(12-18-2019 07:47 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-18-2019 12:51 AM)GoOwls111 Wrote:  

(12-17-2019 08:52 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(12-16-2019 03:21 PM)rebar619 Wrote:  

(12-16-2019 02:31 PM)Atlanta Wrote:  All of this.... We need one team IF they add value, no more. Added value is the key, if adding 3 can add value then go west - BYU, Boise & SDSU. IF they don't want to come, OK too.

If this was a legit possibility for all sports I think SDSU would be in without question.

We can dream though.

Until the AAC does something regarding membership dream is all we can do...

BTW... If the AAC is in tact after July 1st 2025, the AAC will get more money by just adding one of the teams sitting there dreaming of bigger and better things (SDSU, BYU, AF, Army or even Buffalo or GSU).

All of those schools have been winners on the FB field except one... GSU. We don't need to add a perennial loser.

(12-19-2019 08:06 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(12-18-2019 11:52 PM)GoOwls111 Wrote:  

(12-18-2019 09:34 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(12-18-2019 12:51 AM)GoOwls111 Wrote:  

(12-17-2019 08:52 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  We can dream though.

Until the AAC does something regarding membership dream is all we can do...

BTW... If the AAC is in tact after July 1st 2025, the AAC will get more money by just adding one of the teams sitting there dreaming of bigger and better things (SDSU, BYU, AF, Army or even Buffalo or GSU).

"If" the AAC is still in tact in its current format in 2025, it will mean that a rule got passed allowing for us to stay at 11, and after 5 years of that, I kinda doubt we would expand unless one team REALLY stepped up.

Boise St is a good football team, but their overall sports program and academics, along with location leaves much to be desired.

I think we will not expand unless Air Force or Army decide to join. BYU isnt coming, so point in ever putting in their name.... and the other names you mentioned are laughable. The market has spoken and both of those teams get less than $500K a year for their TV rights.... and they just arent any good.

If we are gonna take a program that has potential but isnt a big name, there are plenty of better options.

Technically we don't need a rule change from The NCAA to stay at 11 as long as we have 2 divisions with unbalanced schedule or pay a 10 game round robin conference schedule, The 10 game conference schedule will never happen unless Navy is happy playing only Army and ND in OOC Schedule. Both scenarios will allow the AAC to have a CCG.

We are playing under a 2 year waiver in this format, with no promise that it will be renewed.
We will need another team, or a rule change to keep going. Dont believe me, then why did Aresco have to go get a waiver?

Actually we don't need a rule change to keep going with 11, we would just have to play uneven divisions to keep a CCG.