Oh, no! He's all riled up now, folks! The Fat Commie Bastard is big mad! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES! /sarcasm

Be quiet and sit down.

(11-10-2025 11:15 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Oh, no! He's all riled up now, folks! The Fat Commie Bastard is big mad! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES! /sarcasm

Be quiet and sit down.

Serious question, lard-ass. Is your life really this boring?

(11-10-2025 11:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  The fact he/she got moved to the CIA is proof enough for me.

That too.

Its not like they do zero background checks (or maybe under Biden they were incompetent enough not to do them!).
Pipe bomb might even have been a tryout.

To the left:

(11-10-2025 11:01 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-10-2025 10:59 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Shoot me but I agree with Tom on this one (for now at least). This is one of them there 48 hour rule things.

It is dangerous to name names at this point, the libel suits will be astronomical if this is untrue.

Fair point. Still, this "conspiracy theory" has been floating around for years and we finally have some info on it. Of course, we were going to pounce on it.

I am all for getting to the bottom of all this, it is incredulous that is was swept under the rug the way it has been.

FBI - Hi do you know who did this... NO? Well that's good enough for us.

Let's get ready for the big day tomorrow everyone (I mean whoops - it might be a big day ... who knows wink wink???)

I just am not for jumping to judgement before everything has been properly verified and validated.

(11-09-2025 11:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 06:53 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 01:00 AM)banker Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 12:51 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-08-2025 10:19 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Yeah I see. You touched a nerve.

LOL. Please don't take this wrong, I'm not trolling, but why do you care either way?

He’s a Bigfoot truther.

Yes I am. Ask and I’ll tell you why. But with all the fakery going on in that world I can understand the disbelief and mockery.

For what it's worth, I think it's possible Bigfoot could exist. I just find it unlikely. (And this is based on my limited understanding of the subject.) Besides, we all know he's hocking Jack Link's Beef Jerky (and other snacks). lol (I'm sorry, WSME. I had to do it.)

It’s OK man. Just an interesting subject for me. No one has been able to debunk the Patterson Gimlin film. Most of the debunkers are pushing more outlandish views than the original film, which is now lost. Most of the ones being shown on so called documentaries now are highly degraded copies of copies. The first gen copies are quite remarkable and unlike the digital crap of today can be cleaned up and stabilized quite impressively. The original film quite clearly shows muscle movement, toes on the feet, butt cleavage and a 90* knee bend, which humans do not do while walking. It also shows a subject that covers a hundred yards quite quickly while not stumbling or slowing down at any point. Something an human in a costume with big fake feet with toes would have an hard time doing. Another quite interesting thing is the head of the subject. Most costume makers have to make the head of a costume larger to accommodate a human wearer’s vertical forehead. The subjects head is actually quite small for the size of the individual.

But the most incredible fact is that a couple of broke cowboys created a hoax using a costume that simply couldn’t be made for any amount of money at the time. And only took a minutes worth of shaky film of their incredible creation. Remember Hollywood’s Planet of the Apes had just won an Emmy for their costumes. Compare the two. There is no comparison.
Finally the footprints of the individual were filmed and cast. The stride was far more than a large man and the foot morphology has been studied by anthropologists and found to be different than human feet. This morphology shows up in many prints cast all over the northern hemisphere. Is every one making these casts experts in anatomy?

Finally Gimlin is still alive. He had his differences with Patterson but maintained the story was real. Patterson died many years ago but unlike debunkers claims, never said they faked the film. The amount of disinformation surrounding this film is akin to political differences. It’s easy to disbelieve with all of the obvious fakery that goes on on YouTube. But there are many witnesses that are quite believable mixed in with the bullchit today.

Just for fun




Bob Gimlin interview.

EXCLUSIVE: The Pipe Bomber’s Actions Were Necessary to Enable Speaker Pelosi to Certify the 2020 Election for Joe Biden

Quote:It turns out that the pipe bomber on Jan 6 was not a man, as had been assumed for more than four years. Reports over the past 48 hours claim that the pipe bomber was a Capitol policewoman by the name of Shauni Rae Kerkhoff. This comes after more than four years of not knowing who the pipe bomber was.

It appears that the FBI and Capitol Police were not interested in identifying the person who planted pipe bombs on the evening of January 5th near the RNC and DNC buildings in DC. Is this because the pipe bomber was one of them, and if it were found out that the Capitol Police were involved with the pipe bombs found on Jan 6, Americans would be outraged with the news?

Perhaps an even bigger reason to cover up the identity of the pipe bomber is that the planting of pipe bombs at the Capitol on the eve of Jan 6 was necessary to ensure the certification of the 2020 election for Joe Biden.

The following is taken from the book, The Steal – Volume III: The Cover-Up.

After all the corruption, lies, and manufactured results, and after the courts dismissed or ignored numerous cases related to the 2020 Election, there was still hope. The one last action that could be taken was not to certify the uncertifiable results from the 2020 election on Jan 6 and send them back to the states for review.

This could be done, per some legal experts, if the Vice President found it necessary to challenge the results in certain states. Seven states provided two sets of electors to Washington DC for certification on January 6, 2021. These states were Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico.

All these states had numerous issues in their 2020 Election results that led to the two sets of electors. The hope was that Vice President Pence would either choose the electors who backed President Trump’s election win, and the election would be over; or Pence would accept neither of the Trump or Biden electors and send the results back to the states, where the states would decide which set of electors would represent these states in the electoral college vote.

Another option was for Pence to decide to move the election to the House due to the duplicate sets of electors, and each state would receive one vote for president. Because there were more Republican-led states, it was hoped that President Trump would win the election and overcome the massive fraud this way. The final option for Pence was to accept the Biden delegates and give the uncertifiable election to Biden.

The Democrats must have known that if President Trump were certified the winner of the 2020 Election, their election crimes would come to haunt them. Hence, they needed a plan to ensure that Pence was out of the picture, allowing them to certify the election for Joe Biden. They had to remove any risk of Pence certifying the 2020 Election for Trump. Although Pence folded like a lawn chair on January 6 and showed his true colors, the Democrats had to ensure that Biden was placed in office and could not risk Pence awarding states to the set of delegates behind President Trump.

The pipe bomber was their plan.

The pipe bomber planted pipe bombs outside the DNC and the RNC offices the evening before Jan 6. These bombs were then located the morning of Jan 6, and the news of the bombs made its way to Congress as the Senate and the House convened to certify the 2020 Election. Pence was removed from the Senate, and Pelosi was removed from the House, and the day’s session went into recess.

It was widely reported that the reason the Capitol was cleared on Jan 6 was because of the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters. Still, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund testified before the Senate in February 2021 that the two congressional buildings, the Cannon House Office Building, as well as one of the Library of Congress buildings, were evacuated due to the discovery of the pipe bombs.

After Congress reconvened later in the evening of Jan 6, the vote was taken on the 2020 Election. Joe Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 Election, but even after the day’s events, 147 Republican lawmakers, Representatives, and Senators still objected to the results of the 2020 Election.

This vote was able to take place because Nancy Pelosi assumed control of the proceedings. Looking back, some people believe that the crisis at the Capitol earlier in the day was necessary to make this vote happen, and an “emergency” was required on Jan 6 to prevent the 2020 election coup from being uncovered.

The pipe bombs enabled Pelosi to take over the day’s proceedings per the rules in place and ensure Joe Biden was certified the winner of the 2020 Election.

Is this why former Speaker Pelosi announced her decision not to run again for Congress on the same day that it was reported that the identity of the pipe bomber was uncovered?

"Pence would accept neither of the Trump or Biden electors and send the results back to the states, where the states would decide which set of electors would represent these states in the electoral college vote"

This right here is what it was all about. But before anyone from those states could stand up and talk about the problem with the elections in those states someone had the doors opened and let everyone inside.

It was a Setup from Day One.

(11-10-2025 11:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  The fact he/she got moved to the CIA is proof enough for me.

Working as a security guard at a CIA property, article originally said she works for the CIA director's security detail. This claim is bunk and y'all are idiots for believing it.

(11-11-2025 11:28 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  "Pence would accept neither of the Trump or Biden electors and send the results back to the states, where the states would decide which set of electors would represent these states in the electoral college vote"

This right here is what it was all about. But before anyone from those states could stand up and talk about the problem with the elections in those states someone had the doors opened and let everyone inside.

It was a Setup from Day One.

There was no problem with the elections Trump was lying to your dumb***.

(11-10-2025 12:05 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 11:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 06:53 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 01:00 AM)banker Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 12:51 AM)TripleA Wrote:  LOL. Please don't take this wrong, I'm not trolling, but why do you care either way?

He’s a Bigfoot truther.

Yes I am. Ask and I’ll tell you why. But with all the fakery going on in that world I can understand the disbelief and mockery.

For what it's worth, I think it's possible Bigfoot could exist. I just find it unlikely. (And this is based on my limited understanding of the subject.) Besides, we all know he's hocking Jack Link's Beef Jerky (and other snacks). lol (I'm sorry, WSME. I had to do it.)

It’s OK man. Just an interesting subject for me. No one has been able to debunk the Patterson Gimlin film. Most of the debunkers are pushing more outlandish views than the original film, which is now lost. Most of the ones being shown on so called documentaries now are highly degraded copies of copies. The first gen copies are quite remarkable and unlike the digital crap of today can be cleaned up and stabilized quite impressively. The original film quite clearly shows muscle movement, toes on the feet, butt cleavage and a 90* knee bend, which humans do not do while walking. It also shows a subject that covers a hundred yards quite quickly while not stumbling or slowing down at any point. Something an human in a costume with big fake feet with toes would have an hard time doing. Another quite interesting thing is the head of the subject. Most costume makers have to make the head of a costume larger to accommodate a human wearer’s vertical forehead. The subjects head is actually quite small for the size of the individual.

But the most incredible fact is that a couple of broke cowboys created a hoax using a costume that simply couldn’t be made for any amount of money at the time. And only took a minutes worth of shaky film of their incredible creation. Remember Hollywood’s Planet of the Apes had just won an Emmy for their costumes. Compare the two. There is no comparison.
Finally the footprints of the individual were filmed and cast. The stride was far more than a large man and the foot morphology has been studied by anthropologists and found to be different than human feet. This morphology shows up in many prints cast all over the northern hemisphere. Is every one making these casts experts in anatomy?

Finally Gimlin is still alive. He had his differences with Patterson but maintained the story was real. Patterson died many years ago but unlike debunkers claims, never said they faked the film. The amount of disinformation surrounding this film is akin to political differences. It’s easy to disbelieve with all of the obvious fakery that goes on on YouTube. But there are many witnesses that are quite believable mixed in with the bullchit today.

Just for fun




Bob Gimlin interview.

You forgot to say the monster had tits. Who would fake a monster and think to put tits on it? If the Indians say it exists, then it exists. They are the ones that came up with the word "Sasquatch"

(11-11-2025 11:36 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-10-2025 12:05 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 11:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 06:53 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 01:00 AM)banker Wrote:  He’s a Bigfoot truther.

Yes I am. Ask and I’ll tell you why. But with all the fakery going on in that world I can understand the disbelief and mockery.

For what it's worth, I think it's possible Bigfoot could exist. I just find it unlikely. (And this is based on my limited understanding of the subject.) Besides, we all know he's hocking Jack Link's Beef Jerky (and other snacks). lol (I'm sorry, WSME. I had to do it.)

It’s OK man. Just an interesting subject for me. No one has been able to debunk the Patterson Gimlin film. Most of the debunkers are pushing more outlandish views than the original film, which is now lost. Most of the ones being shown on so called documentaries now are highly degraded copies of copies. The first gen copies are quite remarkable and unlike the digital crap of today can be cleaned up and stabilized quite impressively. The original film quite clearly shows muscle movement, toes on the feet, butt cleavage and a 90* knee bend, which humans do not do while walking. It also shows a subject that covers a hundred yards quite quickly while not stumbling or slowing down at any point. Something an human in a costume with big fake feet with toes would have an hard time doing. Another quite interesting thing is the head of the subject. Most costume makers have to make the head of a costume larger to accommodate a human wearer’s vertical forehead. The subjects head is actually quite small for the size of the individual.

But the most incredible fact is that a couple of broke cowboys created a hoax using a costume that simply couldn’t be made for any amount of money at the time. And only took a minutes worth of shaky film of their incredible creation. Remember Hollywood’s Planet of the Apes had just won an Emmy for their costumes. Compare the two. There is no comparison.
Finally the footprints of the individual were filmed and cast. The stride was far more than a large man and the foot morphology has been studied by anthropologists and found to be different than human feet. This morphology shows up in many prints cast all over the northern hemisphere. Is every one making these casts experts in anatomy?

Finally Gimlin is still alive. He had his differences with Patterson but maintained the story was real. Patterson died many years ago but unlike debunkers claims, never said they faked the film. The amount of disinformation surrounding this film is akin to political differences. It’s easy to disbelieve with all of the obvious fakery that goes on on YouTube. But there are many witnesses that are quite believable mixed in with the bullchit today.

Just for fun




Bob Gimlin interview.

You forgot to say the monster had tits. Who would fake a monster and think to put tits on it? If the Indians say it exists, then it exists. They are the ones that came up with the word "Sasquatch"

An Indian agent named J.W. Burns coined the term sasquatch, you're either misinformed or willfully lying to everyone.

(11-11-2025 11:28 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  "Pence would accept neither of the Trump or Biden electors and send the results back to the states, where the states would decide which set of electors would represent these states in the electoral college vote"

This right here is what it was all about. But before anyone from those states could stand up and talk about the problem with the elections in those states someone had the doors opened and let everyone inside.

It was a Setup from Day One.

Of course, it was. But people like this Roxie person aren't skeptical enough to see it. Also, it just became the seventeen person I've put on ignore. (Heh. One more on the list and it'll become eligible to vote. )

Roxie Music, wherever the hell you came from: Take what you just said and shove it up your ass. I honestly don't care. Also, I find it funny that you registered last year, but only waited until now to post, and it was over here. Did someone invite you? (On second thought, it doesn't matter. You're a leftist troll.)

(11-11-2025 11:42 AM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:36 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-10-2025 12:05 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 11:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 06:53 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Yes I am. Ask and I’ll tell you why. But with all the fakery going on in that world I can understand the disbelief and mockery.

For what it's worth, I think it's possible Bigfoot could exist. I just find it unlikely. (And this is based on my limited understanding of the subject.) Besides, we all know he's hocking Jack Link's Beef Jerky (and other snacks). lol (I'm sorry, WSME. I had to do it.)

It’s OK man. Just an interesting subject for me. No one has been able to debunk the Patterson Gimlin film. Most of the debunkers are pushing more outlandish views than the original film, which is now lost. Most of the ones being shown on so called documentaries now are highly degraded copies of copies. The first gen copies are quite remarkable and unlike the digital crap of today can be cleaned up and stabilized quite impressively. The original film quite clearly shows muscle movement, toes on the feet, butt cleavage and a 90* knee bend, which humans do not do while walking. It also shows a subject that covers a hundred yards quite quickly while not stumbling or slowing down at any point. Something an human in a costume with big fake feet with toes would have an hard time doing. Another quite interesting thing is the head of the subject. Most costume makers have to make the head of a costume larger to accommodate a human wearer’s vertical forehead. The subjects head is actually quite small for the size of the individual.

But the most incredible fact is that a couple of broke cowboys created a hoax using a costume that simply couldn’t be made for any amount of money at the time. And only took a minutes worth of shaky film of their incredible creation. Remember Hollywood’s Planet of the Apes had just won an Emmy for their costumes. Compare the two. There is no comparison.
Finally the footprints of the individual were filmed and cast. The stride was far more than a large man and the foot morphology has been studied by anthropologists and found to be different than human feet. This morphology shows up in many prints cast all over the northern hemisphere. Is every one making these casts experts in anatomy?

Finally Gimlin is still alive. He had his differences with Patterson but maintained the story was real. Patterson died many years ago but unlike debunkers claims, never said they faked the film. The amount of disinformation surrounding this film is akin to political differences. It’s easy to disbelieve with all of the obvious fakery that goes on on YouTube. But there are many witnesses that are quite believable mixed in with the bullchit today.

Just for fun




Bob Gimlin interview.

You forgot to say the monster had tits. Who would fake a monster and think to put tits on it? If the Indians say it exists, then it exists. They are the ones that came up with the word "Sasquatch"

An Indian agent named J.W. Burns coined the term sasquatch, you're either misinformed or willfully lying to everyone.

From the Chehalis Tribe. Bournes was Irish, newbie. Stay in your lane.

(11-11-2025 11:49 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:42 AM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:36 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-10-2025 12:05 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 11:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  For what it's worth, I think it's possible Bigfoot could exist. I just find it unlikely. (And this is based on my limited understanding of the subject.) Besides, we all know he's hocking Jack Link's Beef Jerky (and other snacks). lol (I'm sorry, WSME. I had to do it.)

It’s OK man. Just an interesting subject for me. No one has been able to debunk the Patterson Gimlin film. Most of the debunkers are pushing more outlandish views than the original film, which is now lost. Most of the ones being shown on so called documentaries now are highly degraded copies of copies. The first gen copies are quite remarkable and unlike the digital crap of today can be cleaned up and stabilized quite impressively. The original film quite clearly shows muscle movement, toes on the feet, butt cleavage and a 90* knee bend, which humans do not do while walking. It also shows a subject that covers a hundred yards quite quickly while not stumbling or slowing down at any point. Something an human in a costume with big fake feet with toes would have an hard time doing. Another quite interesting thing is the head of the subject. Most costume makers have to make the head of a costume larger to accommodate a human wearer’s vertical forehead. The subjects head is actually quite small for the size of the individual.

But the most incredible fact is that a couple of broke cowboys created a hoax using a costume that simply couldn’t be made for any amount of money at the time. And only took a minutes worth of shaky film of their incredible creation. Remember Hollywood’s Planet of the Apes had just won an Emmy for their costumes. Compare the two. There is no comparison.
Finally the footprints of the individual were filmed and cast. The stride was far more than a large man and the foot morphology has been studied by anthropologists and found to be different than human feet. This morphology shows up in many prints cast all over the northern hemisphere. Is every one making these casts experts in anatomy?

Finally Gimlin is still alive. He had his differences with Patterson but maintained the story was real. Patterson died many years ago but unlike debunkers claims, never said they faked the film. The amount of disinformation surrounding this film is akin to political differences. It’s easy to disbelieve with all of the obvious fakery that goes on on YouTube. But there are many witnesses that are quite believable mixed in with the bullchit today.

Just for fun




Bob Gimlin interview.

You forgot to say the monster had tits. Who would fake a monster and think to put tits on it? If the Indians say it exists, then it exists. They are the ones that came up with the word "Sasquatch"

An Indian agent named J.W. Burns coined the term sasquatch, you're either misinformed or willfully lying to everyone.

From the Chehalis Tribe. Bournes was Irish, newbie. Stay in your lane.

"No I don't think I will," says the newbie. (Probably.)

(11-11-2025 11:49 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:42 AM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:36 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-10-2025 12:05 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-09-2025 11:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  For what it's worth, I think it's possible Bigfoot could exist. I just find it unlikely. (And this is based on my limited understanding of the subject.) Besides, we all know he's hocking Jack Link's Beef Jerky (and other snacks). lol (I'm sorry, WSME. I had to do it.)

It’s OK man. Just an interesting subject for me. No one has been able to debunk the Patterson Gimlin film. Most of the debunkers are pushing more outlandish views than the original film, which is now lost. Most of the ones being shown on so called documentaries now are highly degraded copies of copies. The first gen copies are quite remarkable and unlike the digital crap of today can be cleaned up and stabilized quite impressively. The original film quite clearly shows muscle movement, toes on the feet, butt cleavage and a 90* knee bend, which humans do not do while walking. It also shows a subject that covers a hundred yards quite quickly while not stumbling or slowing down at any point. Something an human in a costume with big fake feet with toes would have an hard time doing. Another quite interesting thing is the head of the subject. Most costume makers have to make the head of a costume larger to accommodate a human wearer’s vertical forehead. The subjects head is actually quite small for the size of the individual.

But the most incredible fact is that a couple of broke cowboys created a hoax using a costume that simply couldn’t be made for any amount of money at the time. And only took a minutes worth of shaky film of their incredible creation. Remember Hollywood’s Planet of the Apes had just won an Emmy for their costumes. Compare the two. There is no comparison.
Finally the footprints of the individual were filmed and cast. The stride was far more than a large man and the foot morphology has been studied by anthropologists and found to be different than human feet. This morphology shows up in many prints cast all over the northern hemisphere. Is every one making these casts experts in anatomy?

Finally Gimlin is still alive. He had his differences with Patterson but maintained the story was real. Patterson died many years ago but unlike debunkers claims, never said they faked the film. The amount of disinformation surrounding this film is akin to political differences. It’s easy to disbelieve with all of the obvious fakery that goes on on YouTube. But there are many witnesses that are quite believable mixed in with the bullchit today.

Just for fun




Bob Gimlin interview.

You forgot to say the monster had tits. Who would fake a monster and think to put tits on it? If the Indians say it exists, then it exists. They are the ones that came up with the word "Sasquatch"

An Indian agent named J.W. Burns coined the term sasquatch, you're either misinformed or willfully lying to everyone.

From the Chehalis Tribe. Bournes was Irish, newbie. Stay in your lane.

*Burns was Irish correct and as established he coined the term not Indians glad we are in agreement.

(11-11-2025 11:44 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:28 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  "Pence would accept neither of the Trump or Biden electors and send the results back to the states, where the states would decide which set of electors would represent these states in the electoral college vote"

This right here is what it was all about. But before anyone from those states could stand up and talk about the problem with the elections in those states someone had the doors opened and let everyone inside.

It was a Setup from Day One.

Of course, it was. But people like this Roxie person aren't skeptical enough to see it. Also, it just became the seventeen person I've put on ignore. (Heh. One more on the list and it'll become eligible to vote. )

Roxie Music, wherever the hell you came from: Take what you just said and shove it up your ass. I honestly don't care. Also, I find it funny that you registered last year, but only waited until now to post, and it was over here. Did someone invite you? (On second thought, it doesn't matter. You're a leftist troll.)

Not a troll just here to call out all the wrongness y'all put out.

lulz, the Irish BigFoot has been seen. It was a lion like animal.

video is NSFW, but shows the actual animal at the end.

if the embed doesnt work, just cvlick this link.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/hcSWo1DdmWo

(11-11-2025 11:35 AM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-11-2025 11:28 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  "Pence would accept neither of the Trump or Biden electors and send the results back to the states, where the states would decide which set of electors would represent these states in the electoral college vote"

This right here is what it was all about. But before anyone from those states could stand up and talk about the problem with the elections in those states someone had the doors opened and let everyone inside.

It was a Setup from Day One.

There was no problem with the elections Trump was lying to your dumb***.

So,, name calling right out of the gate. I think, maybe you have been here before but under another name. What do you have, about 10 post under the name you're using today. You are a Troll so move along little fellow.

So which preening Memphis liberal on here started a burner account last year?

This won't last long.