(01-09-2014 04:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:07 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:00 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Going to actually be interesting to see what does happen.
Considering today's ridiculous government interference with states rights,
wouldn't doubt Oklahoma having to put up a statue honoring Texas.

More appropriate if Oklahoma put up a monument to the Confederacy.

At any rate, this will be a long drawn out and expensive process, which will ultimately result in Oklahoma losing and the best part is that the government pays the court costs and attorney fees when they lose. Full employment for liberal lawyers in Oklahoma.

The Confederate Flag flies at the State Capitol building.

Didn't know that. Why didn't the NCAA prohibit all post season NCAA events like they did with South Carolina then?

(01-09-2014 04:40 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:07 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:00 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Going to actually be interesting to see what does happen.
Considering today's ridiculous government interference with states rights,
wouldn't doubt Oklahoma having to put up a statue honoring Texas.

More appropriate if Oklahoma put up a monument to the Confederacy.

At any rate, this will be a long drawn out and expensive process, which will ultimately result in Oklahoma losing and the best part is that the government pays the court costs and attorney fees when they lose. Full employment for liberal lawyers in Oklahoma.

The Confederate Flag flies at the State Capitol building.

Didn't know that. Why didn't the NCAA prohibit all post season NCAA events like they did with South Carolina then?

Because the Confederate flag in Oklahoma's case is part of a 14 flag historical display of all of the historical flags flown over parts of OK. In SC, its just the Confederate flag.

(01-09-2014 04:40 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:07 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:00 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Going to actually be interesting to see what does happen.
Considering today's ridiculous government interference with states rights,
wouldn't doubt Oklahoma having to put up a statue honoring Texas.

More appropriate if Oklahoma put up a monument to the Confederacy.

At any rate, this will be a long drawn out and expensive process, which will ultimately result in Oklahoma losing and the best part is that the government pays the court costs and attorney fees when they lose. Full employment for liberal lawyers in Oklahoma.

The Confederate Flag flies at the State Capitol building.

Didn't know that. Why didn't the NCAA prohibit all post season NCAA events like they did with South Carolina then?

It was approved by the overwhelming majority. Like Tom said, because they re branded it as a historical monument. This after one woman sued the state.

(01-09-2014 04:44 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:40 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:07 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-09-2014 04:00 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Going to actually be interesting to see what does happen.
Considering today's ridiculous government interference with states rights,
wouldn't doubt Oklahoma having to put up a statue honoring Texas.

More appropriate if Oklahoma put up a monument to the Confederacy.

At any rate, this will be a long drawn out and expensive process, which will ultimately result in Oklahoma losing and the best part is that the government pays the court costs and attorney fees when they lose. Full employment for liberal lawyers in Oklahoma.

The Confederate Flag flies at the State Capitol building.

Didn't know that. Why didn't the NCAA prohibit all post season NCAA events like they did with South Carolina then?

Because the Confederate flag in Oklahoma's case is part of a 14 flag historical display of all of the historical flags flown over parts of OK. In SC, its just the Confederate flag.

Like they used to say on some of those game shows, "Good Answer".