RE: Chip Brown on FSU and Big 12 expansion
Let's keep in mind this is about two entities who are "in a bind", so to speak, UT and FSU. FSU's monetary problems are known but UT's potential monetary problems keep getting glossed over.
In regard to the LHN, this was the last word I could find on it's distribution so far from wiki (so I suppose there could be updated distribution):
The channel has yet to reach agreements with the major providers in Texas: Time Warner Cable, Comcast, Charter Communications, AT&T U-verse, DirecTV and Dish Network. Time Warner Cable has declined to officially comment on carriage talks, but sources familiar with the negotiations said the parties remain far apart. It is unknown where Comcast and Dish Network are at in negotiations.
When asked whether they'll carry the channel, DirecTV issued the following statement: "We've had discussions with ESPN about Longhorn Network, but we have no plans right now to carry it.
We understand Longhorn has other programming that may be of value to a small segment of our customers, but two UT football games do not constitute a network. We're happy to carry those two games under the considerable fees we already pay ESPN for programming that includes the Big 12. Given the dynamic situation in college football conferences today, we'll wait and see how it all shakes out before we decide what we will or won't carry."
That other content was Texas high school football games until both the Big 12 momentarily put a stop to it and then the NCAA ruled on it and killed it.
From the initial announcement of the Longhorn Network, ESPN had made it known that they desired to broadcast up to 18 high school football games per season. The idea caused quite an uproar among the other conference schools due to possible ethical and recruiting violations. During an August 1, 2011, meeting of all Big 12 athletic directors, it was decided that the issue of broadcasting high school football games on the network would be postponed for one year. This would allow time for the NCAA to rule on the matter. On August 11, 2011, the NCAA ruled that no school or conference network would be permitted to broadcast high school sports or any other high school programming, effectively bringing the issue to a close.
When the news of LHN came out around the same time there was discussion of a PTN coming about on top of the already established BTN, there was a Sports Journal or Sports Business article that asked media experts what college related network would not be around in 5 years - the consensus winner was the LHN.
Personally, I think even conference networks could have problems down the road in an a la carte environment, but the government still has way too many fringe networks it wants to keep running content that a la carte would likely make untenable so I don't foresee this for another decade or so.
Interesting times indeed.
Cheers,
Neil
|