Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)
Open TigerLinks
 

Post Reply 
Rebounding
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
tigergg Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,083
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 166
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: Millington
Post: #41
RE: Rebounding
(03-31-2013 07:44 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  
(03-31-2013 02:40 PM)tigergg Wrote:  
(03-31-2013 12:41 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  Marquette outrebounding Cuse really helped them in their Elite Eight game.
I recall a couple of times Marquette missing like 5 or 6 shots in the same possession..they couldn't throw it in the ocean if they were in a boat last night..

but the OP was
(03-30-2013 03:43 PM)tigergg Wrote:  Rebounding can definitely make or break a team..
like I said Marquette outrebounded Cuse butdidn't win. Now you're saying rebounding didn't make or break a team, instead their shooting or lack of it did?
I did say "can" and in Marquettes case they are an exception because they are a very poor shooting team that rebounds as good as anyone..They are the type of team that will miss 2 or 3 shots on a possession but score after there 2nd of 3rd rebound..As poor of a shooting team as they are they won a lot of games because of there rebounding just not the Cuse game..
03-31-2013 10:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CUSA_NEWS Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,925
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 183
I Root For: Memphis Ligers
Location: MS River Mile 411
Post: #42
RE: Rebounding
About that cherry picking,

How many fouls would Black have if he played 40mins?? Hey look, I deal with imaginary numbers (i) in my field of work however I dont think this works in bball. 05-nono

Besides, if Black was performing as he should coach would want him on the floor as much as possible, correct???
03-shhhh

(03-31-2013 01:02 AM)Blackman Wrote:  Like usual you cherry pick stats to fit your narrative.If you measure individuals you have to account for minutes played to get a true picture.
Both Shaq and Tarik average 9 boards on a per 40 minute basis...not great but not the horrible oafs you are attempting to make them out to be.
For perspective:
Stokes is 13 per 40
Deng for Louisville is 12 per 40
Noel for Kentucky was 12 per 40.
03-31-2013 10:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CUSA_NEWS Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,925
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 183
I Root For: Memphis Ligers
Location: MS River Mile 411
Post: #43
RE: Rebounding
About the comment of me not posting during the 29-2 strecth, you're correct. You may not have seen my post, but right before conf play I stated on here I would not be posting much until the end of the season as I, like others, knew we would romp cusa like usual and that everyones stats would look good during that period (for ex. Adonis)...

I also stated I would revisit this site during the REAL stretch... the NC two A tournament.... and as I suspected, we can win 19 straight in conf but cant win 3 straight against decent opponents OOC.... not even two as it turns out.
03-31-2013 10:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CUSA_NEWS Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,925
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 183
I Root For: Memphis Ligers
Location: MS River Mile 411
Post: #44
RE: Rebounding
BTW Blackman,

Stokes could actually play a full NBA game plus TWO full OT and another THREE MINS before tallying five fouls.... no imaginary extrapolation needed for Mr Stokes.

But I digress.

Hope everyone had a wonderful Easter.
03-31-2013 11:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Offline
Knower of all known knowings
*

Posts: 10,070
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 402
I Root For: Master Yoda
Location: Jedi Temple
Post: #45
RE: Rebounding
No wonder no one likes this guy.
03-31-2013 11:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OneShiningMoment Away
MT.org's Smartass and Dumbass
*

Posts: 22,110
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 701
I Root For: OnCampusStadium
Location: Universityof Memphis

Donators
Post: #46
RE: Rebounding
(03-31-2013 10:00 PM)tigergg Wrote:  
(03-31-2013 07:44 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  
(03-31-2013 02:40 PM)tigergg Wrote:  
(03-31-2013 12:41 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  Marquette outrebounding Cuse really helped them in their Elite Eight game.
I recall a couple of times Marquette missing like 5 or 6 shots in the same possession..they couldn't throw it in the ocean if they were in a boat last night..

but the OP was
(03-30-2013 03:43 PM)tigergg Wrote:  Rebounding can definitely make or break a team..
like I said Marquette outrebounded Cuse butdidn't win. Now you're saying rebounding didn't make or break a team, instead their shooting or lack of it did?
I did say "can" and in Marquettes case they are an exception because they are a very poor shooting team that rebounds as good as anyone..They are the type of team that will miss 2 or 3 shots on a possession but score after there 2nd of 3rd rebound..As poor of a shooting team as they are they won a lot of games because of there rebounding just not the Cuse game..

If you use "can" to mean possibly, why even write "definitely" after it which makes it contradictory.
03-31-2013 11:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BealeStreetTiger Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,088
Joined: Mar 2010
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Blues City
Post: #47
RE: Rebounding
As long as we play small we’ll never be a good rebounding team. Our guards get more rebounds because there are usually more of them on the floor plus Shaq & Black split minutes instead of playing together.

Wichita State’s bigs may be on the thin side but at least they play more than 1 at a time. They are long, athletic, and usually send 4 to the boards.
04-01-2013 12:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Offline
Knower of all known knowings
*

Posts: 10,070
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 402
I Root For: Master Yoda
Location: Jedi Temple
Post: #48
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 12:15 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  As long as we play small we’ll never be a good rebounding team. Our guards get more rebounds because there are usually more of them on the floor plus Shaq & Black split minutes instead of playing together.

Wichita State’s bigs may be on the thin side but at least they play more than 1 at a time. They are long, athletic, and usually send 4 to the boards.

We can't sh*t what we don't have. We only have 2 real bigs. One is a freshman and the other is a Jr who doesn't rebound well. We know you think if we just leave Black and Shaq on the floor all the time that we would be a totally different team, but most of us know that both are WAY foul prone and Black has been a serious liability on defense all year.
04-01-2013 12:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger USA Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,179
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 59
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #49
RE: Rebounding
(03-31-2013 10:59 PM)CUSA_NEWS Wrote:  About the comment of me not posting during the 29-2 strecth, you're correct. You may not have seen my post, but right before conf play I stated on here I would not be posting much until the end of the season as I, like others, knew we would romp cusa like usual and that everyones stats would look good during that period (for ex. Adonis)...

I also stated I would revisit this site during the REAL stretch... the NC two A tournament.... and as I suspected, we can win 19 straight in conf but cant win 3 straight against decent opponents OOC.... not even two as it turns out.

Ah, what selective memory.

You are quite prolific during/after the losses and close wins.
You disappear during the solid wins.
(This post was last modified: 04-01-2013 02:16 AM by Tiger USA.)
04-01-2013 01:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BealeStreetTiger Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,088
Joined: Mar 2010
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Blues City
Post: #50
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 12:27 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:15 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  As long as we play small we’ll never be a good rebounding team. Our guards get more rebounds because there are usually more of them on the floor plus Shaq & Black split minutes instead of playing together.

Wichita State’s bigs may be on the thin side but at least they play more than 1 at a time. They are long, athletic, and usually send 4 to the boards.

We can't sh*t what we don't have. We only have 2 real bigs. One is a freshman and the other is a Jr who doesn't rebound well. We know you think if we just leave Black and Shaq on the floor all the time that we would be a totally different team, but most of us know that both are WAY foul prone and Black has been a serious liability on defense all year.

Well we’ll just have to disagree. I’d rather they foul out than to allow teams to take advantage of us not playing our best real bigs. I’ve seen many teams play decent paint games with players no better than Hall or Stan. I can’t see either being any worse rebounding and who knows, they may be better. Hall gave decent minutes last year and started at the beginning of this season. Now all of a sudden he only gets a minute or two or nothing at all?

For 3 years now I’ve been pointing out our biggest problem is the frontcourt. I gave Niles & Coleman a pass. While many are now saying (like in the past) that we’ll be fine, I say maybe, maybe not. Our recruits are fine but IMO we still need another true big.
04-01-2013 02:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Offline
Knower of all known knowings
*

Posts: 10,070
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 402
I Root For: Master Yoda
Location: Jedi Temple
Post: #51
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 02:56 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:27 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:15 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  As long as we play small we’ll never be a good rebounding team. Our guards get more rebounds because there are usually more of them on the floor plus Shaq & Black split minutes instead of playing together.

Wichita State’s bigs may be on the thin side but at least they play more than 1 at a time. They are long, athletic, and usually send 4 to the boards.

We can't sh*t what we don't have. We only have 2 real bigs. One is a freshman and the other is a Jr who doesn't rebound well. We know you think if we just leave Black and Shaq on the floor all the time that we would be a totally different team, but most of us know that both are WAY foul prone and Black has been a serious liability on defense all year.

Well we’ll just have to disagree. I’d rather they foul out than to allow teams to take advantage of us not playing our best real bigs. I’ve seen many teams play decent paint games with players no better than Hall or Stan. I can’t see either being any worse rebounding and who knows, they may be better. Hall gave decent minutes last year and started at the beginning of this season. Now all of a sudden he only gets a minute or two or nothing at all?

For 3 years now I’ve been pointing out our biggest problem is the frontcourt. I gave Niles & Coleman a pass. Our recruits are fine but IMO we still need another true big.

Everyone has known for 3 years that we need more bigs. Nothing has changed and we still need another. This is not front page news or a new story, everyone has known this all along.

Your perspective is not as unique as you are thinking it is.

I think you are misunderstanding what other poster think about it.
04-01-2013 03:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BealeStreetTiger Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,088
Joined: Mar 2010
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Blues City
Post: #52
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 03:02 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 02:56 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:27 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:15 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  As long as we play small we’ll never be a good rebounding team. Our guards get more rebounds because there are usually more of them on the floor plus Shaq & Black split minutes instead of playing together.

Wichita State’s bigs may be on the thin side but at least they play more than 1 at a time. They are long, athletic, and usually send 4 to the boards.

We can't sh*t what we don't have. We only have 2 real bigs. One is a freshman and the other is a Jr who doesn't rebound well. We know you think if we just leave Black and Shaq on the floor all the time that we would be a totally different team, but most of us know that both are WAY foul prone and Black has been a serious liability on defense all year.

Well we’ll just have to disagree. I’d rather they foul out than to allow teams to take advantage of us not playing our best real bigs. I’ve seen many teams play decent paint games with players no better than Hall or Stan. I can’t see either being any worse rebounding and who knows, they may be better. Hall gave decent minutes last year and started at the beginning of this season. Now all of a sudden he only gets a minute or two or nothing at all?

For 3 years now I’ve been pointing out our biggest problem is the frontcourt. I gave Niles & Coleman a pass. Our recruits are fine but IMO we still need another true big.

Everyone has known for 3 years that we need more bigs. Nothing has changed and we still need another. This is not front page news or a new story, everyone has known this all along.

Your perspective is not as unique as you are thinking it is.

I think you are misunderstanding what other poster think about it.

I’m not misunderstanding what was typed in black & white. I also know there are some here who agree with my perspective on the subject.

After we missed on all our real bigs other than Shaq there were posters here and elsewhere saying we’ll be fine. Some were even saying we didn’t need another big and should save a scholarship to avoid issues like with Stokes. There was even a thread posted here a few weeks ago titled Playing Small where some thinks we play much better with mainly guards and Shaq & Black on the bench.
http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=624045

There are many more threads on here where some have implied they like the smaller lineup much better and most were during our run in CUSA. The only reason for the change by some now is they just saw what happens when you use a small frontcourt against a good big one.
04-01-2013 03:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BuccTiger Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,421
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 58
I Root For: Memphis / ETSU
Location:
Post: #53
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 03:56 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 03:02 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 02:56 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:27 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:15 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  As long as we play small we’ll never be a good rebounding team. Our guards get more rebounds because there are usually more of them on the floor plus Shaq & Black split minutes instead of playing together.

Wichita State’s bigs may be on the thin side but at least they play more than 1 at a time. They are long, athletic, and usually send 4 to the boards.

We can't sh*t what we don't have. We only have 2 real bigs. One is a freshman and the other is a Jr who doesn't rebound well. We know you think if we just leave Black and Shaq on the floor all the time that we would be a totally different team, but most of us know that both are WAY foul prone and Black has been a serious liability on defense all year.

Well we’ll just have to disagree. I’d rather they foul out than to allow teams to take advantage of us not playing our best real bigs. I’ve seen many teams play decent paint games with players no better than Hall or Stan. I can’t see either being any worse rebounding and who knows, they may be better. Hall gave decent minutes last year and started at the beginning of this season. Now all of a sudden he only gets a minute or two or nothing at all?

For 3 years now I’ve been pointing out our biggest problem is the frontcourt. I gave Niles & Coleman a pass. Our recruits are fine but IMO we still need another true big.

Everyone has known for 3 years that we need more bigs. Nothing has changed and we still need another. This is not front page news or a new story, everyone has known this all along.

Your perspective is not as unique as you are thinking it is.

I think you are misunderstanding what other poster think about it.

I’m not misunderstanding what was typed in black & white. I also know there are some here who agree with my perspective on the subject.

After we missed on all our real bigs other than Shaq there were posters here and elsewhere saying we’ll be fine. Some were even saying we didn’t need another big and should save a scholarship to avoid issues like with Stokes. There was even a thread posted here a few weeks ago titled Playing Small where some thinks we play much better with mainly guards and Shaq & Black on the bench.
http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=624045

There are many more threads on here where some have implied they like the smaller lineup much better and most were during our run in CUSA. The only reason for the change by some now is they just saw what happens when you use a small frontcourt against a good big one.

I agree with BealStreetTiger on almost everything he posts on this subject.

I would like to summarize a couple of posts I made months ago.

I made the case that in addition that playing more size in the post would help our rebounding, that our guards didn't know how to make a post pass into the low block. They consistently pull the post player off the block or throw the ball at the post players ankles. Black isn't mobile enough to regain position without losing the ball. The most consistent low post passer is Goodwin from the high post area. I know this is a tangent to what we have been discussing, but it is related. I think it would be a good exercise to have our guards post up and then throw the ball off the block, off course they are more agile so no lights would probably click on?

As it currently sits our team is set up where the sole post player is there to rebound and give the ball back to the guards so they can drive to the basket or throw up a three point shot. I think the guards are taking the easy road out that throwing up a lot of 3's but that is just me. A three attempt results in a long rebound that usually rebounds all the way out past our bigs.

We need a more rounded offense to get the big integrated into the flow and used to passing back out or to another big.

It looks like we are set up for another year of mostly a 4 out 1 in setup. Either Goodwin or Black (if we have him) at the sole post spot and Nichols at the roaming 4 spot. This is where we have been for a while even with Cal. It only really works when you have a Dorsey (who is content to rebound and only take dunks) along with an athletic 4 who can also hit from the outside.

The problem with this is sometimes the shots don't fall and you have to go inside, either by driving in (which it appears our guards are sometimes afraid to do) or feeding the post.

On rebounding you have to have at least two people who can block out, if you don't it just becomes are wrestling match for your lone post player with an opposing teams big with at least half the court open since they free of your lone post players' backside.
(This post was last modified: 04-01-2013 05:43 AM by BuccTiger.)
04-01-2013 05:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BealeStreetTiger Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,088
Joined: Mar 2010
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Blues City
Post: #54
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 05:39 AM)BuccTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 03:56 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 03:02 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 02:56 AM)BealeStreetTiger Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 12:27 AM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  We can't sh*t what we don't have. We only have 2 real bigs. One is a freshman and the other is a Jr who doesn't rebound well. We know you think if we just leave Black and Shaq on the floor all the time that we would be a totally different team, but most of us know that both are WAY foul prone and Black has been a serious liability on defense all year.

Well we’ll just have to disagree. I’d rather they foul out than to allow teams to take advantage of us not playing our best real bigs. I’ve seen many teams play decent paint games with players no better than Hall or Stan. I can’t see either being any worse rebounding and who knows, they may be better. Hall gave decent minutes last year and started at the beginning of this season. Now all of a sudden he only gets a minute or two or nothing at all?

For 3 years now I’ve been pointing out our biggest problem is the frontcourt. I gave Niles & Coleman a pass. Our recruits are fine but IMO we still need another true big.

Everyone has known for 3 years that we need more bigs. Nothing has changed and we still need another. This is not front page news or a new story, everyone has known this all along.

Your perspective is not as unique as you are thinking it is.

I think you are misunderstanding what other poster think about it.

I’m not misunderstanding what was typed in black & white. I also know there are some here who agree with my perspective on the subject.

After we missed on all our real bigs other than Shaq there were posters here and elsewhere saying we’ll be fine. Some were even saying we didn’t need another big and should save a scholarship to avoid issues like with Stokes. There was even a thread posted here a few weeks ago titled Playing Small where some thinks we play much better with mainly guards and Shaq & Black on the bench.
http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=624045

There are many more threads on here where some have implied they like the smaller lineup much better and most were during our run in CUSA. The only reason for the change by some now is they just saw what happens when you use a small frontcourt against a good big one.

I agree with BealStreetTiger on almost everything he posts on this subject.

I would like to summarize a couple of posts I made months ago.

I made the case that in addition that playing more size in the post would help our rebounding, that our guards didn't know how to make a post pass into the low block. They consistently pull the post player off the block or throw the ball at the post players ankles. Black isn't mobile enough to regain position without losing the ball. The most consistent low post passer is Goodwin from the high post area. I know this is a tangent to what we have been discussing, but it is related. I think it would be a good exercise to have our guards post up and then throw the ball off the block, off course they are more agile so no lights would probably click on?

As it currently sits our team is set up where the sole post player is there to rebound and give the ball back to the guards so they can drive to the basket or throw up a three point shot. I think the guards are taking the easy road out that throwing up a lot of 3's but that is just me. A three attempt results in a long rebound that usually rebounds all the way out past our bigs.

We need a more rounded offense to get the big integrated into the flow and used to passing back out or to another big.

It looks like we are set up for another year of mostly a 4 out 1 in setup. Either Goodwin or Black (if we have him) at the sole post spot and Nichols at the roaming 4 spot. This is where we have been for a while even with Cal. It only really works when you have a Dorsey (who is content to rebound and only take dunks) along with an athletic 4 who can also hit from the outside.

The problem with this is sometimes the shots don't fall and you have to go inside, either by driving in (which it appears our guards are sometimes afraid to do) or feeding the post.

On rebounding you have to have at least two people who can block out, if you don't it just becomes are wrestling match for your lone post player with an opposing teams big with at least half the court open since they free of your lone post players' backside.

Nice post and I agree with your points too.

I might add I saw only 1other team run the 4 out 1 in (IIRC North Carolina/Kanas?) in the tourney. They tried this set and later changed to a traditional lineup after realizing they were getting killed on the boards.

I also agree it appears we’ll run the same set next season.
04-01-2013 06:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mimi Offline
Who farted??
*

Posts: 29,067
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation: 754
I Root For: reasonableness
Location: Memphis mostly
Post: #55
RE: Rebounding
We were fine.

Our kids lost to MSU.

Can we get even better? Yes. Can the bigs rebounding improve? Yes.

Does that mean there will not be sub par outings? No.
(This post was last modified: 04-01-2013 07:26 AM by Mimi.)
04-01-2013 07:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
misplaced tiger Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,702
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 111
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #56
RE: Rebounding
I really hate the "we'll be fine" posts. What does that mean exactly? We'll have a winning record? We'll win our conference? We'll make the Final Four? We'll win enough games to keep pople coming to the games?
04-01-2013 08:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MemphisCanes Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,048
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 415
I Root For: THE Tigers
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post: #57
RE: Rebounding
Memphis' Offensive rebounding % was 50th in the nation. Better than Michigan's, but worse than Cuse, Louisville and Wichita State.

Memphis' Defensive rebounding % was 134th in the nation. Better than Louisville and Syracuse, worse than Wichita State and Michigan.

Memphis, statistically, as a team (if you average defensive and offensive rebounding ranking), was a better rebounding team than Michigan, Syracuse and Louisville.

So please, tell me how Memphis is a "poor rebounding team". If that's even true, it obviously doesn't matter all that much because 3 of 4 Final Four teams this season are worse.
04-01-2013 08:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
midtowncowboy Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,838
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 218
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
Post: #58
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 08:29 AM)MemphisCanes Wrote:  Memphis' Offensive rebounding % was 50th in the nation. Better than Michigan's, but worse than Cuse, Louisville and Wichita State.

Memphis' Defensive rebounding % was 134th in the nation. Better than Louisville and Syracuse, worse than Wichita State and Michigan.

Memphis, statistically, as a team (if you average defensive and offensive rebounding ranking), was a better rebounding team than Michigan, Syracuse and Louisville.

So please, tell me how Memphis is a "poor rebounding team". If that's even true, it obviously doesn't matter all that much because 3 of 4 Final Four teams this season are worse.

Memphis is a poor defensive rebounding team. Watch the games against good teams. Throw out the stats because they are padded. See Rice. And to claim 3 of the 4 Final Four teams are worse is comical. How did they do when it was time to play against good teams?
(This post was last modified: 04-01-2013 09:03 AM by midtowncowboy.)
04-01-2013 09:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MemphisCanes Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,048
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 415
I Root For: THE Tigers
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post: #59
RE: Rebounding
(04-01-2013 09:02 AM)midtowncowboy Wrote:  
(04-01-2013 08:29 AM)MemphisCanes Wrote:  Memphis' Offensive rebounding % was 50th in the nation. Better than Michigan's, but worse than Cuse, Louisville and Wichita State.

Memphis' Defensive rebounding % was 134th in the nation. Better than Louisville and Syracuse, worse than Wichita State and Michigan.

Memphis, statistically, as a team (if you average defensive and offensive rebounding ranking), was a better rebounding team than Michigan, Syracuse and Louisville.

So please, tell me how Memphis is a "poor rebounding team". If that's even true, it obviously doesn't matter all that much because 3 of 4 Final Four teams this season are worse.

Memphis is a poor defensive rebounding team. Watch the games against good teams. Throw out the stats because they are padded. See Rice. And to claim 3 of the 4 Final Four teams are worse is comical. How did they do when it was time to play against good teams?

I watched every game. Allowed UL to get 10 Offensive rebounds (we pulled down 13 offensive rebounds). Allowed Minny to grab 11 (we grabbed 17). Held VCU to 10 (we only grabbed 8). Allowed St. Mary's 15 (we grabbed 10). MSU grabbed 14 (we grabbed 11).

All of those games save the MSU game we kept Oreb% in the .300s. It doesn't put us up there in the elite teams, but it is far, far from poor.

For reference, how did Syracuse do against "good teams"? They just let Marquette have 19 offensive rebounds on Saturday.
04-01-2013 09:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mimi Offline
Who farted??
*

Posts: 29,067
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation: 754
I Root For: reasonableness
Location: Memphis mostly
Post: #60
RE: Rebounding
I posted that we were fine (overall).

We will be fine means...we will have a really good team that if it gets any breaks will be in position to make a run at a Final Four. As they were this season. While MSU dominated the boards, and while there is no question that is an area that our kids can improve in...the idea that there was some fatal flaw based on a few games- when in so many other games our kids outrebounded opponents or won the game...seems a bit dramatic.

Or- there can be more threads and posts presenting the fresh idea that if X team makes mistakes, it is harder to win.

Really.
04-01-2013 09:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
MemphisTigers.org is the number one message board for Memphis Tigers sports.