every time* a "buckle up" moment happens it's a nothing burger.

Here's the thing. What material help could the Russians provide to trump that would require coordination with him? Let's say they were really "we want trump, let's flood social media"... They don't need to talk to him to do that.

Quote:But the point of an investigation is to, you know, investigate, so arguing that we don't know exactly what will be found is patently idiotic.

So it's ok for you to be investigated on the hopes we can find something, anything, to nail you with? There is a phrase for that "star chamber"

(12-04-2017 10:47 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If the President wanted to "obstruct justice", he would have pardoned Flynn.

Oh, so there's only one way to obstruct justice? Let's see how well that argument holds up in court.

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

(12-04-2017 10:53 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

Havent you noticed, it only matters if the recipient is a democrat...

(12-04-2017 10:53 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:50 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  The GOP trying to pass a healthcare bill which would severely hamper my mothers medical care, after promising not to during his campaign, is not a "concocted nothing burger". Grow up, there are very real reasons to despise this man and the GOP in general.

Obama forcing my parents to lose their insurance plan and doctor, after promising they could keep their insurance and doctor, is just as despicable.

But if you said that in 2012/2013 you were called a racist

the obamites canceled millions of peoples' health insurance just so they could force them into the sh*tty coverage on the third world exchanges.

sick people literally died in the street like dogs because they couldn't get coverage after they were cancelled.