(09-16-2013 08:52 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:46 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I've said it a thousand times. This was the true agenda with the Obama Admin. He is not a democrat or a liberal. He is an enemy of our country. The goal was to divide and destroy. It's coming along as planned.

Lol. That's the goal of the wealthy elite! Not Obama! All the puppets you elect will have the same goal.

It's not really the wealthy elite. Usually they are just happy putting their name on hospitals, universities, and philanthropy. We very rarely elect truly wealthy people.

There's a special category of people that we elect and those they truly serve. I just don't quite know what to call them.

It's not that we elect wealthy people. It's that wealthy people "contribute" endless amounts of money to political campaigns, thus circumventing the democratic process. Politicians are in the pockets of the rich. Period.

(09-16-2013 08:57 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 08:52 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:46 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I've said it a thousand times. This was the true agenda with the Obama Admin. He is not a democrat or a liberal. He is an enemy of our country. The goal was to divide and destroy. It's coming along as planned.

Lol. That's the goal of the wealthy elite! Not Obama! All the puppets you elect will have the same goal.

It's not really the wealthy elite. Usually they are just happy putting their name on hospitals, universities, and philanthropy. We very rarely elect truly wealthy people.

There's a special category of people that we elect and those they truly serve. I just don't quite know what to call them.

It's not that we elect wealthy people. It's that wealthy people "contribute" endless amounts of money to political campaigns, thus circumventing the democratic process. Politicians are in the pockets of the rich. Period.

That's true.

(09-16-2013 08:57 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  It's not that we elect most government workers . It's that government workers "contribute" endless amounts of our money to wealth redistribution , thus circumventing the Constitution. Politicians line the pockets of the recipient class. Period.

FIFY

(09-16-2013 10:42 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 08:57 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  It's not that we elect most government workers . It's that government workers "contribute" endless amounts of our money to wealth redistribution , thus circumventing the Constitution. Politicians line the pockets of the recipient class. Period.

FIFY

Actually, a relatively small amount of federal government workers are involved in the redistribution of wealth. Most of them are just there to support endless studies that get nowhere.

But if you want to go with politicians lining the pockets of the recipient class, I'd agree. That recipient class includes people from welfare queens to Exxon, to big banks.

(09-16-2013 08:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:46 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I've said it a thousand times. This was the true agenda with the Obama Admin. He is not a democrat or a liberal. He is an enemy of our country. The goal was to divide and destroy. It's coming along as planned.

Lol. That's the goal of the wealthy elite! Not Obama! All the puppets you elect will have the same goal.

No sir. The wealthy elite have afforded you your way of life & the very computer you type on.

Ba-a-a-aa-a-a-aa-h. Bleat on, little sheep.

What would you do without rich people?

Complain about something else once that gravy train istaken away.

(09-16-2013 10:42 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 08:57 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  It's not that we elect most government workers . It's that government workers "contribute" endless amounts of our money to wealth redistribution , thus circumventing the Constitution. Politicians line the pockets of the recipient class. Period.

FIFY

Fixed? You reaffirm your stupidity.

Want to compare academic pedigrees, job titles, annual incomes? You will lose, badly.

And it is no surpise that you resort to a personal attack when your prepared taking points are inadeqaute to swing a conversation.

Carry on, comrade.

A civil war would be a slaughter since liberals don't believe in the right to bear arms. Just like a damn liberal bring a picket sign to a gun fight.

(09-17-2013 08:50 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  A civil war would be a slaughter since liberals don't believe in the right to bear arms. Just like a damn liberal bring a picket sign to a gun fight.

Isn't it just like a liberal not to think something all the way through? They go on emotion and not rational logic.

Bring it the Fck on. The ones I know are Pu$$ies.

Imagine a fight like "West Side Story" from the Left Progs.

If a Civil War were to break out, it wouldn't be a two way conflict. There would probably be a hundred different fights for different reasons going on at the same time. The blood bath would be something to see. Plenty of conservative and liberal children dead on the streets.

No one REALLY wants a civil war. Each side just wants the other to open their minds to their way of thinking, or use the power of government to eradicate it.

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

(09-18-2013 06:06 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  No one REALLY wants a civil war. Each side just wants the other to open their minds to their way of thinking, or use the power of government to eradicate it.

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

Both sides prefer the latter.

(09-18-2013 06:09 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(09-18-2013 06:06 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  No one REALLY wants a civil war. Each side just wants the other to open their minds to their way of thinking, or use the power of government to eradicate it.

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

Both sides prefer the latter.

Tru dat homey

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

(09-16-2013 04:12 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Meh, a civil war now would be political. Republicans would easily win, surely the mentals understand this.

Much like they win all national elections lately.. Oh what's that you say.. Dem's got more votes for the House, President and Senate?

(09-19-2013 11:57 AM)HuskieFan84 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 04:12 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Meh, a civil war now would be political. Republicans would easily win, surely the mentals understand this.

Much like they win all national elections lately.. Oh what's that you say.. Dem's got more votes for the House, President and Senate?

What ya gonna eat bro? Each other? Turns ya crazy quick.

(09-18-2013 06:09 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(09-18-2013 06:06 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  No one REALLY wants a civil war. Each side just wants the other to open their minds to their way of thinking, or use the power of government to eradicate it.

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

Both sides prefer the latter.

Yep...Elections are really simply nothing more than deciding who gets to use the force of government. Either way..YOU get the brunt of the violence.

(09-16-2013 07:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:46 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(09-16-2013 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I've said it a thousand times. This was the true agenda with the Obama Admin. He is not a democrat or a liberal. He is an enemy of our country. The goal was to divide and destroy. It's coming along as planned.

Lol. That's the goal of the wealthy elite! Not Obama! All the puppets you elect will have the same goal.

No sir. The wealthy elite have afforded you your way of life & the very computer you type on.

Ba-a-a-aa-a-a-aa-h. Bleat on, little sheep.

You have a way with defeat. Try not to make it so obvious next time.

(09-17-2013 10:22 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(09-17-2013 08:50 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  A civil war would be a slaughter since liberals don't believe in the right to bear arms. Just like a damn liberal bring a picket sign to a gun fight.

Isn't it just like a liberal not to think something all the way through? They go on emotion and not rational logic.

They're a few candies short of being Smarties...