(09-19-2013 12:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  A law partner of Hillary's in Little Rock once told me that the word around the firm was that the Clintons' idea of marital fidelity is that they didn't both chase the same woman at the same time.

Bill was quoted by someone long ago saying ... "Hillary had more beautiful women than I did when we were in college".

She had some thesis paper never publicly exposed. It was probably about her political feelings as a bi/lesbian.

(09-19-2013 03:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:01 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Meanwhile, there's Hillary.

Thrown off the House Watergate team.
Sleazy lawyer.
Sexual predator enabler.
Invisible senator.
Incompetent secretary of state.

AND she's homely.

So, let's make her president.

Keep it up! Moderates and Independents don't believe you. And you'll just p-ss off women voters with that line of attack.

Who you got to run against her? Lemme guess, some crazy Canadian homophobe ideologue (Ted Cruz) who'll poll less than Obama among Hispanics while speaking Spanish or a lunatic who wants our government to turn back to the 1890's (Rand Paul)

What should I wear to the Arkansas Ball in January 2017? Decisions, Decisions.

I figure you'll wear a skirt

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

(09-19-2013 03:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:01 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Meanwhile, there's Hillary.

Thrown off the House Watergate team.
Sleazy lawyer.
Sexual predator enabler.
Invisible senator.
Incompetent secretary of state.

AND she's homely.

So, let's make her president.

Keep it up! Moderates and Independents don't believe you. And you'll just p-ss off women voters with that line of attack.

What's funny is that calling Hillary "homely" may anger left-leaning women and would be considered chauvanist/sexist, but calling Palin every name in the book (including the c-word) would probably pass muster.

Besides, JFK loses a healthy chunk of his female votes if he looked like Newman from Seinfeld.

(09-19-2013 03:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  or a lunatic who wants our government to turn back to the 1890's (Rand Paul)

Hm, I would need to know our federal deficit/surplus status and involvement in foreign conflicts during the 1890s before I mock the idea of "turning back" some specific things to that long-ago decade.

But one thing we can all agree on is that Detroit was more bustling, more prosperous and with less crime in 1899 than it is now...

(09-19-2013 04:10 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  A law partner of Hillary's in Little Rock once told me that the word around the firm was that the Clintons' idea of marital fidelity is that they didn't both chase the same woman at the same time.

Bill was quoted by someone long ago saying ... "Both Hillary and I had some beautiful women when we were in college".

She had some thesis paper never publicly exposed. It was probably about her political feelings as a bi/lesbian.

Oh then, that solves it.

Did you seriously even read what you just wrote? You sound like a complete lunatic!

You don't have a source, you don't have an actual quote and you don't have a hidden thesis paper and you don't know what was in it even if you did find it. That about cover it? Geez, how sad you are.

(09-19-2013 04:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:10 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  A law partner of Hillary's in Little Rock once told me that the word around the firm was that the Clintons' idea of marital fidelity is that they didn't both chase the same woman at the same time.

Bill was quoted by someone long ago saying ... "Both Hillary and I had some beautiful women when we were in college".

She had some thesis paper never publicly exposed. It was probably about her political feelings as a bi/lesbian.

Oh then, that solves it.

Did you seriously even read what you just wrote? You sound like a complete lunatic!

You don't have a source, you don't have an actual quote and you don't have a hidden thesis paper and you don't know what was in it even if you did find it. That about cover it? Geez, how sad you are.

Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

They are protecting their queen. The LBGT brotherhood/sisterhood/otherhood unite!

Let's not forget, Hilary was a bit of a looker in the good ol' days. I don't know about you, but her sexuality increases the chances for the much sought after threeway. In the words of Judge Mills Lane.

(09-19-2013 04:01 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:27 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are you blind? She's hot.

And on another note, who the **** cares you misogynist bastard?

Hillary Clinton is hot like a fresh dog turd.

+1. (A steaming one on a cold winter morning)

I wonder what Vince Foster knew about Hillary?

(09-19-2013 03:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:01 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Meanwhile, there's Hillary.

Thrown off the House Watergate team.
Sleazy lawyer.
Sexual predator enabler.
Invisible senator.
Incompetent secretary of state.

AND she's homely.

So, let's make her president.

Keep it up! Moderates and Independents don't believe you. And you'll just p-ss off women voters with that line of attack.

Who you got to run against her? Lemme guess, some crazy Canadian homophobe ideologue (Ted Cruz) who'll poll less than Obama among Hispanics while speaking Spanish or a lunatic who wants our government to turn back to the 1890's (Rand Paul)

What should I wear to the Arkansas Ball in January 2017? Decisions, Decisions.

You have no idea what you are talking about Tom when it comes to Hillary and the opinions of women. My wife has said many times..."If she had thrown his clothes out of the windows of White House ..I would respect her...I have no use for weak ass women that allow men to schit all over them and do nothing". I have heard similar comments repeatedly over the years. From what I have observed...Women in general cant stand her. They might go along... but they cant stand her.

You assume that the GOP will have to beat Hillary. There is where you make your mistake. She wont even win her parties nomination.

(09-19-2013 05:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Let's not forget, Hilary was a bit of a looker in the good ol' days. I don't know about you, but her sexuality increases the chances for the much sought after threeway. In the words of Judge Mills Lane.

Yeah, about that...

(09-19-2013 06:25 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Let's not forget, Hilary was a bit of a looker in the good ol' days. I don't know about you, but her sexuality increases the chances for the much sought after threeway. In the words of Judge Mills Lane.

Yeah, about that...

I've seen some pretty good ones.

(09-19-2013 03:23 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:14 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 03:01 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Meanwhile, there's Hillary.

Thrown off the House Watergate team.
Sleazy lawyer.
Sexual predator enabler.
Invisible senator.
Incompetent secretary of state.

AND she's homely.

So, let's make her president.

Keep it up! Moderates and Independents don't believe you. And you'll just p-ss off unattractive and LGBTQERTYHGV women voters with that line of attack.

Who you got to run against her? Lemme guess, some crazy Canadian homophobe ideologue (Ted Cruz) who'll poll less than Obama among Hispanics while speaking Spanish or a lunatic who wants our government to turn back to the 1890's (Rand Paul)

What should I wear to the Arkansas Ball in January 2017? Decisions, Decisions.

FIFY

Spoken like a true Republican. Any more insults thrown at a majority of American women (who voted for Democrats)? I'm sure you have more. Keep it up, I'm wondering if you guys can lose Texas to HRC in 2016.

The reason the gender gap is so big (and increasing) is that women don't think the GOP respects them. I can't imagine where they would get that impression from....Just can't imagine.

I agree the GOP has plenty of problems attracting women. In fact...They suck at it.

You need to stop though trying to trot out Hillary Clinton as a woman that women support. That is blatant nonsense. Her record of running for the nomination of her own party speaks for itself. If she was such hot schit?...We would not have Obama in the WH.

(09-19-2013 06:14 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  I wonder what Vince Foster knew about Hillary?

Did he have a hot wife?

(09-19-2013 06:27 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 06:25 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Let's not forget, Hilary was a bit of a looker in the good ol' days. I don't know about you, but her sexuality increases the chances for the much sought after threeway. In the words of Judge Mills Lane.

Yeah, about that...

I've seen some pretty good ones.

She was attractive in her youth. The wall hit her pretty fast.

Race trumps gender, bye, bye Hillary. She is covered in blood,and no advertizing firm is going to cover that up.

How did a nice, smart, Republican girl from the suburbs of Chicago go so terribly wrong?

(09-19-2013 06:42 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Race trumps gender, bye, bye Hillary. She is covered in blood,and no advertizing firm is going to cover that up.

I disagree.

I think the left is so invested in her you could have her on youtube blowing Assad while smoking a doob rolled in the Constitution and they'd still call you a hater for pointing it out.

(09-19-2013 06:48 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 06:42 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Race trumps gender, bye, bye Hillary. She is covered in blood,and no advertizing firm is going to cover that up.

I disagree.

I think the left is so invested in her you could have her on youtube blowing Assad while smoking a doob rolled in the Constitution and they'd still call you a hater for pointing it out.

Given ANY decent alternative...the Democrats will not allow her to represent their gang. We already saw that. The same thing will happen again. It would not surprise me that it is a woman that Fcks her this time...no pun intended.

(09-19-2013 06:48 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 06:42 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Race trumps gender, bye, bye Hillary. She is covered in blood,and no advertizing firm is going to cover that up.

I disagree.

I think the left is so invested in her you could have her on youtube blowing Assad while smoking a doob rolled in the Constitution and they'd still call you a hater for pointing it out.

I see people like Tom asking for a link, asking for context or all the facts to come out then blame Republicans.

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016