(07-26-2009 12:38 PM)RobertN Wrote: (07-26-2009 10:30 AM)West Is the Best Wrote: dog for his girls.
In 6 months he has not decided on a church when previous presidents had no problem.
Yet, he wants to ram Health Care down our throats before he can conduct a proper study.
Amazing..........
Looks like you are on board with the Republicans "delay healthcare to make it his Waterloo" approach to healthcare instead of actually coming up with a plan.
Robert,
Two questions:
First question, do you expect health care to get better or worse as a result of the changes being proposed?
If your answer to the first question is better, then the second question is how and why do you expect that result?
If your answer to the first question is worse, then the second question is why shouldn't anyone vote no on the bill?
For the record, my answers are "worse, much worse, lower quality at higher cost" to question one, and "no reason why" to question two.
I have not heard his whole thing about "Obama's Waterloo" coming from the republicans (maybe Rush has said this, but I wouldn't know because I don't listen to Rush); I believe the sensible republicans are opposed to the bills being considered because they are bad bills. I've only heard this idea coming from democrats, who seem to be trying to leverage Obama's personal popularity to get a bunch of bad legislation passed.
I will agree with you that the republicans need desperately to come up with a viable alternative instead of just voting no. I would prefer a two-tier system like France, Germany, Switzerland, or Brasil, but there are any number of approaches that are better than the "one size screws all" plans currently under consideration.