(09-08-2017 07:09 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:01 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 10:26 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(09-06-2017 05:03 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  I don't take kindly to someone calling me a liar.

I can provide link after link after link concerning voter fraud. You know very well that it happens.

The left's argument against voter fraud used to be that it doesn't happen.

After proof was provided, the left revised its argument. Now they say there is no large-scale voter fraud. Of course, that in itself is trying to prove a negative. We won't know that the statement "there is no large-scale voter fraud" is false until we see evidence of large-scale voter fraud.



As far as that goes, the intent of my post was to reference the left's incessant tactic of pushing fake news. They are so rabid they knowingly make up false claims to use as their proof.


Did she get 3 million more votes? Who cares? She didn't get enough electoral votes.

Thankfully.

NO

The argument over voter ID is that it makes it more likely that millions of people will not vote which is many, many times more than the amount of illegal votes.

The the ends doesn't justify the means.

Prove it

He will as soon as UMBG proves that 3 million voted illegally in the 2016 election.

Prove they didn't.

MODS? May have permission to call this guy an idiot?

(09-11-2017 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-08-2017 07:09 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:01 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 10:26 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  NO

The argument over voter ID is that it makes it more likely that millions of people will not vote which is many, many times more than the amount of illegal votes.

The the ends doesn't justify the means.

Prove it

He will as soon as UMBG proves that 3 million voted illegally in the 2016 election.

Prove they didn't.

MODS? May have permission to call this guy an idiot?

Why'd you start asking all of a sudden?


I explained the point of my comment. You can't give it up.

And you're calling me an idiot.

(09-11-2017 10:45 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-08-2017 07:09 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:01 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Prove it

He will as soon as UMBG proves that 3 million voted illegally in the 2016 election.

Prove they didn't.

MODS? May have permission to call this guy an idiot?

Why'd you start asking all of a sudden?


I explained the point of my comment. You can't give it up.

And you're calling me an idiot.

Because. You. Can't. Ask. Someone. To. Prove. Something. Didn't. Happen! Geesh...it's not a hard concept.

The elections results proved it anyway. If you can't prove otherwise, those results stand as valid. No you give THAT up. If not, you deserve to be called things. C'mon man, just be honest!

(09-11-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 10:45 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-08-2017 07:09 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-07-2017 01:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  He will as soon as UMBG proves that 3 million voted illegally in the 2016 election.

Prove they didn't.

MODS? May have permission to call this guy an idiot?

Why'd you start asking all of a sudden?


I explained the point of my comment. You can't give it up.

And you're calling me an idiot.

Because. You. Can't. Ask. Someone. To. Prove. Something. Didn't. Happen! Geesh...it's not a hard concept.

The elections results proved it anyway. If you can't prove otherwise, those results stand as valid. No you give THAT up. If not, you deserve to be called things. C'mon man, just be honest!

It's called sarcasm.

I see you're consistent, though.

(09-11-2017 01:52 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 10:45 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-08-2017 07:09 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  Prove they didn't.

MODS? May have permission to call this guy an idiot?

Why'd you start asking all of a sudden?


I explained the point of my comment. You can't give it up.

And you're calling me an idiot.

Because. You. Can't. Ask. Someone. To. Prove. Something. Didn't. Happen! Geesh...it's not a hard concept.

The elections results proved it anyway. If you can't prove otherwise, those results stand as valid. No you give THAT up. If not, you deserve to be called things. C'mon man, just be honest!

It's called sarcasm.

No, sorry, it wasn't. But I'll take your goal-post movement as acquiescence though. So thanks for finally, sort of, manning up.

(09-11-2017 03:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 01:52 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 10:45 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-11-2017 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  MODS? May have permission to call this guy an idiot?

Why'd you start asking all of a sudden?


I explained the point of my comment. You can't give it up.

And you're calling me an idiot.

Because. You. Can't. Ask. Someone. To. Prove. Something. Didn't. Happen! Geesh...it's not a hard concept.

The elections results proved it anyway. If you can't prove otherwise, those results stand as valid. No you give THAT up. If not, you deserve to be called things. C'mon man, just be honest!

It's called sarcasm.

No, sorry, it wasn't. But I'll take your goal-post movement as acquiescence though. So thanks for finally, sort of, manning up.

I bet you're a peach to live with.

You don't know what's in someone else's mind. But you think you do.

Enjoy!

(09-10-2017 05:43 PM)WoodlandsOwl Wrote:  

(09-09-2017 12:44 PM)bullet Wrote:  Deaths confirmed or suspected over 70. One apparently in a hotel elevator.

http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/...181752.php

During Allison someone died in the BOA Building in a similar way.

That lady's elevator was flooded though.