Drunk tanq loving some deep state retards....

Im shocked i tell ya

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(11-05-2025 08:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  You keep saying I have a stick up my butt, like you bother me. Dude, you suck at psychology, which should be odd for an attorney.

You don't bother me one bit. You make me laugh. If you ever left, I would miss you. It is funny to poke you, b/c you have such an over-the-top reaction to everything.

It's like somebody walks up and gently jabs you from behind, and you fall down, start screaming, and call for an ambulance.

Okey dokey. Again, I suggest you actually read up on what an actual 'leftist' position is. As opposed to your 2nd grade catch all for 'bothers 3A' that seems to be the result. Not a great look there, sparkles.

Or perhaps with your new alternative of 'I just do it to bother people.' Again, if you want to emphasize that you readily and consistently perform that style of immature dumbshit act is, you are more than free to do that as well. And I guess that says none of your posts and the comments in them, and your vaunted opinions that you set forth there are reflective of any consideration whatsoever. Again, another great look there, sparkles.

Im not sure which of the 2 above excuses is better for you. Each has its own unique pitfalls. Tough choice. Straight ignorance in one, or sheer dumbassery in the second there for you. You paint quite the awesome choice for yourself in those.

(11-05-2025 08:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  Drunk tanq loving some deep state retards....

Im shocked i tell ya

The apex of deep thoughts from Maxi above. Cool cool.

(11-05-2025 08:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  Drunk tanq loving some deep state retards....

Im shocked i tell ya

The apex of deep thoughts from Maxi above. Cool cool.

Three in a row

(11-05-2025 08:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  You keep saying I have a stick up my butt, like you bother me. Dude, you suck at psychology, which should be odd for an attorney.

You don't bother me one bit. You make me laugh. If you ever left, I would miss you. It is funny to poke you, b/c you have such an over-the-top reaction to everything.

It's like somebody walks up and gently jabs you from behind, and you fall down, start screaming, and call for an ambulance.

Okey dokey. Again, I suggest you actually read up on what an actual 'leftist' position is. As opposed to your 2nd grade catch all for 'bothers 3A' that seems to be the result. Not a great look there, sparkles.

Or perhaps with your new alternative of 'I just do it to bother people.' Again, if you want to emphasize that you readily and consistently perform that style of immature dumbshit act is, you are more than free to do that as well. And I guess that says none of your posts and the comments in them, and your vaunted opinions that you set forth there are reflective of any consideration whatsoever. Again, another great look there, sparkles.

Im not sure which of the 2 above excuses is better for you. Each has its own unique pitfalls. Tough choice. Straight ignorance in one, or sheer dumbassery in the second there for you. You paint quite the awesome choice for yourself in those.

You misread everything. I think it's a permanent condition with you. We aren't even talking now about what's left, or not.

And the poking fun at you was in response to you saying I had a stick up my butt, not an alternative incentive to harass you. I get on you b/c you take such "anti-right" positions in here, then deny you take them. And it's funny.

Every debate in here is hard left-right, not much nuance. And you come down on the side opposite most of us on the right in here.

If you don't want to call it left, fine. But if you're hanging out in a herd of green bulls, and you're purple, you kind of stick out, while all the time claiming you're not a purple bull.

(11-05-2025 10:52 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

Care to point out where in my comments here I have "criticize[d] the right"?

The comments are actually neutral on their face. But to you they are "ones the left would make."

I think we have the real issue at hand. It appears that in 3Aville, any comment not in line with 3Aville is 'left leaning'. That explains a whole lot, to tell the truth.

Not to mention you being dumber than dirt in not being able to back up your incessant comments with any instances, and you being too fing lazy to actually back up your kneejerk predispostions. But you be you, punkin.

While I agree that many of your comments could be construed as neutral if examined at just the right angle with the light hitting them just right, Andy's comments contained not one word of true disparagement, not one instance of name-calling, yet your reaction is hateful, almost violent, and ridiculous. Far from neutral...

3A (I assume Andy) has a stick up his ass to classify anything and everything I say as 'left leaning'.

Its stupid as ****.

Quote:And you wonder at your reception here. I put you on ignore to avoid being dragged into these ridiculous exchanges, but for some reason I saw this one. It's understandable that you are constantly on the defensive here, but have you ever asked yourself with any honesty why you are received here so poorly? I, for one, couldn't care less whether you identify as left, right, in the middle, or off on another planet somewhere, but you can't expect to come here throwing darts at everyone around you with whom you may disagree and expect a warm welcome. I understand that you have had some serious darts thrown at you also, but reacting in kind isn't productive at all. I've made an effort to be more civil; you should try it. I know I'm not perfect at it; I slip up at times, but no one expects perfection.

Again, it is stupid as **** to label anything and everything said as 'leftie' -- simply because the statement doesnt agree with the mindset of someone.

All I have *literally* said in this thread is 'take a look at the underlying charge, and *actual* underlying facts.' Its idiotic to label that as 'left'. And honestly, when done continuously (literally without regard to what an actual 'leftie' would believe), that engenders the response I gave out that you highlighted.

Quote:While I value your legal expertise and your opinions, right or wrong though they may be, it's not so valuable that I have to eat shite in order to be privy to it without a tongue lashing.

If / when comments are made in neutral tone, I respond in that tone. When approached in the friendly tone, I respond in a freindly tone.

When someone decides to stupidly translate everything I say to 'being a leftie', when the comments dont touch on *any* left leaning issues whatsoever, and when that poster decides to do that on a continual basis -- I will respond as I did above. Bummer.

And to boot, your beloved 3A (I assume Andy) actually does post stuff without *ever* bothering to verify. Bummer, thats lazy as hell. And when your beloved Andy (I assume 3A) decides to not even bother to denote *any* supposed positions I have that are left when callenged -- and when he responds "I am simply going to keep saying this without ever bothering to look" --- that actually is lazy as ****. Borders on being dishonest. So I suggest you use that context when you come to the defense of your beloved Andy. As before, context and facts are imnportant. Maybe not to everyone, but overall they are. Or should be.

Dude. Get real. I have two people blocked on this site. You and your butt buddy redwingtom. I don’t remember why I blocked you but I do know it means you’re a hyper partisan douche canoe. The only people that give you points are redwingtom and Elvis another partisan douche bag. Get a grip. You’re a leftist shill and you boy Comey lied to congress and we proved it. You pretend to be nonpartisan, like you pretend you’re an attorney, but no one is buying it. So now log off and finish off that box wine you have been chugging.

(11-05-2025 08:34 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:52 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

Care to point out where in my comments here I have "criticize[d] the right"?

The comments are actually neutral on their face. But to you they are "ones the left would make."

I think we have the real issue at hand. It appears that in 3Aville, any comment not in line with 3Aville is 'left leaning'. That explains a whole lot, to tell the truth.

Not to mention you being dumber than dirt in not being able to back up your incessant comments with any instances, and you being too fing lazy to actually back up your kneejerk predispostions. But you be you, punkin.

While I agree that many of your comments could be construed as neutral if examined at just the right angle with the light hitting them just right, Andy's comments contained not one word of true disparagement, not one instance of name-calling, yet your reaction is hateful, almost violent, and ridiculous. Far from neutral...

3A (I assume Andy) has a stick up his ass to classify anything and everything I say as 'left leaning'.

Its stupid as ****.

Quote:And you wonder at your reception here. I put you on ignore to avoid being dragged into these ridiculous exchanges, but for some reason I saw this one. It's understandable that you are constantly on the defensive here, but have you ever asked yourself with any honesty why you are received here so poorly? I, for one, couldn't care less whether you identify as left, right, in the middle, or off on another planet somewhere, but you can't expect to come here throwing darts at everyone around you with whom you may disagree and expect a warm welcome. I understand that you have had some serious darts thrown at you also, but reacting in kind isn't productive at all. I've made an effort to be more civil; you should try it. I know I'm not perfect at it; I slip up at times, but no one expects perfection.

Again, it is stupid as **** to label anything and everything said as 'leftie' -- simply because the statement doesnt agree with the mindset of someone.

All I have *literally* said in this thread is 'take a look at the underlying charge, and *actual* underlying facts.' Its idiotic to label that as 'left'. And honestly, when done continuously (literally without regard to what an actual 'leftie' would believe), that engenders the response I gave out that you highlighted.

Quote:While I value your legal expertise and your opinions, right or wrong though they may be, it's not so valuable that I have to eat shite in order to be privy to it without a tongue lashing.

If / when comments are made in neutral tone, I respond in that tone. When approached in the friendly tone, I respond in a freindly tone.

When someone decides to stupidly translate everything I say to 'being a leftie', when the comments dont touch on *any* left leaning issues whatsoever, and when that poster decides to do that on a continual basis -- I will respond as I did above. Bummer.

And to boot, your beloved 3A (I assume Andy) actually does post stuff without *ever* bothering to verify. Bummer, thats lazy as hell. And when your beloved Andy (I assume 3A) decides to not even bother to denote *any* supposed positions I have that are left when callenged -- and when he responds "I am simply going to keep saying this without ever bothering to look" --- that actually is lazy as ****. Borders on being dishonest. So I suggest you use that context when you come to the defense of your beloved Andy. As before, context and facts are imnportant. Maybe not to everyone, but overall they are. Or should be.

Dude. Get real. I have two people blocked on this site. You and your butt buddy redwingtom. I don’t remember why I blocked you but I do know it means you’re a hyper partisan douche canoe. The only people that give you points are redwingtom and Elvis another partisan douche bag. Get a grip. You’re a leftist shill and you boy Comey lied to congress and we proved it. You pretend to be nonpartisan, like you pretend you’re an attorney, but no one is buying it. So now log off and finish off that box wine you have been chugging.

Bravo!

(11-05-2025 08:34 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:52 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

Care to point out where in my comments here I have "criticize[d] the right"?

The comments are actually neutral on their face. But to you they are "ones the left would make."

I think we have the real issue at hand. It appears that in 3Aville, any comment not in line with 3Aville is 'left leaning'. That explains a whole lot, to tell the truth.

Not to mention you being dumber than dirt in not being able to back up your incessant comments with any instances, and you being too fing lazy to actually back up your kneejerk predispostions. But you be you, punkin.

While I agree that many of your comments could be construed as neutral if examined at just the right angle with the light hitting them just right, Andy's comments contained not one word of true disparagement, not one instance of name-calling, yet your reaction is hateful, almost violent, and ridiculous. Far from neutral...

3A (I assume Andy) has a stick up his ass to classify anything and everything I say as 'left leaning'.

Its stupid as ****.

Quote:And you wonder at your reception here. I put you on ignore to avoid being dragged into these ridiculous exchanges, but for some reason I saw this one. It's understandable that you are constantly on the defensive here, but have you ever asked yourself with any honesty why you are received here so poorly? I, for one, couldn't care less whether you identify as left, right, in the middle, or off on another planet somewhere, but you can't expect to come here throwing darts at everyone around you with whom you may disagree and expect a warm welcome. I understand that you have had some serious darts thrown at you also, but reacting in kind isn't productive at all. I've made an effort to be more civil; you should try it. I know I'm not perfect at it; I slip up at times, but no one expects perfection.

Again, it is stupid as **** to label anything and everything said as 'leftie' -- simply because the statement doesnt agree with the mindset of someone.

All I have *literally* said in this thread is 'take a look at the underlying charge, and *actual* underlying facts.' Its idiotic to label that as 'left'. And honestly, when done continuously (literally without regard to what an actual 'leftie' would believe), that engenders the response I gave out that you highlighted.

Quote:While I value your legal expertise and your opinions, right or wrong though they may be, it's not so valuable that I have to eat shite in order to be privy to it without a tongue lashing.

If / when comments are made in neutral tone, I respond in that tone. When approached in the friendly tone, I respond in a freindly tone.

When someone decides to stupidly translate everything I say to 'being a leftie', when the comments dont touch on *any* left leaning issues whatsoever, and when that poster decides to do that on a continual basis -- I will respond as I did above. Bummer.

And to boot, your beloved 3A (I assume Andy) actually does post stuff without *ever* bothering to verify. Bummer, thats lazy as hell. And when your beloved Andy (I assume 3A) decides to not even bother to denote *any* supposed positions I have that are left when callenged -- and when he responds "I am simply going to keep saying this without ever bothering to look" --- that actually is lazy as ****. Borders on being dishonest. So I suggest you use that context when you come to the defense of your beloved Andy. As before, context and facts are imnportant. Maybe not to everyone, but overall they are. Or should be.

Dude. Get real. I have two people blocked on this site. You and your butt buddy redwingtom. I don’t remember why I blocked you but I do know it means you’re a hyper partisan douche canoe. The only people that give you points are redwingtom and Elvis another partisan douche bag. Get a grip. You’re a leftist shill and you boy Comey lied to congress and we proved it. You pretend to be nonpartisan, like you pretend you’re an attorney, but no one is buying it. So now log off and finish off that box wine you have been chugging.

(11-05-2025 08:34 PM)No Bull Wrote:  Dude. Get real. I have two people blocked on this site. You and your butt buddy redwingtom. I don’t remember why I blocked you but I do know it means you’re a hyper partisan douche canoe. The only people that give you points are redwingtom and Elvis another partisan douche bag. Get a grip. You’re a leftist shill and you boy Comey lied to congress and we proved it. You pretend to be nonpartisan, like you pretend you’re an attorney, but no one is buying it. So now log off and finish off that box wine you have been chugging.

MAGA intellect rears it head once again. Yay.

(11-05-2025 08:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:34 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 10:52 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Care to point out where in my comments here I have "criticize[d] the right"?

The comments are actually neutral on their face. But to you they are "ones the left would make."

I think we have the real issue at hand. It appears that in 3Aville, any comment not in line with 3Aville is 'left leaning'. That explains a whole lot, to tell the truth.

Not to mention you being dumber than dirt in not being able to back up your incessant comments with any instances, and you being too fing lazy to actually back up your kneejerk predispostions. But you be you, punkin.

While I agree that many of your comments could be construed as neutral if examined at just the right angle with the light hitting them just right, Andy's comments contained not one word of true disparagement, not one instance of name-calling, yet your reaction is hateful, almost violent, and ridiculous. Far from neutral...

3A (I assume Andy) has a stick up his ass to classify anything and everything I say as 'left leaning'.

Its stupid as ****.

Quote:And you wonder at your reception here. I put you on ignore to avoid being dragged into these ridiculous exchanges, but for some reason I saw this one. It's understandable that you are constantly on the defensive here, but have you ever asked yourself with any honesty why you are received here so poorly? I, for one, couldn't care less whether you identify as left, right, in the middle, or off on another planet somewhere, but you can't expect to come here throwing darts at everyone around you with whom you may disagree and expect a warm welcome. I understand that you have had some serious darts thrown at you also, but reacting in kind isn't productive at all. I've made an effort to be more civil; you should try it. I know I'm not perfect at it; I slip up at times, but no one expects perfection.

Again, it is stupid as **** to label anything and everything said as 'leftie' -- simply because the statement doesnt agree with the mindset of someone.

All I have *literally* said in this thread is 'take a look at the underlying charge, and *actual* underlying facts.' Its idiotic to label that as 'left'. And honestly, when done continuously (literally without regard to what an actual 'leftie' would believe), that engenders the response I gave out that you highlighted.

Quote:While I value your legal expertise and your opinions, right or wrong though they may be, it's not so valuable that I have to eat shite in order to be privy to it without a tongue lashing.

If / when comments are made in neutral tone, I respond in that tone. When approached in the friendly tone, I respond in a freindly tone.

When someone decides to stupidly translate everything I say to 'being a leftie', when the comments dont touch on *any* left leaning issues whatsoever, and when that poster decides to do that on a continual basis -- I will respond as I did above. Bummer.

And to boot, your beloved 3A (I assume Andy) actually does post stuff without *ever* bothering to verify. Bummer, thats lazy as hell. And when your beloved Andy (I assume 3A) decides to not even bother to denote *any* supposed positions I have that are left when callenged -- and when he responds "I am simply going to keep saying this without ever bothering to look" --- that actually is lazy as ****. Borders on being dishonest. So I suggest you use that context when you come to the defense of your beloved Andy. As before, context and facts are imnportant. Maybe not to everyone, but overall they are. Or should be.

Dude. Get real. I have two people blocked on this site. You and your butt buddy redwingtom. I don’t remember why I blocked you but I do know it means you’re a hyper partisan douche canoe. The only people that give you points are redwingtom and Elvis another partisan douche bag. Get a grip. You’re a leftist shill and you boy Comey lied to congress and we proved it. You pretend to be nonpartisan, like you pretend you’re an attorney, but no one is buying it. So now log off and finish off that box wine you have been chugging.

Bravo!

MAGA idiot cheers top MAGA intellect. Yay.

(11-05-2025 08:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  Drunk tanq loving some deep state retards....

Im shocked i tell ya

The apex of deep thoughts from Maxi above. Cool cool.

Sorry, I cant find a banjo meme to meet your cutey pie meme.

The rare loon double triple



Bwahahahahaha

The guy bragged about it in the press. He said he gave it to his friend to leak so that he wasn't doing it directly.

He thinks somehow that means he didn't lie to Congress.

(11-05-2025 08:47 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 08:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  Drunk tanq loving some deep state retards....

Im shocked i tell ya

The apex of deep thoughts from Maxi above. Cool cool.

Sorry, I cant find a banjo meme to meet your cutey pie meme.

lemme help with that...