(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:16 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:10 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  A law partner of Hillary's in Little Rock once told me that the word around the firm was that the Clintons' idea of marital fidelity is that they didn't both chase the same woman at the same time.

Bill was quoted by someone long ago saying ... "Both Hillary and I had some beautiful women when we were in college".

She had some thesis paper never publicly exposed. It was probably about her political feelings as a bi/lesbian.

Oh then, that solves it.

Did you seriously even read what you just wrote? You sound like a complete lunatic!

You don't have a source, you don't have an actual quote and you don't have a hidden thesis paper and you don't know what was in it even if you did find it. That about cover it? Geez, how sad you are.

Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

(09-19-2013 10:26 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 10:03 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 09:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 06:14 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  I wonder what Vince Foster knew about Hillary?

^
Look up to see why no one was interested in impeaching Bill Clinton. Because a#ssclowns put out conspiracy nonsense such as "Hillary murdered Vince Foster, etc.".

Feel free to bring that up some more. It doesn't help your credibility or your cause.

There were credible assertions that Foster & Hillary had something going on while in Little Rock.

I never implied that Hillary killed Foster.

More like Hillary boinked Foster when she wasn't wearing Mr. Strappy.

Now she's straight again?

"BI"sexual. Dense is dense.

Let's assume for a moment that she gets elected.

Then what?

What in her history screams "leadership material"?

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Her girlfriends?

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:16 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:10 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Bill was quoted by someone long ago saying ... "Both Hillary and I had some beautiful women when we were in college".

She had some thesis paper never publicly exposed. It was probably about her political feelings as a bi/lesbian.

Oh then, that solves it.

Did you seriously even read what you just wrote? You sound like a complete lunatic!

You don't have a source, you don't have an actual quote and you don't have a hidden thesis paper and you don't know what was in it even if you did find it. That about cover it? Geez, how sad you are.

Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:16 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Oh then, that solves it.

Did you seriously even read what you just wrote? You sound like a complete lunatic!

You don't have a source, you don't have an actual quote and you don't have a hidden thesis paper and you don't know what was in it even if you did find it. That about cover it? Geez, how sad you are.

Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

There was an interview with someone very close to Bill Clinton. This was several years ago. The interviewee (whose name I forget) said that Bill once told him that Hillary had as many (or more) good-looking women as Bill did in college. It seemed credible and not made up.

Is it true about Hillary? I have no idea, but the interview did happen. Buyer beware ... take it with a grain of salt ... I can't substantiate it.

That's all I have to say.

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:16 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 04:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Oh then, that solves it.

Did you seriously even read what you just wrote? You sound like a complete lunatic!

You don't have a source, you don't have an actual quote and you don't have a hidden thesis paper and you don't know what was in it even if you did find it. That about cover it? Geez, how sad you are.

Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

Come on bro, lighten up. He told a story, he didn't report is as news on a national TV show and say, ummm, errrr, well, Bush lied about his military career or anything like that or that a presidential candidate hasn't paid any taxes in 10 years. The standards on this board are higher than the standards of many left wing media propaganda outlets and their masters.

(09-20-2013 01:47 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:16 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

Come on bro, lighten up. He told a story, he didn't report is as news on a national TV show and say, ummm, errrr, well, Bush lied about his military career or anything like that or that a presidential candidate hasn't paid any taxes in 10 years. The standards on this board are higher than the standards of many left wing media propaganda outlets and their masters.

Sorry, but no. Your side would not let me get away with something like this and you know it.

(09-20-2013 01:32 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 05:16 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Yes, I'll admit it's hearsay. I saw it on TV about 8 or 10 years ago. I'm sorry I didn't write down the exact quote and the name of the person that said it. I didn't know that I would be tested on it in 2013.

What's the big deal? So what if she's bi or a lesbian? I'm a conservative and I don't care. I would think that libs wouldn't care either. Why are your panties in a twist over whether Hillary is gay?

That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

There was an interview with someone very close to Bill Clinton. This was several years ago. The interviewee (whose name I forget) said that Bill once told him that Hillary had as many (or more) good-looking women as Bill did in college. It seemed credible and not made up.

Is it true about Hillary? I have no idea, but the interview did happen. Buyer beware ... take it with a grain of salt ... I can't substantiate it.

That's all I have to say.

Seems like you should be able to find something online about this...if there was actually an interview regarding a future/former president containing such a "bombshell".

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Let's assume for a moment that she gets elected.

Then what?

What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Anyone? Beuller?

(09-19-2013 10:26 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 10:03 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 09:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 06:14 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  I wonder what Vince Foster knew about Hillary?

^
Look up to see why no one was interested in impeaching Bill Clinton. Because a#ssclowns put out conspiracy nonsense such as "Hillary murdered Vince Foster, etc.".

Feel free to bring that up some more. It doesn't help your credibility or your cause.

There were credible assertions that Foster & Hillary had something going on while in Little Rock.

I never implied that Hillary killed Foster.

More like Hillary boinked Foster when she wasn't wearing Mr. Strappy.

Now she's straight again?

Know what "bi" means?

(09-20-2013 02:44 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Let's assume for a moment that she gets elected.

Then what?

What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Anyone? Beuller?

Let's assume Ted Cruz gets elected...or Rand Paul...or Paul Ryan...or Sarah Palin. What in their history screams leadership material?

Look, we don't have a test to become President. It's a pointless exercise to go down that road as nobody is going to convince you otherwise about her.

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Her girlfriends?

(09-20-2013 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:44 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Let's assume for a moment that she gets elected.

Then what?

What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Anyone? Beuller?

Let's assume Ted Cruz gets elected...or Rand Paul...or Paul Ryan...or Sarah Palin. What in their history screams leadership material?

Look, we don't have a test to become President. It's a pointless exercise to go down that road as nobody is going to convince you otherwise about her.

Eye on the ball, Tom. We're talking about Hillary.

I realize there's no test. All we have is the history of the candidate to go on. Now, start your answer over.

(09-20-2013 02:48 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:44 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Let's assume for a moment that she gets elected.

Then what?

What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Anyone? Beuller?

Let's assume Ted Cruz gets elected...or Rand Paul...or Paul Ryan...or Sarah Palin. What in their history screams leadership material?

Look, we don't have a test to become President. It's a pointless exercise to go down that road as nobody is going to convince you otherwise about her.

Eye on the ball, Tom. We're talking about Hillary.

I realize there's no test. All we have is the history of the candidate to go on. Now, start your answer over.

If you realize there's no test, then why do you keep giving one. As I said, it's a pointless exercise.

(09-20-2013 02:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:48 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:44 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 12:50 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Let's assume for a moment that she gets elected.

Then what?

What in her history screams "leadership material"?

Anyone? Beuller?

Let's assume Ted Cruz gets elected...or Rand Paul...or Paul Ryan...or Sarah Palin. What in their history screams leadership material?

Look, we don't have a test to become President. It's a pointless exercise to go down that road as nobody is going to convince you otherwise about her.

Eye on the ball, Tom. We're talking about Hillary.

I realize there's no test. All we have is the history of the candidate to go on. Now, start your answer over.

If you realize there's no test, then why do you keep giving one. As I said, it's a pointless exercise.

Yeah, I can't think of anything, either.

(09-20-2013 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 01:32 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  That's not the issue. It's your post with nothing but made up bull**** and zero basis in any sort of fact. That's not usually your territory. At least I thought.

Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

There was an interview with someone very close to Bill Clinton. This was several years ago. The interviewee (whose name I forget) said that Bill once told him that Hillary had as many (or more) good-looking women as Bill did in college. It seemed credible and not made up.

Is it true about Hillary? I have no idea, but the interview did happen. Buyer beware ... take it with a grain of salt ... I can't substantiate it.

That's all I have to say.

Seems like you should be able to find something online about this...if there was actually an interview regarding a future/former president containing such a "bombshell".

Why would someone else's story be more credible than his? And he is, indeed, online.

(09-20-2013 03:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 02:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 01:32 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-20-2013 11:17 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Well, I didn't make it up. I never make things up.

I can't write a bibliography on every personal experience I've ever had.

That's your standard for posting something here? You don't give two ***** that it's unsubstantiated gossip? Instead you run with it anyway?

And yes, the story told you was made-up bull****. I didn't say you made it up that someone told you this complete fabrication.

But maybe you can redeem yourself by admitting that it's made-up bull****.

There was an interview with someone very close to Bill Clinton. This was several years ago. The interviewee (whose name I forget) said that Bill once told him that Hillary had as many (or more) good-looking women as Bill did in college. It seemed credible and not made up.

Is it true about Hillary? I have no idea, but the interview did happen. Buyer beware ... take it with a grain of salt ... I can't substantiate it.

That's all I have to say.

Seems like you should be able to find something online about this...if there was actually an interview regarding a future/former president containing such a "bombshell".

Why would someone else's story be more credible than his? And he is, indeed, online.

Because it could either be Billy Graham or Orly Taitz. Not only would we have an actual name, but we could also determine their credibility, or lack thereof. See?

Like your lack of credibility Tom?

Frankly, I don't give a rip about her sexuality at all. I just read this thread for laughs.

(09-20-2013 03:41 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Like your lack of credibility Tom?

Frankly, I don't give a rip about her sexuality at all. I just read this thread for laughs.

I don't either MHB, but I'm not posting that I heard that former president Bush's wife Laura was a coke dealer in college.