Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Official ULM Thread
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
insideualr Offline
Lord of the Trojans
*

Posts: 8,566
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UALR
Location: The Rock
Post: #1
Official ULM Thread
http://ulm.scout.com/

Latest News

http://www.thenewsstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll...1101080331

Top Producers

POINTS PPG FG% FT% 3PT%
F. Brown 13.5 .388 .679 .369
H. Mingo 12.4 .417 .724 .314
REBOUNDS REB OFF DEF BPG
T. Sykes 6.6 3.5 3.2 0.4
L. Gilbert 5.4 1.6 3.8 0.2
ASSISTS APG SPG TO AST/TO
F. Brown 2.9 1.6 3.3 0.9
M. Hansberry 2.1 0.6 1.9 1.1

ULM has 3 D1 wins this year. 0 - 3 in conference at this point.

Outlook

This is a must win for us against a team tailor made for us. Lots of small bigs that Bails should be able to score on. Like us they have a ton of 6'2" or less players.
01-09-2011 01:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


LRTrojan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,477
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 19
I Root For: UALR Trojans
Location: Sherwood
Post: #2
RE: Official ULM Thread
I thought our guys played well last night, although I'm not sure how bad Troy is. Beating a 2-13 team doesn't tell me much. They didn't look all that bad, but they were playing us too, so the jury is still out on the Trojans.
01-09-2011 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
insideualr Offline
Lord of the Trojans
*

Posts: 8,566
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UALR
Location: The Rock
Post: #3
RE: Official ULM Thread
Bob, I think they went to OT with Miss St. and they just got back their best player. I don't think they are great but I think they are at least middle of the road. I don't know what that tells us either. We just need to beat the bad teams: ULM, ULL, & FIU. Just get me back to "The Jack" .500 for the stAte game.
01-09-2011 02:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Scotto Offline
03.08.11
*

Posts: 4,977
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 15
I Root For: Longshot to Win
Location: The Outpost
Post: #4
RE: Official ULM Thread
That would be winning the next 3 out of 4. Doable, but you're right, we've got to beat the ones you named.
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2011 02:08 PM by Scotto.)
01-09-2011 02:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,651
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-09-2011 02:08 PM)Scotto Wrote:  That would be winning the next 3 out of 4. Doable, but you're right, we've got to beat the ones you named.

I'd love to split the Florida trip. I saw 2 losses there last year. I hoping to see one win this year, but I'm not particular optimistic. I think they may finish 1st and 2nd in the East. Pretty sure FAU will, and I think FIU might with 2 of Isiah's better recruits becoming eligible at semester.
01-09-2011 04:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MICHAELSPAPPY Online
Legend
*

Posts: 26,815
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 33
I Root For: CHI ST, CROWLEY, TEX WES
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Post: #6
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-09-2011 04:13 PM)mjs Wrote:  I'd love to split the Florida trip.

Oh, I would be thrilled to get a win in Florida. What was once a fairly easy trip has turned into possibly the worst we make.
01-09-2011 04:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,651
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-09-2011 04:40 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:13 PM)mjs Wrote:  I'd love to split the Florida trip.

Oh, I would be thrilled to get a win in Florida. What was once a fairly easy trip has turned into possibly the worst we make.

I had a feeling that would happen eventually. They've got the Florida talent pool to recruit from. Then they have the Florida weather and beaches to lure out of State kids. Now they have two high profile coaches who are going to be attractive to certain kids. And Jarvis and Isiah don't exactly need to be outrecruiting Florida, Fla State, or Miami to win the Sun Belt. Just get some of the leftovers.
01-09-2011 04:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,651
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #8
ULM is typical of what I've been saying about this year's Sun Belt
They are 0-3 so the immediate reaction is "they're bad". I'm not saying they are good, but their losses have been by 2 to FAU and by 1 to FIU. They had Denver down 55-53, but somehow ended up losing 66-57.
So they could easily be 2-1, and 3-0 isn't out of the question. The bad thing for them is that they haven't played a conference road game. I don't think anyone in the conference will have an easy time winning on the road, so we aren't going to see any 16-2 teams this year.
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2011 10:12 PM by mjs.)
01-09-2011 10:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
outsideualr Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,770
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 12
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-09-2011 04:52 PM)mjs Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:40 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:13 PM)mjs Wrote:  I'd love to split the Florida trip.

Oh, I would be thrilled to get a win in Florida. What was once a fairly easy trip has turned into possibly the worst we make.

I had a feeling that would happen eventually. They've got the Florida talent pool to recruit from. Then they have the Florida weather and beaches to lure out of State kids. Now they have two high profile coaches who are going to be attractive to certain kids. And Jarvis and Isiah don't exactly need to be outrecruiting Florida, Fla State, or Miami to win the Sun Belt. Just get some of the leftovers.

Simple solution. We build a humongous bikini beach here in Little Rock.
That will attract all sort of talent. That's probably how Duke, Syracuse, Kansas, Michigan, Butler and others get all that talent year after year. Perfect climate.
01-10-2011 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,651
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-10-2011 12:48 PM)outsideualr Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:52 PM)mjs Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:40 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:13 PM)mjs Wrote:  I'd love to split the Florida trip.

Oh, I would be thrilled to get a win in Florida. What was once a fairly easy trip has turned into possibly the worst we make.

I had a feeling that would happen eventually. They've got the Florida talent pool to recruit from. Then they have the Florida weather and beaches to lure out of State kids. Now they have two high profile coaches who are going to be attractive to certain kids. And Jarvis and Isiah don't exactly need to be outrecruiting Florida, Fla State, or Miami to win the Sun Belt. Just get some of the leftovers.

Simple solution. We build a humongous bikini beach here in Little Rock.
That will attract all sort of talent. That's probably how Duke, Syracuse, Kansas, Michigan, Butler and others get all that talent year after year. Perfect climate.

North Carolina's climate is okay, but I'm not sold on the other schools you mention. Kansas and Butler do demolish my old theory that we "need a new arena" to be successful. They both have facilities that are probably more than 70 years old. Kansas has a metal structure with 15,000 bleacher seats. Does have a ton of tradition as does Hinkle Fieldhouse at Butler. Syracuse is likely helped by the Carrier Dome and the 35,000 fans who show up for conference games. Michigan may have the #1 athletic program in the country, overall. We have some recruiting advantages and disadvantages. Could we recruit better? Maybe so. How much better is realistic is the question I can't answer.
01-10-2011 02:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
insideualr Offline
Lord of the Trojans
*

Posts: 8,566
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UALR
Location: The Rock
Post: #11
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-10-2011 02:36 PM)mjs Wrote:  
(01-10-2011 12:48 PM)outsideualr Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:52 PM)mjs Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:40 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  
(01-09-2011 04:13 PM)mjs Wrote:  I'd love to split the Florida trip.

Oh, I would be thrilled to get a win in Florida. What was once a fairly easy trip has turned into possibly the worst we make.

I had a feeling that would happen eventually. They've got the Florida talent pool to recruit from. Then they have the Florida weather and beaches to lure out of State kids. Now they have two high profile coaches who are going to be attractive to certain kids. And Jarvis and Isiah don't exactly need to be outrecruiting Florida, Fla State, or Miami to win the Sun Belt. Just get some of the leftovers.

Simple solution. We build a humongous bikini beach here in Little Rock.
That will attract all sort of talent. That's probably how Duke, Syracuse, Kansas, Michigan, Butler and others get all that talent year after year. Perfect climate.

North Carolina's climate is okay, but I'm not sold on the other schools you mention. Kansas and Butler do demolish my old theory that we "need a new arena" to be successful. They both have facilities that are probably more than 70 years old. Kansas has a metal structure with 15,000 bleacher seats. Does have a ton of tradition as does Hinkle Fieldhouse at Butler. Syracuse is likely helped by the Carrier Dome and the 35,000 fans who show up for conference games. Michigan may have the #1 athletic program in the country, overall. We have some recruiting advantages and disadvantages. Could we recruit better? Maybe so. How much better is realistic is the question I can't answer.

OK, I will play

On bigs we probably recruit at about what I would expect a SBC team to recruit. Guards on the other hand have been below average for years imo. The couple of years we were not able to land a pg and Patterson and Wright had to play the pg were the fault of the coaching staff period. There are tons of pg's out there.
01-10-2011 03:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


outsideualr Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,770
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 12
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Official ULM Thread
I might tend to disagree a little with you here on the big guys. I don't think our bigs have been anywhere near as good as a number I've seen come through here. And we've missed on some guards, but I think our guards this year, as a group, as pretty good when given the opportunity to play to their abilities. We'll know more about it all as we go along. Right now, I don't really know what to expect from game to game. I just want us to play more exciting ball, as we've begun to do a little. We're pressing more and trying to run a little more.
Someone said I should watch Duke play. When they get the ball off the boards they try and press it down court and usually have a wing in each corner ready to receive the ball and take a three point shot in transition. That's a fun style to watch. We're not going to win every game no matter what style of play we employ. If we're going to lose, I want to go down shooting three's and moving it up and down the court when possible. Not street ball, but a faster pace with organization.
01-10-2011 04:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
LRTrojan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,477
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 19
I Root For: UALR Trojans
Location: Sherwood
Post: #13
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-10-2011 03:26 PM)insideualr Wrote:  On bigs we probably recruit at about what I would expect a SBC team to recruit. Guards on the other hand have been below average for years imo. The couple of years we were not able to land a pg and Patterson and Wright had to play the pg were the fault of the coaching staff period. There are tons of pg's out there.

Other than Muntrell Dobbins, I don't think the bigs we've had in the Belt are any better than the ones we had in the TAAC. Obviously J.J. was in a class by himself as a rebounder, but he wasn't much on offense. I'm talking about bigs that could walk, score, and chew gum at the same time.
01-10-2011 05:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
insideualr Offline
Lord of the Trojans
*

Posts: 8,566
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UALR
Location: The Rock
Post: #14
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-10-2011 05:45 PM)LRTrojan Wrote:  
(01-10-2011 03:26 PM)insideualr Wrote:  On bigs we probably recruit at about what I would expect a SBC team to recruit. Guards on the other hand have been below average for years imo. The couple of years we were not able to land a pg and Patterson and Wright had to play the pg were the fault of the coaching staff period. There are tons of pg's out there.

Other than Muntrell Dobbins, I don't think the bigs we've had in the Belt are any better than the ones we had in the TAAC. Obviously J.J. was in a class by himself as a rebounder, but he wasn't much on offense. I'm talking about bigs that could walk, score, and chew gum at the same time.

Holden, Too Tall, Smith, Edwards, JJ, were above average SBC bigs, IMO. This bunch this year is a little below SBC level. If you get some production out of Bails you stand a chance but if you don't we probably have to be hot from the 3.

My big issue is PG play over the last 7 years and the lack of being able to 1 pg that could play each year. IMO, I think you should always have 3 on the roster. 2 that play and one the red shirts. There is no reason not to have a jr or sr running the team ever year with 3 pg's on the team. There is no reason for not being able to recruit pg's. There are tons of them and we are a mid-major.
01-10-2011 09:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MICHAELSPAPPY Online
Legend
*

Posts: 26,815
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 33
I Root For: CHI ST, CROWLEY, TEX WES
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Post: #15
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-10-2011 09:06 PM)insideualr Wrote:  IMO, I think you should always have 3 on the roster. 2 that play and one the red shirts. There is no reason not to have a jr or sr running the team ever year with 3 pg's on the team.


Bingo!
01-11-2011 08:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eh9198 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,950
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 24
I Root For: Little Rock
Location: Little Rock
Post: #16
RE: Official ULM Thread
Didn't JJ average bewtween 10-15 points a game? Pretty good for a Shields offense.
01-11-2011 12:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,651
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-11-2011 12:32 PM)eh9198 Wrote:  Didn't JJ average bewtween 10-15 points a game? Pretty good for a Shields offense.

I don't recall, but I'd take a JJ every year if we could get one.
01-11-2011 12:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MICHAELSPAPPY Online
Legend
*

Posts: 26,815
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 33
I Root For: CHI ST, CROWLEY, TEX WES
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Post: #18
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-11-2011 12:43 PM)mjs Wrote:  
(01-11-2011 12:32 PM)eh9198 Wrote:  Didn't JJ average bewtween 10-15 points a game? Pretty good for a Shields offense.

I don't recall, but I'd take a JJ every year if we could get one.

12.5 ppg both years, according to my records.
01-11-2011 01:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
insideualr Offline
Lord of the Trojans
*

Posts: 8,566
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UALR
Location: The Rock
Post: #19
RE: Official ULM Thread
That feed the post pretty hard while he was here, so that sounds about right. We throw the ball away and he shot a low percentage to get those points. He shot 44% from the field. That is not as low as I thought but the turnovers from forcing it in to hit were maddening.
01-11-2011 05:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
LR Alum Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,042
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 19
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Official ULM Thread
(01-11-2011 05:02 PM)insideualr Wrote:  That feed the post pretty hard while he was here, so that sounds about right. We throw the ball away and he shot a low percentage to get those points. He shot 44% from the field. That is not as low as I thought but the turnovers from forcing it in to hit were maddening.

I enjoyed JJ rebounding but those 2 seasons were the ugliest I've seen. I still remember that nightmare game against FIU when we barely scored in the 1st half.
01-11-2011 05:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.