Is Obama and Clinton connected people (perhaps Obama himself) traveling the world telling both business and political representatives to ignore President Trump’s proposals and potential deals? Would that be considered working “against” America?
Would that be considered an illegal “backroom” deal?

(12-01-2017 11:43 AM)Dasville Wrote:  Is Obama and Clinton connected people (perhaps Obama himself) traveling the world telling both business and political representatives to ignore President Trump’s proposals and potential deals? Would that be considered working “against” America?
Would that be considered an illegal “backroom” deal?

I don't think so because I think they are now considered private citizens.

It would be the same as if you told your uncle in England not to invest in Subway.

No

(12-01-2017 12:11 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  No

I'm not a lawyer, but common sense frames your response......

does it make him a piece of shite????.........that answer is an unequivocal "YES"!

3 questions.

Are immunity deals by the FBI case specific? If someone tells the truth to the FBI in one line but lies in another, does that nullify the immunity deal in the prior case?
It’s a serious legal question.

(12-01-2017 01:18 PM)Dasville Wrote:  Are immunity deals by the FBI case specific? If someone tells the truth to the FBI in one line but lies in another, does that nullify the immunity deal in the prior case?
It’s a serious legal question.

I believe that is the case, yes. If you lie in any part of your testimony the deal is off entirely and you may well face all of the charges let go with the deal.

(12-01-2017 12:17 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 12:11 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  No

I'm not a lawyer, but common sense frames your response......

does it make him a piece of shite????.........that answer is an unequivocal "YES"!

The correct phraseology would be does it make him a BIGGER piece of shite.