Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
What is it in minority culture .....
Author Message
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #121
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 11:40 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:34 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:27 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:22 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:19 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Which is pretty close to par for government agencies.

At least it is in government and not in the hands of a bunch of fake charities.

I would trust the Salvation Army and the Red Cross more with my money than any government agency.

That is REDISTRIBUTION first of all. Secondly, that is addiing a middle man. Finally, a ton of fake charities will then pop up and want a piece of the action, which would be worse than the supposed government give away that you are railing against.

Only a careless moron gives the fruits of their labor to "fake charities".

Charity is voluntary and altruistic....Government programs are financed at the point of a gun. Putting a gun to peoples heads just because you think something should be done about a problem is a violent, savage way to operate.

There are fake charities under investigation by the IRS and State governments right now. And careless morons are the ones who gave them money.
11-10-2012 12:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,356
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #122
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 11:58 AM)Claw Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:54 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-09-2012 10:26 PM)Claw Wrote:  
(11-09-2012 01:00 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  But your explanation of that is false, completely sh*t, and quasi-racist.

Yes, lump all Latinos into one category, despite the vastly different cultures and influences the native american cultures on south and central america had on them, both phenotypically and culturally. Sure, they're the same as Blacks, or close enough it doesn't matter. Nevermind the vast differences in societies between african cultures that different slaves were sold into, those aren't important. And Native american cultures still left in the US? Sure, they're all the same without any sort of significant differences between their cultures.

You're literally too stupid to argue with because I can't even of where I should begin to point out your blatant ignorance.

The reality is that there was no other contemporary culture remotely resembling the United States. People who came here to embrace that culture did so on purpose.

But, there are large segments who didn't come here for that reason, and they do not embrace the traditional American culture. They continue to be more influenced by the culture of the ancestors.

But, if you don't buy my explanation, then I'm sure you'll explain the real reason for the cultural differences we have today.

That's just it, there is no singular, simplistic reason for this. I know you want there to be, so that your miniscule little brain could wrap itself around it, but it's a complicated question with a very complicated answer. But I can assure you, hispanics didn't vote overwhemlingly democrat because some half-baked 'tribal culture', and neither did Blacks. But it is quite telling that you think the Black vote was influenced by their Tribal Culture, instead of, I don't know, a long continued kneejerk reaction to the fact that they were slaves/second class citizens for about 300 years and they vote the party that seems far more certain to defend their current position in society. AKA; wouldn't make offensively idiotic threads like this.
It's only offensive to you.

What is the number one social rule of a tribal culture?

Don't get kicked out of the tribe.

If you don't see that behavior in American blacks, you are simply not looking.

I am not passing judgment on it. I am saying it exists. It does.

If you find that offensive, that's a personal problem.

Hell under that definition, any white person that is a part of one of the two major political parties is influenced by tribalism. What's the number one social rule of those parties? Don't do anything that will get you ostracized and kicked out.
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2012 12:23 PM by nomad2u2001.)
11-10-2012 12:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,356
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #123
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 12:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:40 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:34 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:27 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:22 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  At least it is in government and not in the hands of a bunch of fake charities.

I would trust the Salvation Army and the Red Cross more with my money than any government agency.

That is REDISTRIBUTION first of all. Secondly, that is addiing a middle man. Finally, a ton of fake charities will then pop up and want a piece of the action, which would be worse than the supposed government give away that you are railing against.

Only a careless moron gives the fruits of their labor to "fake charities".

Charity is voluntary and altruistic....Government programs are financed at the point of a gun. Putting a gun to peoples heads just because you think something should be done about a problem is a violent, savage way to operate.

There are fake charities under investigation by the IRS and State governments right now. And careless morons are the ones who gave them money.

So you are in agreement with him? Don't you think that those fake charities may be outweighed by those that are reputable?

Anyway, I do think that we're in way too deep to make meaningful cuts to social programs and transfer their purpose to charities. Not only are there too many people that depend on the system, there are too many that work for the system.
11-10-2012 12:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #124
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 12:32 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:40 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:34 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:27 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I would trust the Salvation Army and the Red Cross more with my money than any government agency.

That is REDISTRIBUTION first of all. Secondly, that is addiing a middle man. Finally, a ton of fake charities will then pop up and want a piece of the action, which would be worse than the supposed government give away that you are railing against.

Only a careless moron gives the fruits of their labor to "fake charities".

Charity is voluntary and altruistic....Government programs are financed at the point of a gun. Putting a gun to peoples heads just because you think something should be done about a problem is a violent, savage way to operate.

There are fake charities under investigation by the IRS and State governments right now. And careless morons are the ones who gave them money.

So you are in agreement with him? Don't you think that those fake charities may be outweighed by those that are reputable?

Anyway, I do think that we're in way too deep to make meaningful cuts to social programs and transfer their purpose to charities. Not only are there too many people that depend on the system, there are too many that work for the system.

To an extent I am, but by redistributing to charities you will inadvertently have to create more government to monitor the charities. I understood what he was saying I concur to an extent.
11-10-2012 01:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #125
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:59 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:47 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  What is it in white, majority culture, which makes them think Romneys 47% comment wasn't a big deal? The people in that audience clapped and thought "Wow, that's a good point". No, it was an awful point. That 47% includes most service people, working single mothers, many teachers, servers, dishwashers, landscapers, untold millions of hardworking people throughout the united states, and you simply categorized them into one monolithic group of freeloading moochers because they don't make enough money to qualify paying a single tax out of hundreds of taxes they do pay.

It's a despicable way of thinking, and it's only going to result in more losses.

Well, when roughly 50% of the people pay income taxes and 50% don't pay income taxes, you're going to create resentment eventually. That's a natural human reaction. Many people are tired of doing all the heavy lifting while being told that they're the "evil 1%".

Is it politically wise to express feelings of resentment? No. But it's still there and understandably so.

I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.
11-10-2012 01:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #126
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
Quote:It's only offensive to you.

What is the number one social rule of a tribal culture?

Don't get kicked out of the tribe.

If you don't see that behavior in American blacks, you are simply not looking.

I am not passing judgment on it. I am saying it exists. It does.

If you find that offensive, that's a personal problem.

It's offensive to me because of it's idiocy, not because of any racial undertones. The sheer thought that you think you can break down such a complex and multifaceted social question with 'um tribal something or other' is f*cking absurdity to the nth degree.

They vote the way that they do because of your policies. When you explain how you vote, you explain your opinions on issues and why you feel your candidate is better going to address them. Minorities? OOGA BOOGA MY TRIBE CAN'T THROW ME OUT!

Christ almighty you're a simpleton.
11-10-2012 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcat_Bounce Offline
God Like Summoner

Posts: 6,467
Joined: Mar 2011
I Root For: Winners
Location: Under a Bridge
Post: #127
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
The GOP will not win another presidential election as long as they characterize those who vote democrat as lazy and dependent on the government. It is really that simple.
11-10-2012 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #128
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 01:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:59 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:47 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  What is it in white, majority culture, which makes them think Romneys 47% comment wasn't a big deal? The people in that audience clapped and thought "Wow, that's a good point". No, it was an awful point. That 47% includes most service people, working single mothers, many teachers, servers, dishwashers, landscapers, untold millions of hardworking people throughout the united states, and you simply categorized them into one monolithic group of freeloading moochers because they don't make enough money to qualify paying a single tax out of hundreds of taxes they do pay.

It's a despicable way of thinking, and it's only going to result in more losses.

Well, when roughly 50% of the people pay income taxes and 50% don't pay income taxes, you're going to create resentment eventually. That's a natural human reaction. Many people are tired of doing all the heavy lifting while being told that they're the "evil 1%".

Is it politically wise to express feelings of resentment? No. But it's still there and understandably so.

I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.

Some valid points. But try to see it from the other side:

My father did everything right. He served his country (Korean War vet), went to college and got a degree, and then had a very successful business career with a top 5 corporation. But while we were kids, he was paying 50%+ of his income in taxes (local suburban taxes, NYC income taxes, NY state taxes, federal taxes). He would essentially work January to July for the government, then August to December for his family. That's just sick.
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2012 02:05 PM by UConn-SMU.)
11-10-2012 02:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #129
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 02:04 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 01:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:59 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:47 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  What is it in white, majority culture, which makes them think Romneys 47% comment wasn't a big deal? The people in that audience clapped and thought "Wow, that's a good point". No, it was an awful point. That 47% includes most service people, working single mothers, many teachers, servers, dishwashers, landscapers, untold millions of hardworking people throughout the united states, and you simply categorized them into one monolithic group of freeloading moochers because they don't make enough money to qualify paying a single tax out of hundreds of taxes they do pay.

It's a despicable way of thinking, and it's only going to result in more losses.

Well, when roughly 50% of the people pay income taxes and 50% don't pay income taxes, you're going to create resentment eventually. That's a natural human reaction. Many people are tired of doing all the heavy lifting while being told that they're the "evil 1%".

Is it politically wise to express feelings of resentment? No. But it's still there and understandably so.

I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.

Some valid points. But try to see it from the other side:

My father did everything right. He served his country (Korean War vet), went to college and got a degree, and then had a very successful business career with a top 5 corporation. But while we were kids, he was paying 50%+ of his income in taxes (local suburban taxes, NYC income taxes, NY state taxes, federal taxes). He would essentially work January to July for the government, then August to December for his family. That's just sick.

Again; that is a phony argument. You are trying to equate the payment of income taxes by people like you and me to people who don't pay income taxes, because they don't make enough money. The fact that those people don't pay income taxes is a government decision based on the fact that those folks are already burden more heavily on payroll taxes and at the local and state level or an overall % of taxes; than is a wealthy person.

Your disgust should be based on how a person that is an investor in securities and other passive activities; are allowed to game the tax system by using capital gains and losses. It seems like their tax rate should be higher than a guy that is using that rate in response to say buying or selling piece of equipment or otherwise dropping capital into his going concern enterprise that he is actively participating in. Something seems wrong about that.
11-10-2012 02:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mixduptransistor Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,987
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UAB
Location: Atlanta
Post: #130
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 02:04 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 01:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:59 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:47 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  What is it in white, majority culture, which makes them think Romneys 47% comment wasn't a big deal? The people in that audience clapped and thought "Wow, that's a good point". No, it was an awful point. That 47% includes most service people, working single mothers, many teachers, servers, dishwashers, landscapers, untold millions of hardworking people throughout the united states, and you simply categorized them into one monolithic group of freeloading moochers because they don't make enough money to qualify paying a single tax out of hundreds of taxes they do pay.

It's a despicable way of thinking, and it's only going to result in more losses.

Well, when roughly 50% of the people pay income taxes and 50% don't pay income taxes, you're going to create resentment eventually. That's a natural human reaction. Many people are tired of doing all the heavy lifting while being told that they're the "evil 1%".

Is it politically wise to express feelings of resentment? No. But it's still there and understandably so.

I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.

Some valid points. But try to see it from the other side:

My father did everything right. He served his country (Korean War vet), went to college and got a degree, and then had a very successful business career with a top 5 corporation. But while we were kids, he was paying 50%+ of his income in taxes (local suburban taxes, NYC income taxes, NY state taxes, federal taxes). He would essentially work January to July for the government, then August to December for his family. That's just sick.

Let me start by saying an effective overall tax rate of 50% is pretty high, and I'm not necessarily advocating for that level of overall taxation, but did your father not get anything for that money? Did he not get a college education? Did he not get paid as a veteran (as he absolutely should have)? Was he not eligible for VA Benefits throughout his life? Was he not a consumer of mass transit in NYC? Did he ever fly out of a New York City airport?

Most of that money didn't go to welfare queens paying for crack with food stamps. Most of that money went to pay for things that make living in America, and particularly living in a large American city, a tolerable, functional experience. Airports and roads and police and subways and buses and fire trucks don't pay for themselves. This is the other half of the "government handout" argument that kind of pisses me off. Most government spending, especially at the state and local level, goes to pay for things that everyone uses, and life in this country would be significantly worse off if we didn't have them. Trust me, I live in Birmingham, Alabama which has no functional transit system, clogged interstates, and none of the cultural facilities that most modern American cities take for granted.
11-10-2012 02:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #131
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 12:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:40 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:34 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:27 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:22 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  At least it is in government and not in the hands of a bunch of fake charities.

I would trust the Salvation Army and the Red Cross more with my money than any government agency.

That is REDISTRIBUTION first of all. Secondly, that is addiing a middle man. Finally, a ton of fake charities will then pop up and want a piece of the action, which would be worse than the supposed government give away that you are railing against.

Only a careless moron gives the fruits of their labor to "fake charities".

Charity is voluntary and altruistic....Government programs are financed at the point of a gun. Putting a gun to peoples heads just because you think something should be done about a problem is a violent, savage way to operate.

There are fake charities under investigation by the IRS and State governments right now. And careless morons are the ones who gave them money.

Yep.
11-10-2012 02:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #132
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 12:32 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:40 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:34 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:27 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I would trust the Salvation Army and the Red Cross more with my money than any government agency.

That is REDISTRIBUTION first of all. Secondly, that is addiing a middle man. Finally, a ton of fake charities will then pop up and want a piece of the action, which would be worse than the supposed government give away that you are railing against.

Only a careless moron gives the fruits of their labor to "fake charities".

Charity is voluntary and altruistic....Government programs are financed at the point of a gun. Putting a gun to peoples heads just because you think something should be done about a problem is a violent, savage way to operate.

There are fake charities under investigation by the IRS and State governments right now. And careless morons are the ones who gave them money.

So you are in agreement with him? Don't you think that those fake charities may be outweighed by those that are reputable?

Anyway, I do think that we're in way too deep to make meaningful cuts to social programs and transfer their purpose to charities. Not only are there too many people that depend on the system, there are too many that work for the system.

We are in too deep to cut anything. That is why we are circling the drain. No one wants their welfare program cut. Social welfare, Corporate welfare, Farm welfare, Industrial Military welfare...the list is a mile long that involves either subsidies or outright give away's from the fruits of our labors.

News Flash....The segment of the population that is actually paying taxes is NOT growing in population. What is going to happen when the those taking subsidies out number those financing them? The tipping point is not far away IMO.
11-10-2012 03:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #133
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 02:43 PM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 02:04 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 01:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:59 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Well, when roughly 50% of the people pay income taxes and 50% don't pay income taxes, you're going to create resentment eventually. That's a natural human reaction. Many people are tired of doing all the heavy lifting while being told that they're the "evil 1%".

Is it politically wise to express feelings of resentment? No. But it's still there and understandably so.

I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.

Some valid points. But try to see it from the other side:

My father did everything right. He served his country (Korean War vet), went to college and got a degree, and then had a very successful business career with a top 5 corporation. But while we were kids, he was paying 50%+ of his income in taxes (local suburban taxes, NYC income taxes, NY state taxes, federal taxes). He would essentially work January to July for the government, then August to December for his family. That's just sick.

Let me start by saying an effective overall tax rate of 50% is pretty high, and I'm not necessarily advocating for that level of overall taxation, but did your father not get anything for that money? Did he not get a college education? Did he not get paid as a veteran (as he absolutely should have)? Was he not eligible for VA Benefits throughout his life? Was he not a consumer of mass transit in NYC? Did he ever fly out of a New York City airport?

Most of that money didn't go to welfare queens paying for crack with food stamps. Most of that money went to pay for things that make living in America, and particularly living in a large American city, a tolerable, functional experience. Airports and roads and police and subways and buses and fire trucks don't pay for themselves. This is the other half of the "government handout" argument that kind of pisses me off. Most government spending, especially at the state and local level, goes to pay for things that everyone uses, and life in this country would be significantly worse off if we didn't have them. Trust me, I live in Birmingham, Alabama which has no functional transit system, clogged interstates, and none of the cultural facilities that most modern American cities take for granted.

I have zero problem paying for things I use....period. I object strongly to paying for things I don't. I have zero problem helping support those that are not able bodied and can not support themselves and am happy to contribute to that cause. I strongly object to supporting able bodied people that simply are gaming the system....period.
11-10-2012 03:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #134
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 02:58 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:40 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:34 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 10:27 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I would trust the Salvation Army and the Red Cross more with my money than any government agency.

That is REDISTRIBUTION first of all. Secondly, that is addiing a middle man. Finally, a ton of fake charities will then pop up and want a piece of the action, which would be worse than the supposed government give away that you are railing against.

Only a careless moron gives the fruits of their labor to "fake charities".

Charity is voluntary and altruistic....Government programs are financed at the point of a gun. Putting a gun to peoples heads just because you think something should be done about a problem is a violent, savage way to operate.

There are fake charities under investigation by the IRS and State governments right now. And careless morons are the ones who gave them money.

Yep.
Ayn, I am surprised you think that fake charities are a bad thing. THey are just using the free market to enrich themselves to satisfy their greed.
11-10-2012 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mixduptransistor Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,987
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UAB
Location: Atlanta
Post: #135
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 03:14 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 02:43 PM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 02:04 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 01:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.

Some valid points. But try to see it from the other side:

My father did everything right. He served his country (Korean War vet), went to college and got a degree, and then had a very successful business career with a top 5 corporation. But while we were kids, he was paying 50%+ of his income in taxes (local suburban taxes, NYC income taxes, NY state taxes, federal taxes). He would essentially work January to July for the government, then August to December for his family. That's just sick.

Let me start by saying an effective overall tax rate of 50% is pretty high, and I'm not necessarily advocating for that level of overall taxation, but did your father not get anything for that money? Did he not get a college education? Did he not get paid as a veteran (as he absolutely should have)? Was he not eligible for VA Benefits throughout his life? Was he not a consumer of mass transit in NYC? Did he ever fly out of a New York City airport?

Most of that money didn't go to welfare queens paying for crack with food stamps. Most of that money went to pay for things that make living in America, and particularly living in a large American city, a tolerable, functional experience. Airports and roads and police and subways and buses and fire trucks don't pay for themselves. This is the other half of the "government handout" argument that kind of pisses me off. Most government spending, especially at the state and local level, goes to pay for things that everyone uses, and life in this country would be significantly worse off if we didn't have them. Trust me, I live in Birmingham, Alabama which has no functional transit system, clogged interstates, and none of the cultural facilities that most modern American cities take for granted.

I have zero problem paying for things I use....period. I object strongly to paying for things I don't. I have zero problem helping support those that are not able bodied and can not support themselves and am happy to contribute to that cause. I strongly object to supporting able bodied people that simply are gaming the system....period.

The problem with the "paying for things I use...period" is that you get benefits from some things the government does that you don't use. The best example from where I live, is mass transit. We don't have a mass transit system and people don't want to pay for it. The thing is, though, that with something like that you have less traffic on the highway. Low income workers can make it to low income jobs so you can buy $1 hamburgers at McDonalds. Same thing with airports. Business in the area grows because of these infrastructures and the overall economy improves. Just because you don't personally use a given government-provided service doesn't mean that you don't benefit from it.
11-10-2012 03:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Online
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,833
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #136
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 03:27 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Ayn, I am surprised you think that fake charities are a bad thing. THey are just using the free market to enrich themselves to satisfy their greed.

As opposed to government bureaucrats stealing from taxpayers to satisfy their greed.
11-10-2012 03:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #137
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 03:28 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 03:27 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Ayn, I am surprised you think that fake charities are a bad thing. THey are just using the free market to enrich themselves to satisfy their greed.

As opposed to government bureaucrats stealing from taxpayers to satisfy their greed.
Yeah, right. Here we go again with the stealing from taxpayers bull ****.
11-10-2012 03:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #138
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 02:04 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 01:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 12:17 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:59 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 11:47 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  What is it in white, majority culture, which makes them think Romneys 47% comment wasn't a big deal? The people in that audience clapped and thought "Wow, that's a good point". No, it was an awful point. That 47% includes most service people, working single mothers, many teachers, servers, dishwashers, landscapers, untold millions of hardworking people throughout the united states, and you simply categorized them into one monolithic group of freeloading moochers because they don't make enough money to qualify paying a single tax out of hundreds of taxes they do pay.

It's a despicable way of thinking, and it's only going to result in more losses.

Well, when roughly 50% of the people pay income taxes and 50% don't pay income taxes, you're going to create resentment eventually. That's a natural human reaction. Many people are tired of doing all the heavy lifting while being told that they're the "evil 1%".

Is it politically wise to express feelings of resentment? No. But it's still there and understandably so.

I love phony arguments, because the reason that a lot of people don't pay income taxes is because they don't make enough money. However, those people pay payroll taxes. See that is what is hidden in the phoney argument; 61% of the people who don't pay income tax actually pay payroll taxes. They also pay other local and state taxes.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/...taxes-too/

That was my point too, they pay innumerable other taxes, at the federal, state, and local level.

But what they don't grasp, and their rhetoric shows this, those hardworking members of the 47% hate welfare queens too. We hate those who game the system for their benefits, we truly do. The only difference is, we are more likely to have known someone who has used those social programs, or currently rely on such programs, and know that the boogeyman of those types of people are the extreme minority.

This explains the disconnect many elderly white voters have with SS and Medicare, and mentally separating those two programs from social programs, despite them being so. They know they rely on them, they know many of their friends and loved ones rely on them, so they know that these aren't really social programs like Welfare or food stamps, those people are just moochers and internally, they compartmentalize their feelings about social programs to only mean those social programs. The 47% is more likely to know people who have effectively used and benefited from the social programs, as intended, so the scare tactics of WELFARE QUEEN! and EBT FOR DRUGS! don't work as well.

And as for being tired of something, try working two jobs to support your family and being sh*t on by a guy like Romney for not earning enough to pay income taxes. Try riding a bus from one job to the next, wondering how you're going to pay rent and knowing you can't afford a mediocre christmas for your kids, and then hearing Romney campaign on the 'WAHHH OBAMA IS ATTACKING THE RICH! WAAHHHH' line. Knowing you can't afford to help your kids go to college and having Romney state 'WELL Y U NO BORROW MONEY FROM YOUR PARENTS?!'. That's what the Right doesn't understand, they claim to be the party of the worker, but from a workers point of view, that's an absurd construct.

Some valid points. But try to see it from the other side:

My father did everything right. He served his country (Korean War vet), went to college and got a degree, and then had a very successful business career with a top 5 corporation. But while we were kids, he was paying 50%+ of his income in taxes (local suburban taxes, NYC income taxes, NY state taxes, federal taxes). He would essentially work January to July for the government, then August to December for his family. That's just sick.

If he went to college, he did so on the backs of american taxpayers. His business thrived because of infrastructure paid for by others, his employees education was paid for by others, his higher likelihood of overall health was paid for by others. Your father might have done everything right but that doesn't preclude him from accepting where and how others, through the programs and process of the government, helped him achieve what he did.

As for his tax rate, did he get nothing in return for that? How much of that went to SS or Medicaid, programs that you receive returns on? Even if he wasn't ever on Welfare, does he not benefit from having it available as a societal safety net?

For instance; If I buy health insurance and pay more into it than I receive from it every year, am I still not gaining a benefit from having it? At the personal level, no, and that's where you draw the line. But everything in life, *ESPECIALLY ONES HEALTH* boils down to a random number generator. You can weigh it accordingly, say by eating right or not smoking, but in the end, most diseases are just a result of relatively random events that one cannot control, or had no knowledge at the time of their ability to control it (think asbestos/early radiologists). This simple concept can be found true in most aspects of ones life, and the problem is the way you choose to look at it. Instead of being upset over paying for welfare for others, be thankful that, holy sh*t, I'm lucky enough to never having had to use it. Instead of being upset that you paid for health insurance and didn't get your moneys worth, be happy that, holy sh*t, you're healthy enough that you didn't have to use your insurance this year. But if you focus on these small, partisan specific microtransactions that you see no benefit from, you lose sight of the overall positive or negative effects your views have.
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2012 04:23 PM by UCF08.)
11-10-2012 04:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Claw Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,986
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1231
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #139
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 01:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
Quote:It's only offensive to you.

What is the number one social rule of a tribal culture?

Don't get kicked out of the tribe.

If you don't see that behavior in American blacks, you are simply not looking.

I am not passing judgment on it. I am saying it exists. It does.

If you find that offensive, that's a personal problem.

It's offensive to me because of it's idiocy, not because of any racial undertones. The sheer thought that you think you can break down such a complex and multifaceted social question with 'um tribal something or other' is f*cking absurdity to the nth degree.

They vote the way that they do because of your policies. When you explain how you vote, you explain your opinions on issues and why you feel your candidate is better going to address them. Minorities? OOGA BOOGA MY TRIBE CAN'T THROW ME OUT!

Christ almighty you're a simpleton.
Why don't you explain to me what a modern day Uncle Tom is?
11-10-2012 04:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #140
RE: What is it in minority culture .....
(11-10-2012 04:42 PM)Claw Wrote:  
(11-10-2012 01:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
Quote:It's only offensive to you.

What is the number one social rule of a tribal culture?

Don't get kicked out of the tribe.

If you don't see that behavior in American blacks, you are simply not looking.

I am not passing judgment on it. I am saying it exists. It does.

If you find that offensive, that's a personal problem.

It's offensive to me because of it's idiocy, not because of any racial undertones. The sheer thought that you think you can break down such a complex and multifaceted social question with 'um tribal something or other' is f*cking absurdity to the nth degree.

They vote the way that they do because of your policies. When you explain how you vote, you explain your opinions on issues and why you feel your candidate is better going to address them. Minorities? OOGA BOOGA MY TRIBE CAN'T THROW ME OUT!

Christ almighty you're a simpleton.
Why don't you explain to me what a modern day Uncle Tom is?

It's a term that is thrown around inaccurately by unintelligent people who try to feed on others fears of past, concrete threats. Much like "communism/socialism" for the right. It is in no way meaningful in it's own right, and anyone who uses it lightly should be ignored.
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2012 04:46 PM by UCF08.)
11-10-2012 04:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.