UALRSuperFan Curtis
Special Teams
Posts: 592
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 8
I Root For: UALR
Location:
|
Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
Could someone please answer this question: Since UNO will leave he conference as of July 1, what would that to to next year's basketball tournament?
|
|
04-05-2010 10:11 PM |
|
PTJR
Heisman
Posts: 6,206
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LR / UR / CU
Location: Little Rock
|
RE: Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
(04-05-2010 10:11 PM)UALRSuperFan Curtis Wrote: Could someone please answer this question: Since UNO will leave he conference as of July 1, what would that to to next year's basketball tournament?
Curtis- I have no specific information on this, but since there will be balanced divisions next year after the departure of UNO, my guess is that the tournament might well be set up on the model that the SEC uses. The top two teams from each side get byes, then go from there.
Actually, as the SEC demonstrated this year, that is really not the best and most equitable way to do things. The SEC west was very weak this year yet still got two top seeds. The Big 12 model of seeding teams without regard to divisions is probably more equitable.
|
|
04-05-2010 11:18 PM |
|
Scotto
03.08.11
Posts: 4,977
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 15
I Root For: Longshot to Win
Location: The Outpost
|
RE: Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
Divisions work when you have more than 10 teams as the schedule is not balanced.
|
|
04-05-2010 11:22 PM |
|
PTJR
Heisman
Posts: 6,206
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LR / UR / CU
Location: Little Rock
|
RE: Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
(04-05-2010 11:22 PM)Scotto Wrote: Divisions work when you have more than 10 teams as the schedule is not balanced.
I wasn't talking about divisions, they will exist for scheduling purposes. I was talking about ignoring divisions for seeding purposes in the conference tournament.
|
|
04-06-2010 08:32 AM |
|
outsideualr
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21,770
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 12
I Root For: UALR
Location:
|
RE: Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
(04-06-2010 08:32 AM)PTJR Wrote: (04-05-2010 11:22 PM)Scotto Wrote: Divisions work when you have more than 10 teams as the schedule is not balanced.
I wasn't talking about divisions, they will exist for scheduling purposes. I was talking about ignoring divisions for seeding purposes in the conference tournament.
That wouldn't make our four Western division banners look as good, would it.
|
|
04-06-2010 10:13 AM |
|
mjs
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21,667
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
|
RE: Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
(04-06-2010 10:13 AM)outsideualr Wrote: (04-06-2010 08:32 AM)PTJR Wrote: (04-05-2010 11:22 PM)Scotto Wrote: Divisions work when you have more than 10 teams as the schedule is not balanced.
I wasn't talking about divisions, they will exist for scheduling purposes. I was talking about ignoring divisions for seeding purposes in the conference tournament.
That wouldn't make our four Western division banners look as good, would it.
I would think the Division winners will still get byes. The question will be who will get the other 2 byes- the second place teams from each Division or the teams with the next 2 best records, regardless of Division. I think if you have Divisions you might as well use the SEC format.
|
|
04-06-2010 12:40 PM |
|
hb8
Bench Warmer
Posts: 191
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
I Root For: stAte
Location:
|
RE: Regarding 2011 SBC Basketball Tournament
MJS has stated the options. The 2 division winners will get byes. The question is whether to give the other two byes to the division runners up or to the two teams with the next best record.
I can live with it either way, but if I had a vote I would go with the two runners up.
Either way, each tournament just got 1 game shorter.
|
|
04-06-2010 12:45 PM |
|