(11-04-2025 08:23 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:19 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Id say -- can one of you peeps pop a quote to the statement made by Comey that he is being charged with lying? And to the question that preceded it, while you are at it.

Not to mention some fairly serious hiccups in the indictment process (not the 'vindictive prosecution' thingy, though) that could kill the issue before a trial gets going.

Just saying facts matter.

Hey Einstein, here's an example of you taking the left's POV.

Asking those questions is a leftist POV to you ? Or do you just have an urge to post meme responses to anything and everything?

(11-04-2025 08:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:23 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:19 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Id say -- can one of you peeps pop a quote to the statement made by Comey that he is being charged with lying? And to the question that preceded it, while you are at it.

Not to mention some fairly serious hiccups in the indictment process (not the 'vindictive prosecution' thingy, though) that could kill the issue before a trial gets going.

Just saying facts matter.

Hey Einstein, here's an example of you taking the left's POV.

Asking those questions is a leftist POV to you ? Or do you just have an urge to post meme responses to anything and everything?

Quote:you don't think his involvement with muh muh muh russiagate isn't enough to prove he's a blatant liar .......... ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmkayyyyyyyyyy, counselor...

Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

(11-04-2025 08:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Asking those questions is a leftist POV to you ? Or do you just have an urge to post meme responses to anything and everything?

Quote:you don't think his involvement with muh muh muh russiagate isn't enough to prove he's a blatant liar .......... ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmkayyyyyyyyyy, counselor...

Ill take it you dont know, nor really care what he is charged with. neat stuff.

And Ill take it you really do not care about any of the facts in the issue. Double neat stuff.

(11-04-2025 08:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

Care to point out where in my comments here I have "criticize[d] the right"?

The comments are actually neutral on their face. But to you they are "ones the left would make."

I think we have the real issue at hand. It appears that in 3Aville, any comment not in line with 3Aville is 'left leaning'. That explains a whole lot, to tell the truth.

Not to mention you being dumber than dirt in not being able to back up your incessant comments with any instances, and you being too fing lazy to actually back up your kneejerk predispostions. But you be you, punkin.

I'm devastated.

And you're disingenuous. And not worth debating, due to that. So I will continue to do what I do.

(11-04-2025 08:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

Both

(11-04-2025 08:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm devastated.

And you're disingenuous. And not worth debating, due to that. So I will continue to do what I do.

Yep. He's pretty much nothing but a disingenuous troll and should be treated as such.

SK: Agreed. Both is the correct answer.

(11-04-2025 08:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm devastated.

And you're disingenuous. And not worth debating, due to that. So I will continue to do what I do.

Yes, you have *absolutely* continued to run away from providing any specific lefty things, and *absolutely* continued to yammer empty rhetorical generalizations.

Neat stuff, mi amigo.

I am not surprised in the very least you will continue that, and that you proudly proclaim you will continue to do so. Lolz.

Sorry, Clarence. The adults are talking.

If tanq says one thing, bet on the opposite happening.

0-200

(11-04-2025 10:57 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Sorry, Clarence. The adults are talking.

Actually no they are not. You are. Cry some moar lil boy.

(11-04-2025 09:18 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm devastated.

And you're disingenuous. And not worth debating, due to that. So I will continue to do what I do.

Yes, you have *absolutely* continued to run away from providing any specific lefty things, and *absolutely* continued to yammer empty rhetorical generalizations.

Neat stuff, mi amigo.

I am not surprised in the very least you will continue that, and that you proudly proclaim you will continue to do so. Lolz.

Here's a fact for you. One of us tells the truth. That would be me.

And I now have pointed out 3 lefty positions, just tonight.

(11-04-2025 08:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Asking those questions is a leftist POV to you ? Or do you just have an urge to post meme responses to anything and everything?

Quote:you don't think his involvement with muh muh muh russiagate isn't enough to prove he's a blatant liar .......... ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmkayyyyyyyyyy, counselor...

Ill take it you dont know, nor really care what he is charged with. neat stuff.

And Ill take it you really do not care about any of the facts in the issue. Double neat stuff.

obstruction and perjury ... I reckon perjury is different than lying in your twisted sense ... you asked if he was lying ... what next, chico ... muh muh muh russiagate isn't obstruction...

nuts is on muh pins and muh needles...

go for it, mario...

(11-05-2025 12:46 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 09:18 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm devastated.

And you're disingenuous. And not worth debating, due to that. So I will continue to do what I do.

Yes, you have *absolutely* continued to run away from providing any specific lefty things, and *absolutely* continued to yammer empty rhetorical generalizations.

Neat stuff, mi amigo.

I am not surprised in the very least you will continue that, and that you proudly proclaim you will continue to do so. Lolz.

Here's a fact for you. One of us tells the truth. That would be me.

And I now have pointed out 3 lefty positions, just tonight.

Not supporting a mid cycle redistricting is now a leftist political philosophy? Cool cool.

Pointing out that Texas pulled the trigger first, by prostrating themselves to Trumps impulses is now a leftist political philosophy? Cool cool again.

In terms of actual political philosophy, you are simply pointing out what a utter retard you are.

Political philosophy -- here's kind of a partial laundry list, moron -- Income equality; higher tax rates on the wealthy; government spending on social programs and infrastructure; stronger regulations on business; unimpeded pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants; moratorium on deportations or prosecutions of undocumented immigrants; free, public education at all levels; in favor of gun control laws like background checks or waiting periods before buying a gun; banning automatic weapons; and disallowing concealed weapons; preferring to impede economic activity that may create jobs but could potentially harm the environment; expansive welfare state; complete opposition to voter ID laws.

Your list -- thinking that mid-cycle districting wasn't healthy and simply leads to pissant on demand voting arms races.

I cannot believe that you have graduated above mouth breathing.

(11-05-2025 04:00 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Asking those questions is a leftist POV to you ? Or do you just have an urge to post meme responses to anything and everything?

Quote:you don't think his involvement with muh muh muh russiagate isn't enough to prove he's a blatant liar .......... ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmkayyyyyyyyyy, counselor...

Ill take it you dont know, nor really care what he is charged with. neat stuff.

And Ill take it you really do not care about any of the facts in the issue. Double neat stuff.

obstruction and perjury ... I reckon perjury is different than lying in your twisted sense ... you asked if he was lying ... what next, chico ... muh muh muh russiagate isn't obstruction...

nuts is on muh pins and muh needles...

go for it, mario...

Nope, perjury would be lying under oath. You are correct. Now to the facts -- that is, what was the question asked under oath, and the answer.

Just wanted to point something out. Pretty much EVERYONE, if you're being honest, expected Hillary to win, even team trump.

(11-05-2025 06:24 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 04:00 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Asking those questions is a leftist POV to you ? Or do you just have an urge to post meme responses to anything and everything?

Quote:you don't think his involvement with muh muh muh russiagate isn't enough to prove he's a blatant liar .......... ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmkayyyyyyyyyy, counselor...

Ill take it you dont know, nor really care what he is charged with. neat stuff.

And Ill take it you really do not care about any of the facts in the issue. Double neat stuff.

obstruction and perjury ... I reckon perjury is different than lying in your twisted sense ... you asked if he was lying ... what next, chico ... muh muh muh russiagate isn't obstruction...

nuts is on muh pins and muh needles...

go for it, mario...

Nope, perjury would be lying under oath. You are correct. Now to the facts -- that is, what was the question asked under oath, and the answer.

lying about leaking ... I know where you're going with the 'he said he said' argument ... however, his participation in muh russiagate is the damning nugget to his credibility...

like I said, he's going to be acquitted due to a NoVA jury ... I ain' doin' this shite with yo' arse...

I want to see him spend all his time and $$$ due to the same bs his corrupt arse tried to do to too many ... yeah, I'm an eye-for-eye guy ... sue me!

(11-05-2025 07:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Just wanted to point something out. Pretty much EVERYONE, if you're being honest, expected Hillary to win, even team trump.

not nuts, HoD, and USTAMarineVet09 ... nor the folks who voted that had enough of status quo fk ewes up the arse...

we understand ewes that love a comfy blankie searching for the next prey...

(11-04-2025 08:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 08:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, it is, Tanq. And you slant your comments that way practically all the time.

Maybe the disconnect is you don't think those comments are ones the left would make. Well, most of the rest of us do. You always question the Rs, not the Ds. You always seem to criticize the right, not the left.

I mean, it's so obvious to us, it's laughable. You have always done that as long as I have been on this site.

You're either immensely unaware of how your comments are received here, or you're just being disingenuous. Which is it?

Care to point out where in my comments here I have "criticize[d] the right"?

The comments are actually neutral on their face. But to you they are "ones the left would make."

I think we have the real issue at hand. It appears that in 3Aville, any comment not in line with 3Aville is 'left leaning'. That explains a whole lot, to tell the truth.

Not to mention you being dumber than dirt in not being able to back up your incessant comments with any instances, and you being too fing lazy to actually back up your kneejerk predispostions. But you be you, punkin.

While I agree that many of your comments could be construed as neutral if examined at just the right angle with the light hitting them just right, Andy's comments contained not one word of true disparagement, not one instance of name-calling, yet your reaction is hateful, almost violent, and ridiculous. Far from neutral...

And you wonder at your reception here. I put you on ignore to avoid being dragged into these ridiculous exchanges, but for some reason I saw this one. It's understandable that you are constantly on the defensive here, but have you ever asked yourself with any honesty why you are received here so poorly? I, for one, couldn't care less whether you identify as left, right, in the middle, or off on another planet somewhere, but you can't expect to come here throwing darts at everyone around you with whom you may disagree and expect a warm welcome. I understand that you have had some serious darts thrown at you also, but reacting in kind isn't productive at all. I've made an effort to be more civil; you should try it. I know I'm not perfect at it; I slip up at times, but no one expects perfection.

While I value your legal expertise and your opinions, right or wrong though they may be, it's not so valuable that I have to eat shite in order to be privy to it without a tongue lashing.