(10-26-2026 02:28 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I agree with Tom that all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly. It will never happen, unfortunately.

Rich, powerful men typically can get away with ... well, literally murder.

WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

When will these IDIOTS who are only looking for political fodder FINALLY TELL THE TRUTH.

ALL OF THESE FILES WERE DESTROYED YEARS AGO.

Stop chasing a ghost of Christmas Past.

JFK FILES 101

"Judiciary Democrats"

lol, no way that report is nothing more than yet another witch hunt.

Anway, where was this type of report during the Biden administration?

(10-27-2026 08:15 AM)VA49er Wrote:  "Judiciary Democrats"

lol, no way that report is nothing more than yet another witch hunt.

Anway, where was this type of report during the Biden administration?

Nonexistent. Because they actually don't care about the victims.

(10-27-2026 08:17 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:15 AM)VA49er Wrote:  "Judiciary Democrats"

lol, no way that report is nothing more than yet another witch hunt.

Anway, where was this type of report during the Biden administration?

Nonexistent. Because they actually don't care about the victims.

Exactly right, GC.

To the left, victims of horrible things like this are a means to an end.

Let’s release the entire unredacted file(s) and let the lawsuits, arrests, and trials begin, regardless of who is implicated.

(10-27-2026 08:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Let’s release the entire unredacted file(s) and let the lawsuits, arrests, and trials begin, regardless of who is implicated.

I'm game. And if Trump actually is implicated in them as a sexual abuser of teenagers (he won't be), then may he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like everyone else in there.

(10-27-2026 08:29 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Let’s release the entire unredacted file(s) and let the lawsuits, arrests, and trials begin, regardless of who is implicated.

I'm game. And if Trump actually is implicated in them as a sexual abuser of teenagers (he won't be), then may he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like everyone else in there.

I agree 100%. However, when it comes to the Epstein files, there's only ONE party, not Repubs and Dems. Anyone saying otherwise, particularly the Dems in this case, are simply playing partisan politics. As we've seen here, people are dumb enough to believe it.

(10-27-2026 09:09 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:29 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Let’s release the entire unredacted file(s) and let the lawsuits, arrests, and trials begin, regardless of who is implicated.

I'm game. And if Trump actually is implicated in them as a sexual abuser of teenagers (he won't be), then may he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like everyone else in there.

I agree 100%. However, when it comes to the Epstein files, there's only ONE party, not Repubs and Dems. Anyone saying otherwise, particularly the Dems in this case, are simply playing partisan politics. As we've seen here, people are dumb enough to believe it.

What dem is saying only or mostly Republicans are in the files?

You only want Republicans on the list, Tom.

Because in your pea sized brain, the party you claim to not support (doubtful), and that is run by a bunch of morons (which it is) can do no wrong.

(10-27-2026 09:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:09 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:29 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Let’s release the entire unredacted file(s) and let the lawsuits, arrests, and trials begin, regardless of who is implicated.

I'm game. And if Trump actually is implicated in them as a sexual abuser of teenagers (he won't be), then may he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like everyone else in there.

I agree 100%. However, when it comes to the Epstein files, there's only ONE party, not Repubs and Dems. Anyone saying otherwise, particularly the Dems in this case, are simply playing partisan politics. As we've seen here, people are dumb enough to believe it.

What dem is saying only or mostly Republicans are in the files?

Well, there's a reason they are hell bent NOW with releasing the files but lacked any of that fervor during the last administration. And no, none of that, "they couldn't legal release anything" BS as we ALL know that's a lie. Leaks happen all the time. Pretty easy to read between the lines when it comes to the Dem timing in all this.

(10-27-2026 09:26 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:09 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:29 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Let’s release the entire unredacted file(s) and let the lawsuits, arrests, and trials begin, regardless of who is implicated.

I'm game. And if Trump actually is implicated in them as a sexual abuser of teenagers (he won't be), then may he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like everyone else in there.

I agree 100%. However, when it comes to the Epstein files, there's only ONE party, not Repubs and Dems. Anyone saying otherwise, particularly the Dems in this case, are simply playing partisan politics. As we've seen here, people are dumb enough to believe it.

What dem is saying only or mostly Republicans are in the files?

Well, there's a reason they are hell bent NOW with releasing the files but lacked any of that fervor during the last administration. And no, none of that, "they couldn't legal release anything" BS as we ALL know that's a lie. Leaks happen all the time. Pretty easy to read between the lines when it comes to the Dem timing in all this.

A leak isn't a release, dude. During pretty much all of Biden, this was still an active investigation.

And again, let's just have a credible investigation. All anyone is rally asking.

(10-26-2026 02:28 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I agree with Tom that all men involved in any Epstein-related crimes — and regardless of politics — need to be punished harshly. It will never happen, unfortunately.

Rich, powerful men typically can get away with ... well, literally murder.

If the Biden administration thought these were anything other than ridiculous lies, they would have pursued them. It takes somebody really stupid to keep talking about this. Democratic politicians know many of their voters are incredibly stupid. Anybody who posts this stuff just looks unbelievably stupid and gullible.

And really, you would think the Democrats could come up with better lies. If Trump was accused of raping a supermodel, people might listen, but teenage girls?

And Trump was the one who kicked Epstein out of his club. He was the only of the rich and powerful who offered to help the victims according to their lawyer. And he called the police when Epstein was arrested and told them they should look at Ghislaine Maxwell.

How much lack of self respect does someone have to have to keep looking like such an idiot? There are plenty of things to criticize Trump about, but this is not one of them.

(10-27-2026 09:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:26 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:09 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 08:29 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'm game. And if Trump actually is implicated in them as a sexual abuser of teenagers (he won't be), then may he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like everyone else in there.

I agree 100%. However, when it comes to the Epstein files, there's only ONE party, not Repubs and Dems. Anyone saying otherwise, particularly the Dems in this case, are simply playing partisan politics. As we've seen here, people are dumb enough to believe it.

What dem is saying only or mostly Republicans are in the files?

Well, there's a reason they are hell bent NOW with releasing the files but lacked any of that fervor during the last administration. And no, none of that, "they couldn't legal release anything" BS as we ALL know that's a lie. Leaks happen all the time. Pretty easy to read between the lines when it comes to the Dem timing in all this.

A leak isn't a release, dude. During pretty much all of Biden, this was still an active investigation.

And again, let's just have a credible investigation. All anyone is rally asking.

Point still stands. Again, there will be no "credible investigation" because BOTH parties and their donors would get burnt. Again, there is only ONE united party when it comes to anything Epstein related. Regarding Biden, it's still an active investigation now, so that excuse holds no water.

(10-27-2026 10:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:26 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:09 AM)VA49er Wrote:  I agree 100%. However, when it comes to the Epstein files, there's only ONE party, not Repubs and Dems. Anyone saying otherwise, particularly the Dems in this case, are simply playing partisan politics. As we've seen here, people are dumb enough to believe it.

What dem is saying only or mostly Republicans are in the files?

Well, there's a reason they are hell bent NOW with releasing the files but lacked any of that fervor during the last administration. And no, none of that, "they couldn't legal release anything" BS as we ALL know that's a lie. Leaks happen all the time. Pretty easy to read between the lines when it comes to the Dem timing in all this.

A leak isn't a release, dude. During pretty much all of Biden, this was still an active investigation.

And again, let's just have a credible investigation. All anyone is rally asking.

Point still stands. Again, there will be no "credible investigation" because BOTH parties and their donors would get burnt. Again, there is only ONE united party when it comes to anything Epstein related. Regarding Biden, it's still an active investigation now, so that excuse holds no water.

Except that it does because Garland was a choir boy...not the shill that trump has in place.

Garland

Partisan hack

"I went and read part of that report. It used the word "may", all this is, is more smoke & mirrors. That's all the dem's have." RBD

They always use words like perhaps, may, sources (but never by name) maybe, etc. because they know STUPID people (some post here) will believe it as truth. It's all a propaganda tool.

(10-27-2026 10:51 AM)olliebaba Wrote:  "I went and read part of that report. It used the word "may", all this is, is more smoke & mirrors. That's all the dem's have." RBD

They always use words like perhaps, may, sources (but never by name) maybe, etc. because they know STUPID people (some post here) will believe it as truth. It's all a propaganda tool.

Right, has nothing to do with the fact that legally they don't actually know for a certainty so they can't make a factual claim...which is why they want an actual investigation instead of stonewalling.

I realize that's a switch from what you're used to where your pals just say things like kids go to school as Jim and come home as Jane.

Chances are good that Epstein investigations will become a higher priority in Congress after November 3.



....
The House Judiciary Committee’s report Monday details allegations from 11 women that suggest Trump had some degree of involvement with Epstein’s alleged abuse, including five women who directly accuse Trump of assaulting them in the 1980s and 1990s. (Only one of those five allegations had not previously been made public, journalist Julie K. Brown noted Monday.)
....

What Will Democrats Do On Epstein If They Win The House?

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., told Bloomberg the “Epstein investigation is going to be one of our top priorities” if his party retakes the House, as Garcia stands poised to chair the House Oversight Committee. .... The committee would hold public hearings on Epstein, rather than only ones that take place behind closed doors. “The country wants disclosure, they want release of the files and they want justice for the survivors,” Garcia told Bloomberg, suggesting a Democratic-controlled committee could subpoena Attorney General Todd Blanche to testify about the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files.

Epstein’s ties to Wall Street are also expected to be a big focus of any congressional hearings under a Democratic House, with Garcia telling Bloomberg that banks that did business with Epstein would likely be called to testify. The House Judiciary Committee would also likely intensify its ongoing Epstein probes should they gain control.
....

What About The Senate?

Senate Democrats have also been carrying out their own investigations into Epstein, which could similarly ramp up if Democrats gain control of that chamber.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., has long been investigating Epstein’s finances and links to Wall Street, for instance, and the New York Times reports committees in both the House and Senate are prepared to hold hearings on Epstein’s financial affairs should they switch to Democratic control. Polling suggests that the Senate isn’t out of reach for Democrats in the midterms but Republicans also have a solid chance of maintaining control, however...

What Epstein-Related Legislation Could Pass?

If Democrats retake the House and Senate—or at least gets some sympathetic Senate Republicans on board—the party gets even more options to take action by bringing Epstein-related bills up for a vote.

Garcia and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., introduced legislation earlier in October that would force financial regulators to investigate banks that worked with Epstein and make all their records related to the late financier public, which would likely need a Democratic majority in Congress to pass. If it does, it could lead to Wall Street executives who worked with Epstein facing criminal investigations or charges, if they’re found to have enabled his alleged abuse.

Democrats and several Republicans have also backed the Epstein Files Transparency Act Part II, which would give state attorneys general and Epstein victims the right to sue the federal government for improperly withholding, concealing or redacting Epstein documents, and give lawmakers the right to challenge any Epstein-related documents the government is withholding.
....
Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., has also introduced a bill that would allow victims of sexual abuse to speak out even in cases where they’ve signed a non-disclosure agreement, potentially allowing more Epstein victims to identify associates who aided in his abuse.
....

Full Forbes report
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurke...-midterms/

(10-26-2026 05:30 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-26-2026 04:11 PM)Claw Wrote:  Why is there an overwhelming assumption that things in the Epstien files are true?

How do we know they haven't been altered? Or were blackmail lies from the beginning?

Where are these women now? Why didn't they come forward two elections ago?

The whole thing smells. ALL OF IT.

I wouldn't be surprised if lots of these accusations are complete B.S.

And I wouldn't be surprised if the bulk of the claims are true.

I'm open to either scenario.

That's exactly what drives so many people in this forum crazy, Billy.

Each person should have that in his repertoire, but not every single time. Some things discussed here should be long held beliefs, one way or the other.

(10-27-2026 10:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 10:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:26 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-27-2026 09:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  What dem is saying only or mostly Republicans are in the files?

Well, there's a reason they are hell bent NOW with releasing the files but lacked any of that fervor during the last administration. And no, none of that, "they couldn't legal release anything" BS as we ALL know that's a lie. Leaks happen all the time. Pretty easy to read between the lines when it comes to the Dem timing in all this.

A leak isn't a release, dude. During pretty much all of Biden, this was still an active investigation.

And again, let's just have a credible investigation. All anyone is rally asking.

Point still stands. Again, there will be no "credible investigation" because BOTH parties and their donors would get burnt. Again, there is only ONE united party when it comes to anything Epstein related. Regarding Biden, it's still an active investigation now, so that excuse holds no water.

Except that it does because Garland was a choir boy...not the shill that trump has in place.

Biden had no shills in place? To think not is laughable. Anyway, this goes back even before the Biden admin, back to the Clinton admin. No way they didn't know about it and did nothing.