Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
End of CNN as We Know It
Author Message
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,681
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5059
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #61
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(03-02-2026 02:36 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Ok, that's too damn subtle for me to debate, lol. All I know is I watched it every day, and I have a different impression.

Its not "subtle."

Its like reading Matt Taibbi or watching the View. One is liberal, but honest. One is nuts. But neither is like reading Mollie Hemingway.
03-02-2026 07:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,824
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 5709
I Root For: Nice weather
Location: Following the sun

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #62
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(03-02-2026 07:47 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(03-02-2026 02:36 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Ok, that's too damn subtle for me to debate, lol. All I know is I watched it every day, and I have a different impression.

Its not "subtle."

Its like reading Matt Taibbi or watching the View. One is liberal, but honest. One is nuts. But neither is like reading Mollie Hemingway.

Are you saying CNN was left from the beginning? That's what I disagree with.

CNN was NOT obviously left leaning in 1980. THAT's when I'm talking about. 1980s and sometime into the 1990s, at least.

I watched every single day. I just don't recall when they eventually moved obviously left.

If you think differently, we're just going to disagree. And I am in no way a left leaning person. Wasn't back then, always indy, and certainly not such now.
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2026 12:13 AM by TripleA.)
03-03-2026 12:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BartlettTigerFan Offline
Have gun Will travel
*

Posts: 47,659
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 6847
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Undetermined
Post: #63
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
The world was still semi-sane in 1980.
03-03-2026 08:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,748
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3188
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #64
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(02-26-2026 07:15 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  
Quote:Paramount Skydance and Netflix have been in a bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery and now Netflix has lost that war, saying that the latest offer made by their rival was a "superior proposal." Paramount, headed by David Ellison, will acquire the entire company whereas Netflix was only seeking streaming, HBO, and their film studio.

"The transaction we negotiated would have created shareholder value with a clear path to regulatory approval. However, we've always been disciplined, and at the price required to match Paramount Skydance's latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive, so we are declining to match the Paramount Skydance bid," said Netflix CEO Greg Peters in a statement.


"Warner Bros. is a world-class organization, and we want to thank David Zaslav, Gunnar Wiedenfels, Bruce Campbell, Brad Singer and the WBD Board for running a fair and rigorous process. We believe we would have been strong stewards of Warner Bros.' iconic brands, and that our deal would have strengthened the entertainment industry and preserved and created more production jobs in the U.S. But this transaction was always a 'nice to have' at the right price, not a 'must have' at any price," the statement continued.

"Netflix's business is healthy, strong and growing organically, powered by our slate and best-in-class streaming service. This year, we'll invest approximately $20 billion in quality films and series and will expand our entertainment offering. Consistent with our capital allocation policy, we'll also resume our share repurchase program.

"We will continue to do what we've done for more than 20 years as a public company: delight our members, profitably grow our business, and drive long-term shareholder value," Peters concluded.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-n...gotiations

TAMPONS In Netflix Men’s Room TORPEDO Bid To Takeover Warner Bros: Report


Quote:Netflix’s aggressive bid to swallow Warner Bros. Discovery hit a wall last week, with a “tampon incident” playing a key role in turning Republican lawmakers against the deal.

As details emerge, it’s clear the virtue-signaling stunt of stocking men’s restrooms with feminine hygiene products highlighted Netflix’s unyielding commitment to radical transgender ideology, even as they begged for political approval in a post-woke era.

The drama unfolded during a congressional delegation’s visit to Netflix headquarters in Los Angeles several weeks ago, part of an annual tour around Grammy Awards time. Among the attendees was Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, a skeptic of Netflix’s claims to political neutrality.

The New York Post reports that while on the premises, Smith noticed a basket of tampons in the men’s restroom—a common tech company gesture to promote “inclusivity” for transgender employees.

But for conservatives, such moves symbolize efforts to normalize transgenderism, with ripple effects like encouraging harmful surgeries on children, eroding the nuclear family, and allowing biological males to dominate women’s sports.

“Let’s just say the chairman was pretty disturbed,” an insider familiar with Smith’s reaction told the Post.

The incident quickly rippled through Capitol Hill, reinforcing GOP suspicions that Netflix’s programming remains steeped in woke values. As one GOP staffer with firsthand knowledge put it: “This is 2026, not 2020. What were they thinking?”

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos had been mounting a charm offensive, including a Senate Judiciary antitrust subcommittee grilling last month by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). Sarandos insisted Netflix appeals to all tastes and faces stiff competition from social media and YouTube.

“Price wasn’t Sarandos’ only obstacle,” noted New York Post columnist Charles Gasparino. “During the six-month bidding war, many Republicans in Congress, state AG offices and of course the White House came to believe that Netflix was seeking to create a monopoly in streaming — an increasingly important way Americans consume entertainment.”

Gasparino added that most Republicans “believe [woke] values are front and center in Netflix’s programming, and the tampon incident, as it filtered through the halls of Congress, became proof that the company wasn’t changing its politics.”

Conservative advocacy groups have long documented Netflix’s bias, with content pushing transgenderism, DEI mandates, and other cultural-left staples—often in kids’ programming. Sarandos and co-founder Reed Hastings are major Democrat donors, while board member Susan Rice, a former Obama official and vocal Trump critic, made podcast remarks bashing Trump-associated businesses, further alienating the White House.

The deal’s collapse came after Paramount Skydance upped its hostile bid to $80.5 billion, trumping Netflix’s $73 billion offer. Sarandos pulled out, stating: “This transaction was always a ‘nice to have’ at the right price, not a ‘must have’ at any price.” Netflix’s stock plunged $200 billion during the saga but rebounded post-withdrawal.

For wider context, President Trump weighed in on the antitrust scrutiny, highlighting the merged entity’s “very big market share” and vowing involvement in the decision. This echoes broader concerns that the merger would stifle competition and amplify leftist narratives, as detailed in recent analyses warning of the “end of the Golden Age of streaming.”

This isn’t Netflix’s first brush with controversy over injecting radical ideology into entertainment. As we’ve covered extensively, the streamer has a track record of demonizing traditional values while promoting ‘progressive’ propaganda.

Full article includes examples of Netflix's progressive push>>>
03-04-2026 04:34 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,711
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 509
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #65
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
Quote:The U.S. Department of Justice has signed off on Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC Friday. ...

While the company received the greenlight, it could still face legal challenges from state attorneys general, including Rob Bonta in California, according to prior reports.

Paramount CEO David Ellison told investors during the company’s April earnings call that the deal was on track to close by September. The proposed merger has already received WBD shareholder approval.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/12/paramoun...l-doj.html

BETTER GET YOUR RESUME TOGETHER
06-12-2026 03:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,711
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 509
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #66
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
Paramount still plans to close WBD merger by end of September despite lawsuit

coalition of blue states seek to block merger ...

California
New York
Washington
Arizona (Dem Gov/AG)
Colorado
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Nevada (Dem AG)
New Jersey
New Mexico
Oregon

BLUE BAYOU
(This post was last modified: 07-14-2026 11:28 AM by green.)
07-14-2026 11:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,748
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3188
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #67
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
Paramount could ditch California over Newsom's war on Warner Bros. merger


Quote:The Newsom administration's hostilities towards the merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) could mean entertainment giant leaves California after it has been revealed the state may sue to block the Paramount's proposed $110 billion deal with WBD.


According to a report from Semafor, advisers close to Paramount CEO David Ellison have encouraged the company to consider relocating its headquarters and shifting tens of billions of dollars in future investment elsewhere if California Attorney General Rob Bonta files an antitrust lawsuit to block the deal. The discussions reportedly include relocating the company's headquarters and shifting much of its planned $30 billion in annual content spending away from California.


As there have been reports that Bonta may sue to block the deal, Newsom has increased funding for the antitrust litigation, per Deadline.

It comes after the New York Times reported on Sunday that a lawsuit loomed over the company from New York and California, in an attempt at US antitrust enforcement. One adviser described California as an "inhospitable" place to do business if the state chooses to fight the deal in court.


If Paramount ultimately relocates, it would join a growing list of major companies that have left California amid complaints over taxes, regulations, and the state's business environment. Recent departures include Chevron, Tesla and Oracle, which all established new headquarters in Texas. Paramount has already expanded outside California after signing a lease last year for nearly 300,000 square feet of studio space in Bayonne, New Jersey, giving it another potential operating hub.

High taxes, increasing regulation, costly labor rules, and frequent legal battles with major employers have encouraged companies to move jobs and headquarters to more business-friendly states. "We continue to engage constructively with the remaining few regulators around the world still considering the merger, including State Attorneys General, and are prepared to address any legitimate antitrust issues," Paramount said in a statement.
07-14-2026 12:04 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger1983 Offline
BBA
*

Posts: 41,551
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 2987
I Root For: Tigers - GTG!
Location: The enemy’s lair

DonatorsDonatorsDonators
Post: #68
RE: End of CNN as We Know It


Tennessee continues on the prowl for business relocations. I understand the concerns some people have about the Woke virus spreading, but most of the people relocating here are like refugees looking for sanity.
07-15-2026 04:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,711
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 509
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #69
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
Quote:California Attorney General Rob Bonta expressed concern for CNN’s future at David Ellison’s Paramount, citing Bari Weiss’ CBS News revamp as an example.

“As an American—and a proud American who cares deeply about our democracy and the future of it, its durability, its sustainability—I’m very concerned about the reports about what’s happening at CBS,” Bonta told Status in a Tuesday interview. “And I’m also concerned about the possibility that what’s happening at CBS could be part of an attempt to curry favor with the president who might want something similar to happen at CNN. And that led to an approval by the DOJ, even though the career attorneys thought there were problems with this deal and opposed this deal. We’ve heard that.”

https://www.thewrap.com/industry-news/de...paramount/

why does this SOB give a sh*t about cnn ...
view it through that prism ...
and then you'll understand ...

THE CRUX
07-15-2026 07:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Offline
Saved by the grace of God
*

Posts: 85,876
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 9609
I Root For: Jesus
Location: Feels like Amerika
Post: #70
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(03-03-2026 08:52 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  The world was still semi-sane in 1980.

And fun, don't forget fun. The 90s may have been the most fun decade of my lifetime. In the 70s and 80s, I was too worried about getting busted. And when I finally did in the early to mid 80s, it straightened me up like someone shoving a pole up my butt. So, the late 80s and all of the 90s held no such worries for me, and man did I have fun.
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2026 08:15 AM by TigerBlue4Ever.)
07-15-2026 08:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BartlettTigerFan Offline
Have gun Will travel
*

Posts: 47,659
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 6847
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Undetermined
Post: #71
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
I agree. 2000 was when chit started going downhill with a quickness.
07-15-2026 08:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b0ndsj0ns Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 30,774
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1636
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #72
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
Anyone pretending further media consolidation is a good thing is a moron. Just because the billionaire owners might currently be on "your side" politically doesn't mean they'll stay that way. The vast majority of them move with the political winds and try to stay on the good side of whoever is in power at the time, which is not always going to be the side you prefer.
07-15-2026 08:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bill dazzle Offline
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
*

Posts: 18,564
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 2032
I Root For: Vanderbilt
Location: Nashville
Post: #73
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(03-03-2026 12:11 AM)TripleA Wrote:  
(03-02-2026 07:47 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(03-02-2026 02:36 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Ok, that's too damn subtle for me to debate, lol. All I know is I watched it every day, and I have a different impression.

Its not "subtle."

Its like reading Matt Taibbi or watching the View. One is liberal, but honest. One is nuts. But neither is like reading Mollie Hemingway.

Are you saying CNN was left from the beginning? That's what I disagree with.

CNN was NOT obviously left leaning in 1980. THAT's when I'm talking about. 1980s and sometime into the 1990s, at least.

I watched every single day. I just don't recall when they eventually moved obviously left.

If you think differently, we're just going to disagree. And I am in no way a left leaning person. Wasn't back then, always indy, and certainly not such now.

I agree with T-A on this, bullet.

CNN was "reasonably neutral" in the 1980s.
07-15-2026 09:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,711
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 509
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #74
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(07-15-2026 08:58 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Anyone pretending further media consolidation is a good thing is a moron. Just because the billionaire owners might currently be on "your side" politically doesn't mean they'll stay that way. The vast majority of them move with the political winds and try to stay on the good side of whoever is in power at the time, which is not always going to be the side you prefer.

why is it a bad thing ...
and why is it the purview of this f*cking attorney general ...
he's probably judge shopping right now ...
direct me to barack hussein obama's appointees ...

HOME COURT ADVANTAGE
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2026 09:16 AM by green.)
07-15-2026 09:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oruvoice Offline
Howler Monkey
*

Posts: 11,372
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1598
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Tulsa
Post: #75
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(07-15-2026 08:58 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Anyone pretending further media consolidation is a good thing is a moron. Just because the billionaire owners might currently be on "your side" politically doesn't mean they'll stay that way. The vast majority of them move with the political winds and try to stay on the good side of whoever is in power at the time, which is not always going to be the side you prefer.

LOL! What major media outlet is on our side? 03-lmfao
07-15-2026 09:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b0ndsj0ns Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 30,774
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1636
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #76
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(07-15-2026 09:16 AM)green Wrote:  
(07-15-2026 08:58 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Anyone pretending further media consolidation is a good thing is a moron. Just because the billionaire owners might currently be on "your side" politically doesn't mean they'll stay that way. The vast majority of them move with the political winds and try to stay on the good side of whoever is in power at the time, which is not always going to be the side you prefer.

why is it a bad thing ...
and why is it the purview of this f*cking attorney general ...
he's probably judge shopping right now ...
direct me to barack hussein obama's appointees ...

HOME COURT ADVANTAGE

If instead of being owned by current Trump supporters the Ellison's it were owned by this boards forever boogie man George Soros you'd have literally the exact opposite opinion on this merger. I say "current Trump supporters" for a reason, because the Ellison's are the exact type of billionaires who will kiss up to whoever the President is regardless of party. If we have President Newsom in 2028 (trust me I hate the idea just as much as the rest of you do just for different reasons) they would play ball with him along with Zuck and even probably Musk would go back to trying to pretend to be center or "liberal" just to try to keep the government contracts train coming.

If you can't see how having the vast majority of media power consolidated into the hands of a few people then whatever you forfeit the right to cry if these outlets all of a sudden flip their reporting based upon the political winds.
07-15-2026 09:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b0ndsj0ns Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 30,774
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1636
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #77
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(07-15-2026 09:31 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  
(07-15-2026 08:58 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Anyone pretending further media consolidation is a good thing is a moron. Just because the billionaire owners might currently be on "your side" politically doesn't mean they'll stay that way. The vast majority of them move with the political winds and try to stay on the good side of whoever is in power at the time, which is not always going to be the side you prefer.

LOL! What major media outlet is on our side? 03-lmfao

What side do you think Fox is on? Now maybe on the right you have feelings about Fox the same way I have feelings as a leftist about MSDNC, but if you seriously attempt to argue Fox doesn't have a side you have brain worms.
07-15-2026 09:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CardinalJim Offline
Welcome to The New Age
*

Posts: 22,146
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 4776
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Rocky Knob, KY
Post: #78
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
There are no major media companies on the side of America First Conservatives. None…

The consolidation is a good thing for Conservatives simply because it gets rid of another entity that we have to fight to defeat.

If we could get all the media conglomerates together— Fox, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, NYT, Wapo and others into one figurative building and bring it down on them, our country would be better for it.

The 4th Estate has forgotten its job to hold ALL politicians of BOTH parties accountable. Worse yet the 4th Estate has sold its soul to Democrat Party. It fell in love with Obama and destroyed its objectivity as a result.

It’s been nearly 2 decades since we had an unbiased media and it doesn’t look to be getting any better.
07-15-2026 09:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
olliebaba Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,002
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 2961
I Root For: Christ
Location: El Paso
Post: #79
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
Fox sometimes delves into the Twilight Zone of Liberalism so one has to use discernment in hearing the news...not too often thank goodness.
07-15-2026 09:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b0ndsj0ns Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 30,774
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1636
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #80
RE: End of CNN as We Know It
(07-15-2026 09:50 AM)CardinalJim Wrote:  There are no major media companies on the side of America First Conservatives. None…

The consolidation is a good thing for Conservatives simply because it gets rid of another entity that we have to fight to defeat.

If we could get all the media conglomerates together— Fox, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, NYT, Wapo and others into one figurative building and bring it down on them, our country would be better for it.

The 4th Estate has forgotten its job to hold ALL politicians of BOTH parties accountable. Worse yet the 4th Estate has sold its soul to Democrat Party. It fell in love with Obama and destroyed its objectivity as a result.

It’s been nearly 2 decades since we had an unbiased media and it doesn’t look to be getting any better.

There are no major media outlets on the side of the left (and the Dem party ain't the actual left), none.

I don't disagree about this part in bold. One of the reasons for the actual left's rise this election cycle is that finally standard issue Dem voters have started to distrust the legacy media (still trust it far too much), and don't fully fall in line with all the slop these outlets feed them about who they should vote for.
07-15-2026 09:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.