Sure would be nice if we could ever get to the bottom of the Epstein files.

And again, I don't care if Bill Clinton or any other left side politician was involved, they ALL need to be dealt with.

Quote:Washington, D.C. (October 26, 2026)—Today, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, released a sweeping new Committee staff report, “‘We Have Certain Things in Common, Jeffrey’: The Case Against donald trump Emerging in the Epstein Files and DOJ’s Desperate Efforts to Cover it Up,” detailing evidence involving 11 women, five of whom directly accuse donald trump of rape or sexual assault in Jeffrey Epstein’s close company or presence. The report concludes that, based on the available evidence and witness testimony, trump and Paolo Zampolli—who until recently served as a senior trump Administration official and diplomat—[b]may have been co-conspirators in Jeffrey Epstein’s conspiracy to traffic and abuse young women in the 1990s.[/b]

Drawing on interviews conducted by Committee staff, survivor accounts, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) records and documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the report traces striking similarities in the stories of women abused by Jeffrey Epstein and donald trump. With one exception, each assault or instance of sexual misconduct occurred between 1992 and 1997, in New York and Palm Beach, and many of the victims were closely tied to the modeling industry and Zampolli.

Judiciary Democrats’ Report Details Mounting Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein’s Criminal Activities and DOJ’s Cover-Up; Specific Accounts Involving 11 Women Provide More Evidence of Potential Sex Crimes

lulz....so desperate....

Maybe the Dems should’ve focused more on Epstein files and Trump when they had the White House and congress rather than bogus law fare and assassination attempts


Or


It could be possible they did, Trump wasn’t in there, lots of dem pedos are so they must be protected.

Just a thought. But since the Dems offer zilch to American citizens other than higher inflation, higher taxes, open borders to let criminals in, they opted to punt Epstein

(10-26-2026 12:26 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  lulz....so desperate....

When is he ever not desperate?

(10-26-2026 12:40 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Maybe the Dems should’ve focused more on Epstein files and Trump when they had the White House and congress rather than bogus law fare and assassination attempts


Or


It could be possible they did, Trump wasn’t in there, lots of dem pedos are so they must be protected.

Just a thought. But since the Dems offer zilch to American citizens other than higher inflation, higher taxes, open borders to let criminals in, they opted to punt Epstein

As I said earlier,

Anyone who thinks that the Democrats are going to fix the problems that THEY CREATED under the Biden administration needs to be put into a locked unit, be force medicated, and kept away from the general public.

I agree with Tom that all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly. It will never happen, unfortunately.

Rich, powerful men typically can get away with ... well, literally murder.

(10-26-2026 02:28 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I agree with Tom that all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly. It will never happen, unfortunately.

Rich, powerful men typically can get away with ... well, literally murder.

"all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly"

You know Bill, I believe everyone on this Board feels the same way.

What about the Women that were "involved". Do they get a pass? We KNOW there is nothing there on Trump do the 4 years the Biden administration was in office and did nothing. Only the stupid repeat "Trump is a Pedophile".

(10-26-2026 02:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-26-2026 02:28 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I agree with Tom that all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly. It will never happen, unfortunately.

Rich, powerful men typically can get away with ... well, literally murder.

"all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly"

You know Bill, I believe everyone on this Board feels the same way.

Tom doesn't believe it.

To him, it's all just a ploy to get Trump, as usual.

And Tom doesn't want Democrats to be punished.

Only Republicans.

(10-26-2026 03:00 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  What about the Women that were "involved". Do they get a pass? We KNOW there is nothing there on Trump do the 4 years the Biden administration was in office and did nothing. Only the stupid repeat "Trump is a Pedophile".

He's not a pedophile.

Pedophilia is sexual attraction directed toward a prepubescent child, generally defined as age 13 years or younger.

Why is there an overwhelming assumption that things in the Epstien files are true?

How do we know they haven't been altered? Or were blackmail lies from the beginning?

Where are these women now? Why didn't they come forward two elections ago?

The whole thing smells. ALL OF IT.

So according to Tom, Trump is NOT a pedophile now.

Also, the fact that Tom wrote out exactly what a pedophile is seems very suspicious, IMO.

(10-26-2026 02:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-26-2026 02:28 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I agree with Tom that all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly. It will never happen, unfortunately.

Rich, powerful men typically can get away with ... well, literally murder.

"all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly"

You know Bill, I believe everyone on this Board feels the same way.

I agree with you, RBD.

I just felt the urge to get my self-required daily "muh both sides" comment/theme post on the board.

(10-26-2026 04:11 PM)Claw Wrote:  Why is there an overwhelming assumption that things in the Epstien files are true?

How do we know they haven't been altered? Or were blackmail lies from the beginning?

Where are these women now? Why didn't they come forward two elections ago?

The whole thing smells. ALL OF IT.

I wouldn't be surprised if lots of these accusations are complete B.S.

And I wouldn't be surprised if the bulk of the claims are true.

I'm open to either scenario.

(10-26-2026 04:11 PM)Claw Wrote:  Why is there an overwhelming assumption that things in the Epstien files are true?

How do we know they haven't been altered? Or were blackmail lies from the beginning?

Where are these women now? Why didn't they come forward two elections ago?

The whole thing smells. ALL OF IT.

I went and read part of that report. It used the word "may", all this is, is more smoke & mirrors. That's all the dem's have.

(10-26-2026 04:11 PM)Claw Wrote:  Why is there an overwhelming assumption that things in the Epstien files are true?

How do we know they haven't been altered? Or were blackmail lies from the beginning?

Where are these women now? Why didn't they come forward two elections ago?

The whole thing smells. ALL OF IT.

I guess you're not aware, but it's not exactly easy for a young woman who was abused to come forward against anyone, especially against someone with a lot of money, notoriety, and power.

And as to how we prove or find out? Well, for starters, you need an actual investigation and not the stonewalling and obstruction these poor women have dealt with FOR YEARS!

Quote:A federal judge ruled Monday that the Department of Justice’s firing last year of New York federal prosecutor Maurene Comey, the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, was unlawful.

Judge Jesse Furman, in his ruling, also granted Maurene Comey retroactive reinstatement and back pay as an assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York from her termination on July 16, 2025, through Dec. 20, 2025, when the judge inferred she accepted another job.

The DOJ said it would appeal Furman’s ruling in which the judge rejected the department’s arguments that the attorney general had authority to dismiss Comey without cause. The case is in in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

Comey’s lawyers, in a statement, said, “This hard-earned victory belongs to Ms. Comey, to all civil servants, and to all fighting for the rule of law.”

“As the Court correctly held, to accept the government’s argument about unlimited executive power ‘would be to unsettle the very equilibrium established by this Nation’s constitutional system,’” the lawyers said. “This decision reaffirms our bedrock system of checks and balances: the President is not above the law.”

Before her termination, Comey was involved in a series of high-profile federal prosecutions, including ones against the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell and Sean “Diddy” Combs.

trump DOJ unlawfully fired Epstein prosecutor Maurene Comey, judge rules

Including 4 years under Biden?

(10-27-2026 07:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-26-2026 04:11 PM)Claw Wrote:  Why is there an overwhelming assumption that things in the Epstien files are true?

How do we know they haven't been altered? Or were blackmail lies from the beginning?

Where are these women now? Why didn't they come forward two elections ago?

The whole thing smells. ALL OF IT.

I guess you're not aware, but it's not exactly easy for a young woman who was abused to come forward against anyone, especially against someone with a lot of money, notoriety, and power.

And as to how we prove or find out? Well, for starters, you need an actual investigation and not the stonewalling and obstruction these poor women have dealt with FOR YEARS!

These women are in their 50's now. If they wanted to come forward they have had well over a decade to accuse Trump the candidate. It smells of election showboating. Not that both sides don't do that, but this one is really weak.