(10-27-2026 01:11 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 10:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 10:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:26 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Well, there's a reason they are hell bent NOW with releasing the files but lacked any of that fervor during the last administration. And no, none of that, "they couldn't legal release anything" BS as we ALL know that's a lie. Leaks happen all the time. Pretty easy to read between the lines when it comes to the Dem timing in all this.

A leak isn't a release, dude. During pretty much all of Biden, this was still an active investigation.

And again, let's just have a credible investigation. All anyone is rally asking.

Point still stands. Again, there will be no "credible investigation" because BOTH parties and their donors would get burnt. Again, there is only ONE united party when it comes to anything Epstein related. Regarding Biden, it's still an active investigation now, so that excuse holds no water.

Except that it does because Garland was a choir boy...not the shill that trump has in place.

Biden had no shills in place? To think not is laughable. Anyway, this goes back even before the Biden admin, back to the Clinton admin. No way they didn't know about it and did nothing.

Again with the logical fallacies! No, I never said Biden had no shills in place. Only that Garland was not one. I know you probably ignored it, but there were next to nobody on the left who was happy with Garland who refused to do much of anything anyone wanted. ****, even Biden wasn't happy with him on how he dealt with Hunter.