(10-28-2026 09:51 AM)HawaiiToNIU Wrote: (10-28-2026 08:41 AM)Dog Fan Wrote: The first thing we need to do is field a team that can win football games - especially at home. Makes no sense to improve anything for the few thousand fans who show up and then leave early. The first priority should be to get the fans back. Wins will bring the fans back, unless they already feel disconnected and ignored.
I would venture to say that there are more “fans” who spend the game tailgating in the parking lot. So maybe instead of improving the stadium at this point, NIU should improve the tailgating experience to attract even more tailgating fans. We could become the school with the best tailgating in the country. I’m starting to think that those who tailgate throughout the game are the smart ones, since they don’t go to the game and watch the garbage on the field.
I agree that a winning football team comes before any improvements to the stadium. I can continue buying season tickets and going to games if there's a team worth watching. Especially in an age of a new and fun conference with interesting opponents.
We really should have made those improvements and fundraised for them, all the years we had a good team. Every year they used to say death, taxes and NIU winning the MAC. Those should have been years we made fundraised and made improvements. We could have had a good team and an okay stadium. Now we have a bad team and a deplorable stadium.
As for tailgating, I feel like tailgating is a culture. People love it. More people tailgate than gone to games at NIU since I can remember. But I also feel like that's true for everyone else too.
This is exactly right. There's no point in spending huge $$$ on Huskie Stadium when even its 23,595 (official) capacity cannot be filled much over half. Tailgating is an alternative, with game itself as a draw to be there on site, but a successful program is still the main draw.
The issues of the success/failure of the football program and HS upgrades need to be addressed and funded separately. The connection is that without a successful program, there's no point spending millions on HS.
Addressing the stadium issue alone, when STF's massive 2014-15 plan was an obvious bust, about eight years ago I proposed a simple plan to upgrade HS (with some background indirectly in land and project planning). Costly, yes, but easier to manage over a number of years. A bunch of Pound posters agreed, but as we all know, plans and ideas and proposals here on the Pound don't go very far, if at all. (NIU admins do not recognize ideas they themselves do not initiate, though they don't initiate many.)
Without going into specifics, as I did then, the idea is simple: make an overall plan of what is needed. Then break it apart into separate elements, with cost estimates for each. Prioritize, and target fundraising at each one; something fans can see and appreciate as they help get it done. Smaller cost targets are easier to deal with and promote.
It will take a number of years, but everyone will know the end goal. At the same time, it will take that time to rebuild the program, expand NIL, and hopefully build some attendance both inside (stadium) and outside (tailgate).
This is not bragging. It was common sense then and is common sense now. Despite more $ through the MW, it's a pittance compared to the cost of these things. The
flow of money needs to be considered.
It will take commitment all around by the NIU admin. And there's our problem.