(03-03-2015 11:26 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  See that's how slurs work. Just because you might not find it offensive others might.

Everything you post is offensive to me. do you have no tolerance, i tolerate you. PANTSUIT

Hillary clinton in a criminal that wears pantsuits.

(03-03-2015 11:29 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Again,

Do you read ERC? I have attempted to address your complaint in posts 90, 95,97,98. Why don't you take a look there sport. Btw did you find any links on the Isreali baby that you accused the Palestinians of celebrating?

Geez, you are just too easy....

Hillary Clinton joins Twitter, calls herself 'pantsuit aficionado'

Quote:Hillary Clinton has joined the Twitter universe, making her debut tweet Monday with a nod to the two guys who elevated her to rock-star status on social media.

In her profile, Clinton described herself as: “Wife, mom, lawyers, women & kids advocate, FLOAR, FLOTUS, US Senator, SecState, author, dog owner, hair icon, pantsuit aficionado, glass ceiling cracker, TBD…”

This time i will let Pantsuits rest my case.....

http://www.today.com/news/hillary-clinto...6C10264551

Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

(03-03-2015 11:36 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

I would say that I provided the best source possible. Of course Mach will still cry and whine. It is what he is. Really kind of pathetic and sad. Oh well, case closed.

(03-03-2015 11:39 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:36 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

I would say that I provided the best source possible. Of course Mach will still cry and whine. It is what he is. Really kind of pathetic and sad. Oh well, case closed.

It is disgusting that he suggests we should be banned for calling a criminal pantsuit. Those people want to silence us.

(03-03-2015 11:46 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:39 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:36 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

I would say that I provided the best source possible. Of course Mach will still cry and whine. It is what he is. Really kind of pathetic and sad. Oh well, case closed.

It is disgusting that he suggests we should be banned for calling a criminal pantsuit. Those people want to silence us.

Since when have libs not been like that? Well, he hasn't responded to my post with Hillary claiming herself a Pantsuit Aficianado. About the best defense witness I could produce. I will give it to him, he provides good comedy here.

(03-03-2015 11:51 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:46 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:39 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:36 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

I would say that I provided the best source possible. Of course Mach will still cry and whine. It is what he is. Really kind of pathetic and sad. Oh well, case closed.

It is disgusting that he suggests we should be banned for calling a criminal pantsuit. Those people want to silence us.

Since when have libs not been like that? Well, he hasn't responded to my post with Hillary claiming herself a Pantsuit Aficianado. About the best defense witness I could produce. I will give it to him, he provides good comedy here.

He won't, nor will he be slapped for threatening to "turn us in". Gestapo tactics.

(03-03-2015 10:08 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  And the Benghazi investigations provides their first harvest. This is why you go on scavenger hunts.


Whitewater gave them Lewinsky and Benghazi will give them this.

That much smoke, there had to be a fire somewhere.

I don't know how pantsuits is a slur since she actually wears them. Is calling a college athlete a jock a slur?

(03-03-2015 11:55 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:51 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:46 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:39 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:36 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

I would say that I provided the best source possible. Of course Mach will still cry and whine. It is what he is. Really kind of pathetic and sad. Oh well, case closed.

It is disgusting that he suggests we should be banned for calling a criminal pantsuit. Those people want to silence us.

Since when have libs not been like that? Well, he hasn't responded to my post with Hillary claiming herself a Pantsuit Aficianado. About the best defense witness I could produce. I will give it to him, he provides good comedy here.

He won't, nor will he be slapped for threatening to "turn us in". Gestapo tactics.

I am sure he has flooded the mods with how evil I am. If it wasn't so sad, it really would be hilarious. Oh well, Pantsuits gave me all the defense I need.

(03-03-2015 02:10 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  I think Hillary is a good person with excellent experience.

Wow.

1. My neighbor is also a good person. He thinks the mailman is spying on him, but he's a good person.

2. She's been a trainwreck at every position she's held. Lane Kiffin's got excellent experience, too.

(03-04-2015 12:01 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 02:10 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  I think Hillary is a good person with excellent experience.

Wow.

1. My neighbor is also a good person. He thinks the mailman is spying on him, but he's a good person.

2. She's been a trainwreck at every position she's held. Lane Kiffin's got excellent experience, too.

Far fewer people on the left feel good about her today than they did yesterday.

(03-03-2015 11:58 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:55 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:51 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:46 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:39 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  I would say that I provided the best source possible. Of course Mach will still cry and whine. It is what he is. Really kind of pathetic and sad. Oh well, case closed.

It is disgusting that he suggests we should be banned for calling a criminal pantsuit. Those people want to silence us.

Since when have libs not been like that? Well, he hasn't responded to my post with Hillary claiming herself a Pantsuit Aficianado. About the best defense witness I could produce. I will give it to him, he provides good comedy here.

He won't, nor will he be slapped for threatening to "turn us in". Gestapo tactics.

I am sure he has flooded the mods with how evil I am. If it wasn't so sad, it really would be hilarious. Oh well, Pantsuits gave me all the defense I need.

Of course he is a massive thread derailer, then runs.

(03-04-2015 12:07 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:58 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:55 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:51 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:46 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  It is disgusting that he suggests we should be banned for calling a criminal pantsuit. Those people want to silence us.

Since when have libs not been like that? Well, he hasn't responded to my post with Hillary claiming herself a Pantsuit Aficianado. About the best defense witness I could produce. I will give it to him, he provides good comedy here.

He won't, nor will he be slapped for threatening to "turn us in". Gestapo tactics.

I am sure he has flooded the mods with how evil I am. If it wasn't so sad, it really would be hilarious. Oh well, Pantsuits gave me all the defense I need.

Of course he is a massive thread derailer, then runs.

He is a lib. It is what they do.

(03-03-2015 11:36 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Will Mach turn in Hillary to the mods? or will Mach run?

I don't think that's a violation of xx chromo-fancy-pants rules

He's only sticking up for a belief that is obviously the 'opposition'

....albeit, it's sometimes a tad wimpy....so what....nobody understands what I'm talking about.......or do they? (I notice things)

In premise I have to agree with him....

why does this board just select the weak leftists and attack? outside of the 'bully' aspect, I have no logical answer..... what else would you expect him or fit to do????? you ultra right wingers have zero ability to discuss at times....and I am hardly a leftist (and so fkn what if I smoke weed)

there are some pretty smart people on this board that can engage intelligently, ad-hoc, and with wit.....I can only imagine how many have been run off b/c the ultra right wingers feel superior....

I have easily learned more from this board than growing up in missippy.....and that's saying something.....you guys just don't know how yet.....

it's amazingly stupid to attack a 'side' just b/c they choose a 'side'....it shows only stupidity.....it ain't ignorance.....it's just damn stupidity....

some of yaz didn't read enough as kids and were only trained in a single home environment....sometimes, it's not your fault, nor theirs....

fixing problems can only be solved with equitable communication in this country......the others.....let 'em figure this shite out own

that's the entire point of this thread's "irony"

I'll quit now.....

(03-03-2015 11:56 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  I don't know how pantsuits is a slur since she actually wears them. Is calling a college athlete a jock a slur?

Are pantsuits even in style today? I'm not fashion conscious, so I don't know. Do most women wear them today?

"I don't know how pantsuits is a slur since she actually wears them."

Again it's derogatory in nature. Why is this a mystery? That's the question. Call her by her name. Her name is not pant suits. It's Mrs. Clinton.

2) Racism, sexism, heterosexism, religionism, and slurs are SEVERELY unacceptable. Period.


I know people like to cross a line every now and then. I get it, but calling her "pantsuits" does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to further dialogue. Go to the WWE and call her pant suits til your heart is content. I could care less, but here it's not just unacceptable. IT'S SEVERELY UNACCEPTABLE. Why are rules so hard for you guys to follow? It's offensive.

Now here's a little lesson for all of you. We can't change the past. We can only affect the future.

Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.
Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.
Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.
Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.Pantsuits.
Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.
Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.
Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits. Pantsuits.


Oh, and, fcking cnt too.

(03-03-2015 10:49 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Hell it might be even more secure than our govts and I'm serious.

I've pointed out before that you have no experience in the IC. Now you just demonstrate that you have no experience w/ intelligence.

And your comments are slurs.