Does she have any children?

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

Wow Chelsea in office.. I just creamed my britches.. Wait.. Nope.. Sorry..

(04-14-2014 02:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

I have no issue with the Bush twins...or any politicians kids for that matter...as it relates to their parents.

(04-14-2014 01:11 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:10 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  I bet if she has a Wikipedia page, then tommy will tell us she's qualified.

You are really quite ignorant aren't you? That isn't even remotely close to the point I made by posting the wiki page for Hillary. Try to keep up

Your problem is that you don't even realize that this is EXACTLY the point you made by posting the wiki page for hillary.

Once again fool...you know of nothing of which you speak. The comment by Owl was that she hasn't done anything. For someone who hasn't done anything, she sure has a long wiki page of things she's done. I was not judging the success or failure of those things, or even saying that doing those things made her qualified to be president. Especially since I don't believe we have any test that judges qualifications to be president other than what the Constitution says. I was just applying your standard of speaking to the actual words used by Owl...and not what he probaly meant...sucks when it happens to you doesn't it.

(04-15-2014 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 02:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

I have no issue with the Bush twins...or any politicians kids for that matter...as it relates to their parents.

But if you wanted more hot chicks in politics, it's a pretty simple choice, to me.

But then, maybe you found Molly Ringwald hot, as well.

(04-15-2014 10:29 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 02:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

I have no issue with the Bush twins...or any politicians kids for that matter...as it relates to their parents.

But if you wanted more hot chicks in politics, it's a pretty simple choice, to me.

But then, maybe you found Molly Ringwald hot, as well.

I guess extreme surprise was my reaction to anyone characterizing Chelsea Clinton as "hot" and I'm an old guy with lower standards.

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

hot chick my azz... .one of the ugliest, produced by two of the ugliest on the planet.

Would become another heinous looking dimocrat woman. Just look at the litany of that bunch ! !

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012...-well-duh/

(04-15-2014 10:29 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 02:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

I have no issue with the Bush twins...or any politicians kids for that matter...as it relates to their parents.

But if you wanted more hot chicks in politics, it's a pretty simple choice, to me.

But then, maybe you found Molly Ringwald hot, as well.

Seriously...you didn't?

Only good thing can think of concerning Chelsea Clinton is that she hasn't
messed up yet nearly as big as her mom.
Hard to make into a campaign slogan.

(04-15-2014 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Seriously...you didn't?

Tom, if it's ok for daddy to get a BJ in the oval office is it ok for Chelsea to give oral to an intern in her public office? How about a 10 on 1 groupie? Where do you draw the line?

(04-15-2014 10:41 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Seriously...you didn't?

Tom, if it's ok for daddy to get a BJ in the oval office is it ok for Chelsea to give oral to an intern in her public office? How about a 10 on 1 groupie? Where do you draw the line?

What in the hell are you talking about and what does it have to do with Molly Ringwald?

Falwell your question is so out of line I question your sanity.

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

Chelsea hot? Gross.

(04-15-2014 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:29 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 02:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

I have no issue with the Bush twins...or any politicians kids for that matter...as it relates to their parents.

But if you wanted more hot chicks in politics, it's a pretty simple choice, to me.

But then, maybe you found Molly Ringwald hot, as well.

Seriously...you didn't?

I was more an Jami Gertz man.

(04-15-2014 11:31 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Chelsea hot? Gross.

She is an attractive woman IMO. I see much less attractive women all over the place. "Hot" though should be reserved for exceptional cases and like "awesome" has become overused. Not every damn thing is hot or awesome.

(04-15-2014 10:29 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 02:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good...we need more hot chicks in politics.

You didn't strike me as a fan of the Bush twins.

I have no issue with the Bush twins...or any politicians kids for that matter...as it relates to their parents.

But if you wanted more hot chicks in politics, it's a pretty simple choice, to me.

But then, maybe you found Molly Ringwald hot, as well.

She was cute...not "hot" by any measure.

(04-15-2014 11:23 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Falwell your question is so out of line I question your sanity.

No, Billy was out of line and you carry his water for washing blue dresses.

So groupies in the oval office are cool, now? Thanks for clarifying.

Again JF, you're just plain ignorant. NO ONE is defending Clinton for his sexual endeavors or his actions with the Lewinsky affair. It was a black eye on him, the Democratic party, liberals, and our country in general.

What you're confusing is that we can still objectively assess his presidency without it and come to the conclusion that he otherwise did a pretty darn good job.