How about one of you be honest and openly admit that your goal is to redistribute income? I would at least have some respect for your honesty.
I'm waiting.

(06-29-2012 11:41 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  How about one of you be honest and openly admit that your goal is to redistribute income? I would at least have some respect for your honesty.
I'm waiting.

Please explain what you mean by "redistribute income".

(06-29-2012 11:41 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  How about one of you be honest and openly admit that your goal is to redistribute income? I would at least have some respect for your honesty.
I'm waiting.

...and, sadly, the only one that answered happens to be one of the dumbest ones on the board.

(06-29-2012 12:35 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(06-29-2012 11:41 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  How about one of you be honest and openly admit that your goal is to redistribute income? I would at least have some respect for your honesty.
I'm waiting.

...and, sadly, the only one that answered happens to be one of the dumbest ones on the board.

One of the dumbest...?

(06-29-2012 12:35 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(06-29-2012 11:41 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  How about one of you be honest and openly admit that your goal is to redistribute income? I would at least have some respect for your honesty.
I'm waiting.

...and, sadly, the only one that answered happens to be one of the dumbest ones on the board.

That isn't true Torchy is the dumbest though you aren't far ahead of Torchy. I also didn't "answer". I asked him a question about his post.

So you admit that you don't understand that which you cheer for?

(06-29-2012 12:53 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  So you admit that you don't understand that which you cheer for?

I am trying to get to his meaning. My guess it is NOT something I cheer for but I want to be sure as to his meaning.

You don't understand what redistribution of income is?

Seriously?

Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

We have a taker folks

Who said anything to that effect around here?

(06-29-2012 01:18 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

Because I didn't take the mf'ers to raise? You don't enable people like that to produce. They'll eventually outnumber you and you'll think twice before having a family of your own because you're spending the brunt of your earnings someone else's gdamn family. Idiocacy in no time. RobertN is proof.

Please refer to this for my exact feelings on what you just said:

http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=576037

(06-29-2012 01:18 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

what's wrong with being selfish? owing it to yourself to maximize your potential? you're no good to anyone if you aren't good to yourself

(06-29-2012 01:18 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

What is funny is that those of Max's ilk think that if I have a job and if I'm actually successful at it, I'm taking from someone else. It is a zero sum game apparently.

Why don't you admit to your selfishness? You've stated on here that you want to fund your preferred social programs with someone else's money, but not yours. That sounds pretty selfish to me.

(06-29-2012 01:21 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(06-29-2012 01:18 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

Because I didn't take the mf'ers to raise? You don't enable people like that to produce. They'll eventually outnumber you and you'll think twice before having a family of your own because you're spending the brunt of your earnings someone else's gdamn family. Idiocacy in no time. RobertN is proof.

You are the one who shouldn't be reproducing.

(06-29-2012 01:18 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

+1 rep point for honesty.

I fully admit my selfishness....the rest is hogwash.

(06-29-2012 01:07 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  You don't understand what redistribution of income is?

Seriously?

He understands. He just won't answer the question.

BTW...I don't cut the other side of the aisle any slack for their corporate welfare programs. Both are theft.

(06-29-2012 01:18 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Yes I'll admit that. I don't see why it's so controversial considering we've been doing it for most of the last century (and some pockets in the 19th century).

Why don't you cons admit your selfishness, contempt for poor people and cruelty in wanting to deny them food, shelter and adequate health care?

It's about teaching them to fish instead of giving them a fish. IMO, giving someone a fish every day to sustain them and not teaching them how to fish is a more selfish way to get someone fed. All it does is make them forever beholden to the fish giver......but then, that's what you are really after, isn't it MAX.

(06-29-2012 01:40 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(06-29-2012 01:07 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  You don't understand what redistribution of income is?

Seriously?

He understands. He just won't answer the question.

BTW...I don't cut the other side of the aisle any slack for their corporate welfare programs. Both are theft.

I actually don't know and I can't answer your question until I know what you mean.