(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:10 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

The mere suggestion that Hillary Clinton would make the best CIC should make us all go to the polls and leave the ballot for POTUS blank. We have literally scraped the bottom of the barrel of schit. This should say volumes about America and where it is heading.

It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

No, and I also didn't hear on MSNBC, HuffPo, Mother Jones, Salon, etc.

(01-28-2016 10:25 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  What an embarrassment. These guys in the debate are putzes.

Trump brings in a woman, any woman, to be VP and he is the next President of the United States of America.

haha tell that to John McCain

(01-28-2016 10:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:10 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

The mere suggestion that Hillary Clinton would make the best CIC should make us all go to the polls and leave the ballot for POTUS blank. We have literally scraped the bottom of the barrel of schit. This should say volumes about America and where it is heading.

It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

No, and I also didn't hear on MSNBC, HuffPo, Mother Jones, Salon, etc.

Bingo - Bull seems to be full of Bull at times (nothing personal). CNN hates Hillary.

(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:10 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

The mere suggestion that Hillary Clinton would make the best CIC should make us all go to the polls and leave the ballot for POTUS blank. We have literally scraped the bottom of the barrel of schit. This should say volumes about America and where it is heading.

It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

It was "the most prepared candidate ever... that was not a VP" Yes I heard that schit and I laughed.

(01-28-2016 10:34 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:25 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  What an embarrassment. These guys in the debate are putzes.

Trump brings in a woman, any woman, to be VP and he is the next President of the United States of America.

A Hispanic woman would definitely seal the deal. Maybe someone like Susana Martinez but I doubt she would go for it.

I'm trying to figure out if any of the candidates would accept VP under Trump. Maybe Cruz would.

(01-28-2016 10:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:10 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

The mere suggestion that Hillary Clinton would make the best CIC should make us all go to the polls and leave the ballot for POTUS blank. We have literally scraped the bottom of the barrel of schit. This should say volumes about America and where it is heading.

It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

No, and I also didn't hear on MSNBC, HuffPo, Mother Jones, Salon, etc.

Bingo - Bull seems to be full of Bull at times (nothing personal). CNN hates Hillary.

Did you watch the post debate panel?

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

Dafuq?

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(01-28-2016 10:25 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  What an embarrassment. These guys in the debate are putzes.

Trump brings in a woman, any woman, to be VP and he is the next President of the United States of America.

I have to agree. This debate was pathetic. Basically it was attack Cruz for 25% of the time. Rubio and Christie had nothing but canned answers. Carson wasn't making any sense whatsoever. Bush sounded halfway tolerable. Paul was the best of the bunch by a long shot.


Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(01-28-2016 09:45 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:37 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  What are the chances that the GOP uses this aa an excuse to "disqualify" Trump.

Better chance that I grow my dick by 2 inches tonight.

You Know They make pills for that..................Viagra !!!!!!

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

Hillary's "qualifications" are that she's Forrest Gump.

(01-29-2016 06:43 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

Hillary's "qualifications" are that she's Forrest Gump.

No , Her only Qualification is She has both a D and a V and a Multiple 2 timing spouse whom can't define Sex but He knows how to get it. Just Not from Her

(01-28-2016 08:54 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

Finished. Trump probably lost all respect for these losers and will pick a CEO to run the country.

Trump will not choose any of the career politicians.....hell, he may decide he doesn't want a VP and tell everyone to fk off....

he doesn't give a shite what the RNC thinks....he's going to rewrite the constitution (which needs serious help at this point)

that's a gimme.....

(01-29-2016 07:32 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 06:43 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

Hillary's "qualifications" are that she's Forrest Gump.

No , Her only Qualification is She has both a D and a V and a Multiple 2 timing spouse whom can't define Sex but He knows how to get it. Just Not from Her

only in a dark closet coming out of prison would she be an option at any level of thought....

(01-28-2016 11:27 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

Dafuq?

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

standard libtard rhetoric is all he displayed....they live in their own world w/o resolve or want of will....

now that the boomers are growing too old and the grandkiddies are diptards, trump is your guys only shot....

I only see the satire with the entire lot.....

(01-28-2016 11:22 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:10 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  The mere suggestion that Hillary Clinton would make the best CIC should make us all go to the polls and leave the ballot for POTUS blank. We have literally scraped the bottom of the barrel of schit. This should say volumes about America and where it is heading.

It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

No, and I also didn't hear on MSNBC, HuffPo, Mother Jones, Salon, etc.

Bingo - Bull seems to be full of Bull at times (nothing personal). CNN hates Hillary.

Did you watch the post debate panel?

only the mentally insane would do something like that....

(01-28-2016 10:25 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  What an embarrassment. These guys in the debate are putzes.

Trump brings in a woman, any woman, to be VP and he is the next President of the United States of America.

that's about right.....

hell, pick a hermaphrodite to gain the ultimate sympathy vote....

what a fk'n joke all of this is.....

The ultimate swerve would be Trump naming Megyn Kelly as his running mate. Talk about knocking some people on their butt.

(01-29-2016 07:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 11:22 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

No, and I also didn't hear on MSNBC, HuffPo, Mother Jones, Salon, etc.

Bingo - Bull seems to be full of Bull at times (nothing personal). CNN hates Hillary.

Did you watch the post debate panel?

only the mentally insane would do something like that....

It's was disgusting.

(01-29-2016 09:18 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 07:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 11:22 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

No, and I also didn't hear on MSNBC, HuffPo, Mother Jones, Salon, etc.

Bingo - Bull seems to be full of Bull at times (nothing personal). CNN hates Hillary.

Did you watch the post debate panel?

only the mentally insane would do something like that....

It's was disgusting.

you've been 'confirmed' to this 'cabinet' ;P

(01-28-2016 10:35 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 10:10 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 09:57 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 08:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Depends on what Cruz does. If all he does is talk about Trump all night, he's done.

As for who should be his VP, it's Cruz or Rubio. I'd like to see Cruz, but it would probably make more sense to go with Rubio as he would help sew up Florida.

I think Cruz nailed it when he said the election is about who would make the best commander in chief. We all know that is Hillary. I just moved to Florida (Ft Lauderdale which is liberal). Curious to see what support Bush/Rubio has in Fl Primary.

The mere suggestion that Hillary Clinton would make the best CIC should make us all go to the polls and leave the ballot for POTUS blank. We have literally scraped the bottom of the barrel of schit. This should say volumes about America and where it is heading.

It's what the libs are going with. Did you hear on CNN when they called Clinton "perhaps the most prepared commander and chief ever" (or something to that degree)..

Yup CNN was selling that Clinton was more ready for the oval office than Washington (who in addition to leading our armies played a huge role in the constitutional convention), Eisenhower (who commanded the military in WW2), Jefferson (Was VP, SoS, Minister to France, Governor of Virginia, and wrote the Declaration of Independence).

Thats off the top of my head.

If we just go by credentials and diversity of government positions held, George H.W. Bush was probably the most prepared candidate since the early 1900s.

CNN is in Clinton's back pocket and everyone should know this by now. It should've been obvious back when the public seemed to unanimously agree Sanders bested her in the debate back in October (or maybe it was September) and yet CNN acted like it was a landslide win for Clinton.