(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

(09-10-2025 02:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:15 PM)hburg Wrote:  Interesting to see those on the left NOT condemn the shooting or shooter thus far.....

They cant. In fact, much like Irina's violent murderer---they will---if anything, express sympathy for the criminal. This "excuse the criminal" "blame the victiem" philosophy for protected groups (notice, it only applies to protected groups---a straight white male crimial is just a peice of garbage who should be jailed without a trial accroding to proper lib justice) is why Chicago and other liberal cities are the crap holes they have become.

Y'all are just starting to figure this out?? Marxists in this country are starting to shift away from the largely non-violent culture war they've waged against us since the mid 90's to a more traditional class warfare complete with its necessary violence. It's a shift from a war of position to a war of maneuvers and it will only get worse. They are praying that they can stir up a civil war in this country...

The left would be up in arms, out in the streets rioting by now had this been one of theirs shot by a conservative. This is the kind of vile, cowardly, and evil outrageousness we can expect from the unhinged left from here on out. Whoever did this should be given the death sentence, if they catch him that is. He just robbed a young, happy, healthy family of its father and husband, their provider and their protector. And there will be those on the left celebrating the event.

He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)hburg Wrote:  Total scum

Oh look leftists being leftists

Total garbage

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Quote:A fire’s been lit under the powder keg. Maybe tonight George Soros and his son are drunk on their so-called “victory,” thinking with this clear message that their universities are off-limits and right-wing voices won’t be allowed to rise.

But with this move, they’ve just taken the game to the next stage—maybe even the final stage.

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

You know what? Screw you. I'm glad I had GTS take away your mod powers. (Yeah, that's right. It was me, son.)

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

Get lost clown

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

**** you! You Maggot eating **** head!

(09-10-2025 02:31 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:25 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:24 PM)b2b Wrote:  I'm not going to post the link to the close up here. I'll just say I don't see how anybody could survive what happened.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using CSNbbs mobile app

Agreed. I didn't post it either because it is very disturbing. At this point everyone needs to stop with the violent rhetoric.

At this point? Everyone? How about prog filth stop shooting people.

They should, but the activists on both sides should stop with the rhetoric. How many times have we seen kill all the lefties on this board? It needs to stop. Both sides. Politicians, activists, or just idiots on a message board.

Get back to us the next time some crazed right wing radical shoots and kills a prominent young democrat. GTFO with that crap. Typical fence sitting CYA "moderate".

As many of us already knew, the left is filled with people who are gleeful over this and now we see them right here in this thread.

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

Go back to BlueSky.
Bluesky Leftists Mock and Celebrate Assassination of Charlie Kirk — ‘Going Directly to Hell’

(09-10-2025 04:36 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 02:48 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Here is what the filth wont admit

They are happy about this.

That is a fact.

Oh---its MUCH worse than that. Its not so much that the left is secretly happy about this---its more that this is basically the unspoken PLAN of the Leftist media. Thats the real dirty little secret. They know there are enough people with untreated mental issues in the US that if they pump out enough incendiary hate pointed at their politcal enemies---some nut case out there--- thinking he is a hero---will kill the lefts politcal opponents. Kirk isnt even the number one target---he's just got a lot less security.

I'm afraid you are absolutely right. I'm sure that is their intent with DJT.

I have no idea if this has been posted here or not, but someone found a "nonbinary" UVU student that said "something big is going to happen today" when Charlie Kirk comes to the school.

Funny how nutjobs pop up out of nowhere on here to throw out some BS when things like this happen.

It's like they are celebrating what happened. Low lifes.

(09-10-2025 05:41 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Kruciff, the biggest ***** on this board returns after someone is assassinated to dance on their graves.

May you and someone you love suffer the same fate.

Already have, thanks.

(09-10-2025 05:50 PM)--- Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:41 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Kruciff, the biggest ***** on this board returns after someone is assassinated to dance on their graves.

May you and someone you love suffer the same fate.

Already have, thanks.

F off coward. Loser.

(09-10-2025 05:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Funny how nutjobs pop up out of nowhere on here to throw out some BS when things like this happen.

It's like they are celebrating what happened. Low lifes.

Of course, they are. They justify anything and everything for their cause (or at least the cause they've been brainwashed into fighting for), no matter the consequences. I've known that for years.

(09-10-2025 05:50 PM)--- Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:41 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Kruciff, the biggest ***** on this board returns after someone is assassinated to dance on their graves.

May you and someone you love suffer the same fate.

Already have, thanks.

Nuking your account on here isn't the same thing, coward. Not even close.

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:10 PM)hburg Wrote:  

I don't see how its not a professional hit. And its designed to be a message to everyone.

It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

If it was up to me, every single place in America would be an open carry space.

Open carry laws do not kill people, murders and assassins do and they by definition do not give a rats ass about laws. Many of the deadliest places in America have the strictest gun laws in the country, yet are filled every week with gun violence.

You have to be a special kind of ignorant not to understand this simple truth.

Then if it was up to you a lot more people would be gunned down just like this in this open carry space.

The purpose of guns is to kill things. Having as many guns in as many hand means more people that can gun someone down like this. Letting those people straight up open carry wherever they want means the access to gun down whoever.


If you think we can't stop criminals from getting something that is illegal than what's the point of laws at all? If criminals wanting to break a law is argument to not have a specific law then why is any other law different? A functioning country creates laws and then those laws are enforced by the police who in a stable country have a monopoly on the use of force.


The US has by far the most shootings of any developed country because of the easy access to guns. To illustrate how easy it is to access guns in this country Mexican cartels buy American guns and smuggle them south into Mexico. Literally some of the most violence criminals in the world find it easier to obtain guns here than jump through the laws at home in a country that is supposedly less stable and functioning than this one.

(09-10-2025 05:32 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  It doesn't take a professional assassin to be able to bring a gun onto a campus where lawmakers have decided to allow open carrying of guns.

Open carrying of guns on campus is NOT legal moron.