Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Questions on the LA Chargers
Author Message
Brookes Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,256
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 128
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

The Parliament AwardsCrappiesDonators
Post: #41
RE: Questions on the LA Chargers
(11-22-2019 12:51 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(11-22-2019 09:31 AM)vandiver49 Wrote:  
(11-22-2019 02:29 AM)Transic_nyc Wrote:  Very well-researched article on the struggles of the Rams and Chargers in the Los Angeles market up to now. Here's the relevant point from the article:

Quote:But the Chargers have sold a weak 25,000 season tickets to date, and the Rams have sold a nascent 40,000, with the hope from both clubs that sales will improve after the stadium opens. "People are not going to spend a fortune on something they haven't seen yet," a Chargers executive says.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2811...os-angeles

I know Kroenke was angling for market share, but do you think Stan has any regrets about keeping the Raiders out?

I doubt it. The shortfall in revenue that exists because of the Chargers' very weak ticket and PSL sales is more than offset by the benefit that the Rams get by being the clear #1 team in the market instead of possibly being #2 if the Raiders were in LA.

I think this is right. Raiders fans likely still outnumber Rams fans in LA. There's a good point in the article about Raiders fans in LA buying SSLs in Vegas siphoning off potential Rams fans. I don't think that's exactly correct; Raiders fans (who have tolerated a lot of losing) aren't likely to change allegiance. But their kids might so this still presents a challenge. I'm impressed (but not exactly surprised) Raiders have collected double their expected SSL revenue.

And re the Chargers' revenue shortfall, my understanding is that even though they don't have a hard SSL revenue target they have to make up their share of the stadium costs in stadium revenue if there's a SSL shortfall. The article estimates their 15% share of stadium revenue at $600MM over 20 years. The shortfall at this point leaves them forfeiting on the order of 10 years worth of stadium revenue. I know they expect that gap to close but I wonder if it'll be significantly smaller. That quote above about not spending on what they haven't seen? That's definitely whistling past the graveyard.
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2019 02:30 PM by Brookes Owl.)
11-22-2019 02:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2019 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2019 MyBB Group.