Fool, I'm a Christian, fool!

(07-21-2011 10:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Fool, I'm a Christian, fool!

Then you pose a threat. Just ask ONLINEGRAD.

(07-21-2011 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(07-21-2011 08:52 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(07-21-2011 08:46 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  Ellison is largely immaterial to the discussion. The question is not about Ellison, but about whether the things he claims are true. I say they are true. You, and your ilk, just resort of equivocations. That's tacit acknowledgement that you too think Ellison is correct.

Correct in what? That I think Muslims are dangerous to this nation? Is that a secret? You Prog idiots think Christians are dangerous to this nation. WTF is the difference, besides Christians not having a history of blowing themselves up for their "cause"?

It's funny, you Prog idiots trash Christians but are the first to defend Islam...and there are COUNTLESS stories on Muslims attacking free people. Hell, even in the military we had one guy go berserk in Texas and one Muslim throw a grenade into the tent of his officers.

I think all fundamental religions pose threats of some form or another. Unlike you, I'm not willing to piss on the Constitution to ease my concerns. Again, you prove my signature true.

Speak truth about people who are killing others all over the world everyday in the name of their religion: vile bigots.

Lie about other peaceful religions: A OK.

Regressive libtards. Nothing can explain their lunacy.

Taking Ellison out of it, I'm interested to know what the libertarians and the strict-constructionists think of Cain's comments from last week's Fox News Sunday ( http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/...n-mosques/ ):

"Asked whether any community should be able to prohibit a mosque, Cain said they should.
'They have the right to do that. That's not discriminating ... against that particular religion. That is an aspect of them building that mosque that doesn't get talked about,' he said.
Cain again argued that residents were objecting to 'the fact that Islam is both a religion and a set of laws, Shariah law. That's the difference between any one of our other traditional religions.'"

I'd also be interested in knowing what folks would think about the government prohibiting synagogues and churches, using say, Halakha or the Ten Commandments as pretext.

(07-24-2011 08:35 PM)JOwl Wrote:  "Asked whether any community should be able to prohibit a mosque, Cain said they should.
'They have the right to do that. That's not discriminating ... against that particular religion.

With all due respect, Mr. Cain, that is precisely what it is.