(07-29-2020 04:16 PM)MidknightWhiskey Wrote:  

(07-29-2020 04:09 PM)TerryD Wrote:  

(07-29-2020 03:29 PM)MidknightWhiskey Wrote:  

https://www.si.com/college/tmg/_storyPre...6051776052

Quote:As an enticement to accept that, the ACC added the offer of a full ACC revenue payout, which combined with Notre Dame's share of its television contract with NBC would be a boost in income for ND of more than 35 million dollars.

For that, however, he ACC clearly wants Notre Dame to accept a permanent position in football sooner rather than later, a move which would guarantee ND's financial athletic security.

They're going for it, if what they're offering in the article is true I think they pull it off.

But it does not fit the "ND is greedy" narrative, giving up the home game revenues like that to show loyalty to Navy.

I think you replied to the wrong post. But I'll respond anyways. The schedule announcement does say the non-conference games must be played at home or in the teams state. The game would have to move to South Bend and likely just flip next years to be home for Navy.

Yes on both counts.

I responded to the wrong post and I just saw that and was about to post it.

"ACC schools can select one non-conference game, but it must be played in a state of an ACC school.

Maryland, where the Naval Academy is located, does not have an ACC program within its borders. By these rules, Notre Dame cannot face Navy in Annapolis."