(04-15-2025 06:01 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 05:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 12:41 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  I'll trade you "any person" for "shall not be infringed".

Do you think I am an anti- 2A guy? Lolz.

Ill take the literal meaning of both of them. Funny that. Im not politically selective in deciding to **** on one part of the Constitution and support another. Im one of those dudes that think all of it needs to be followed.


But glad to see that you think that you seemingly think the fight that finally won out in Heller, and McDonald, and Bruen is such a chip on the shoulder to ignore the issue of "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Cool cool.

So if they drag his ass back, sit him down at a folding table, let him plead his case, order him deported 5 minutes later, then walk him back across the border where he entered.....

You'll stfu?

Absolutely -- give him the due process. If in the process they decide to ship him out, that is what it is. Within the rules.

They could have done that within the rules for any of the 2 planeloads. Notice, hearing, and if an adverse ruling -- no problem in shipping them out. Ive been crystal clear all along. As have most people criticizing the issue.

(04-15-2025 04:09 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 04:00 PM)shere khan Wrote:  [b]If an army stormed the border some idiots would scream muh due process. You cant shoot them.

We lived in a country with a great deal of warped stupid people.

We need a war.

Only if they were able to step a single foot on our sovereign soil...

Then muh due process

That's the problem here, these millions of single male invaders were allowed in on purpose and even flown in under the ridiculous guise of muh asylum, no shots fired invasion.

Strawman ******* argument bolded above. Different set of procedures, different rules. But leave it to the terminally ignorant to blather about it as such.

And Ill take it a step further -- if there *was* an actual invasion by a nation, or a war with a nation, the President has almost unfettered power to deport not just the 'invaders', but *any* national of that country we are at war with.

The ignorance and strawman arguments here are just mindboggling.

(04-15-2025 06:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 06:01 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 05:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 12:41 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  I'll trade you "any person" for "shall not be infringed".

Do you think I am an anti- 2A guy? Lolz.

Ill take the literal meaning of both of them. Funny that. Im not politically selective in deciding to **** on one part of the Constitution and support another. Im one of those dudes that think all of it needs to be followed.


But glad to see that you think that you seemingly think the fight that finally won out in Heller, and McDonald, and Bruen is such a chip on the shoulder to ignore the issue of "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Cool cool.

So if they drag his ass back, sit him down at a folding table, let him plead his case, order him deported 5 minutes later, then walk him back across the border where he entered.....

You'll stfu?

Absolutely -- give him the due process. If in the process they decide to ship him out, that is what it is. Within the rules.

They could have done that within the rules for any of the 2 planeloads. Notice, hearing, and if an adverse ruling -- no problem in shipping them out. Ive been crystal clear all along. As have most people criticizing the issue.

My god, ill call Trump myself to do this so you will stfu




Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

yes, this is the hill the dipsh*ts want to die on.....

(04-15-2025 06:12 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 04:09 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 04:00 PM)shere khan Wrote:  [b]If an army stormed the border some idiots would scream muh due process. You cant shoot them.

We lived in a country with a great deal of warped stupid people.

We need a war.

Only if they were able to step a single foot on our sovereign soil...

Then muh due process

That's the problem here, these millions of single male invaders were allowed in on purpose and even flown in under the ridiculous guise of muh asylum, no shots fired invasion.

Strawman ******* argument bolded above. Different set of procedures, different rules. But leave it to the terminally ignorant to blather about it as such.

And Ill take it a step further -- if there *was* an actual invasion by a nation, or a war with a nation, the President has almost unfettered power to deport not just the 'invaders', but *any* national of that country we are at war with.

The ignorance and strawman arguments here are just mindboggling.

So 12-15 million in 4 years isn't an invasion?

WTF is it then?

Ohhh nevermind, it was purposeful treason

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(04-15-2025 06:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Lunatics

(04-15-2025 06:12 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 04:09 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 04:00 PM)shere khan Wrote:  [b]If an army stormed the border some idiots would scream muh due process. You cant shoot them.

We lived in a country with a great deal of warped stupid people.

We need a war.

Only if they were able to step a single foot on our sovereign soil...

Then muh due process

That's the problem here, these millions of single male invaders were allowed in on purpose and even flown in under the ridiculous guise of muh asylum, no shots fired invasion.

Strawman ******* argument bolded above. Different set of procedures, different rules. But leave it to the terminally ignorant to blather about it as such.

And Ill take it a step further -- if there *was* an actual invasion by a nation, or a war with a nation, the President has almost unfettered power to deport not just the 'invaders', but *any* national of that country we are at war with.

The ignorance and strawman arguments here are just mindboggling.

You are just wrong and continue your journey into madness
Carry on

Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin Shuts Down Lying ABC Hack With a Masterful Response When He Tries Covering for Alleged MS-13 Gangster Abrego Garcia (VIDEO)

(04-15-2025 06:47 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Hopefully, they have DEI pilots

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(04-15-2025 06:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 06:01 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 05:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 12:41 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  I'll trade you "any person" for "shall not be infringed".

Do you think I am an anti- 2A guy? Lolz.

Ill take the literal meaning of both of them. Funny that. Im not politically selective in deciding to **** on one part of the Constitution and support another. Im one of those dudes that think all of it needs to be followed.


But glad to see that you think that you seemingly think the fight that finally won out in Heller, and McDonald, and Bruen is such a chip on the shoulder to ignore the issue of "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Cool cool.

So if they drag his ass back, sit him down at a folding table, let him plead his case, order him deported 5 minutes later, then walk him back across the border where he entered.....

You'll stfu?

Absolutely -- give him the due process. If in the process they decide to ship him out, that is what it is. Within the rules.

They could have done that within the rules for any of the 2 planeloads. Notice, hearing, and if an adverse ruling -- no problem in shipping them out. Ive been crystal clear all along. As have most people criticizing the issue.

Within the rules? Funny, I don't recall you raising hell when Biden let in maybe 20M illegals. Against the rules.

Trump is about to bypass the judges again. Hes going to offer a plane ticket and stipend for the illegals to deport themselves.

It will be their choice.

A. Stay here, get due process, and possibly land in an el salvadoran prison

B. Take the plane ticket and stipend and control where you end up.

Exactly my point. We ignored immigration laws to let in maybe 20M unvetted illegals, and NOW the Dems are about enforcing immigration laws. Cherry picking. They came in illegally, so I have no issue with them going back the same way.

If a burglar breaks into my home at night, he's not going to get due process. He's going to get shot.

Quote:Hey, Senator
@ChrisVanHollen

You are more concerned about an alleged MS-13 gang member, illegal alien in El Salvador than your own Maryland constituent who was M*RDERED *by an illegal alien?*

And yet, all you talk about is Kilmar Abrego Garcia, not Rachel Morin.

From a former Marylander - you are simply a piece of human garbage, Senator Van Hollen.

Cancel your trip and go visit Rachel Morin's family instead of trying to save an illegal alien from deportation.

Or maybe say *ANYTHING* about what happened here. Say an illegal alien did this. Say it's a problem.

Quote:WOW, EVEN CNN? Chief legal correspondent Paula Reid goes on the news and says Trump is *NOT* violating the Supreme Court ruling by not flying Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to the U.S.

Will Democrats listen now?

"They did NOT order the administration to return him to the United States. They said that they need to facilitate his return. They could have said 'we order him returned,' but they didn't do that."

@StephenM
and
@MarcoRubio
said this yesterday in the Oval Office, and so did AG Bondi.

"The Supreme Court appeared to defer to the executive branch given that this is an international matter, and you see, yes, it does look a little bit like a semantic game, but they are playing within the bounds of what the Supreme Court ruled."

"So no, they are not defying this order."

What do you do now, Democrats, when you lost CNN?

Total embarassment.

Dude would get you the electric chair for a traffic ticket

Worst
Lawyer
Even

(04-15-2025 06:47 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Muh Gosh

Please, please, please come down on the “rescue” side of alien gangbangers.

This couldn’t be more of a bag of gold lucky charms than that kinda stupidity.

The LAST people that want the gangbangers they fled from are legal immigrants, yet the loons wanna let em all stroll on in and set up shop like they did in El Sav and Vz.

Never mind the Cubans and Haitians, they don’t have the cash for the guns, yet.

Totally un-vetted, illiterate in English, uneducated, unskilled and unable to support themselves without crime or fleecing American taxpayers for welfare and “programs”.

Good plan, Loons.
Your paltry 21% might get you to single digits with this kind of stupidity.

The dumb never ceases to amaze.





Y’all starting to figure this out yet?






Suckers