(09-10-2025 05:47 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  Go back to BlueSky.
Bluesky Leftists Mock and Celebrate Assassination of Charlie Kirk — ‘Going Directly to Hell’

The irony is Charlie is absolutely in heaven with His Lord and Savior at this very moment. He was as genuine of a true believer in the entire politician spectrum and shared the Gospel more often than anything else.

And where does everyone think those God hating, Christian hating, Bible hating loons of BlueSky are headed at 1000mph?

Does this fool really think only crazed Republicans have guns?

Did this clown comment on the knifing attack in Charlotte?

Seems very selective outrage about mode of murder.

(09-10-2025 05:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  My 17 year old daughter walked in from school a little earlier, and she was crying... it was about this.

She followed him and she spoke about how he influenced her in good ways.

I didnt even know that she followed him. That was the reach he had.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I actually didn't know who he was although I had heard of Turning Point. My son did and texted me about it. And he's less conservative than I am.

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Well, you always were a sick piece of $hit.

Gun control is bullcrap. Only criminals would have guns after that, not law-abiding citizens.

Game Controller Code Dude: Spare me your fake moral browbeating.

(09-10-2025 05:54 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  My 17 year old daughter walked in from school a little earlier, and she was crying... it was about this.

She followed him and she spoke about how he influenced her in good ways.

I didnt even know that she followed him. That was the reach he had.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I actually didn't know who he was although I had heard of Turning Point. My son did and texted me about it. And he's less conservative than I am.

He was all over social media

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2025 05:53 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

Open carrying of guns on campus is NOT legal moron.

Don't mind him. He's a pot-stirring troll. (You know, way worse than you since you're funny and stuff.)

This is 100000000000000000% correct

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2025 05:56 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:53 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

Open carrying of guns on campus is NOT legal moron.

Don't mind him. He's a pot-stirring troll. (You know, way worse than you since you're funny and stuff.)

Thank you, I needed that laugh.

(09-10-2025 03:52 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  They hated him because he told the truth. He always set the Liberals straight with common sense answers and those satan lovers didn't like that. So sad, so young and now he's gone. RIP Charlie, you're in a better place right now.

Truth, very well put.

(09-10-2025 05:57 PM)maximus Wrote:  This is 100000000000000000% correct

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Yep. (That's all I'm going to say. Yep.)

Bartlett: You're welcome.

(09-10-2025 05:53 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

Open carrying of guns on campus is NOT legal moron.

Utah made it legal this Summer.

' Wrote:Utah lawmakers updated state law governing concealed weapons during the 2025 General Session.

Under the changes in HB 128, which went into effect on May 7, individuals who are 18 years old or older and have a current Utah concealed weapon permit (CWP) may carry a weapon on campus, including in an “open” fashion


“Our highest priority is preserving public safety on campus,” said Keith Squires, chief safety officer. “As a subdivision of the state, the University of Utah enforces state law, including concealed weapon rules. Equally important is our role in educating members of our campus community about how to responsibly carry a concealed weapon on campus and how to engage with roommates, professors and others to avoid conflicts and misunderstandings.”

Utah has been an open or “constitutional carry” state since 2021. Prior to the passage of HB 128 during the 2025 Utah Legislature, those who wanted to carry a firearm on campus were required to keep it concealed. The new law makes it clear that Utahns 18 years or older, who have a concealed weapon permit, may carry a firearm concealed or openly on campus. University of Utah Police will confirm that those carrying openly on campus have a concealed weapon permit.

Here are some frequently asked questions about firearms on campus:

(09-10-2025 04:08 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  What do you expect from Marxists? This is what they do.

Yep, it's all scripted, they've done it all over the world.

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

I think this 2nd post warrants a ban.

The first was totally inappropriate at this time. Doubling down should get him banned.

(09-10-2025 05:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  My 17 year old daughter walked in from school a little earlier, and she was crying... it was about this.

She followed him and she spoke about how he influenced her in good ways.

I didnt even know that she followed him. That was the reach he had.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Same thing here, one of the boys called us about the news. He also followed Charlie Kirk. We already had heard the news but didn't know that he also followed him. It really is a sad day for his family and this country.

(09-10-2025 05:45 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  As many of us already knew, the left is filled with people who are gleeful over this and now we see them right here in this thread.

Cause the left is filled with a thousand mental hospitals worth of should be institutionalized patients.

The Crazy.

(09-10-2025 06:01 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

I think this 2nd post warrants a ban.

The first was totally inappropriate at this time. Doubling down should get him banned.

Yes, it should. So let's report it to the mods.

(09-10-2025 05:56 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:54 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  My 17 year old daughter walked in from school a little earlier, and she was crying... it was about this.

She followed him and she spoke about how he influenced her in good ways.

I didnt even know that she followed him. That was the reach he had.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I actually didn't know who he was although I had heard of Turning Point. My son did and texted me about it. And he's less conservative than I am.

He was all over social media

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Well my son is on social media. I don't do it.

I can't believe the scum popping up in this thread. Your time will come. Rest assured.