(10-26-2026 10:34 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: You are a good bit behind in the discussion thread, RWT. Jan. 6 has been discussed.
Your paymaster Soros is going to dock your pay if you don't keep up.
Nope. George pays for all.
And I am not here on the weekends and I have a bunch of the repliers on ignore. So I have not read every post to know whether J6 was ignored like you guys normally do or not.
Doesn't change a thing...there is plenty of evidence of violence from the right.
There is indeed, Tom.
Violence comes from the extremes on both the political right and left.
Thus the reason the great nation needs the "Bill Dazzle Center-Independence Party." No supporter of such a party would ever resort to political violence.
(This post was last modified: 10-26-2026 02:00 PM by bill dazzle.)
(10-26-2026 10:47 AM)VA49er Wrote: The dude wearing the Viking costume tried to topple the United States Constitution all by himself!
Said no one ever, especially me, who wasn't just trying to diminish J6 like you are. Weak.
lol, pretty sure most Dems, which you are not as you say, are 100% behind the notion that 1/6 was some crazy event in which people tried to topple the US govt. That's what they think, no matter how asinine.
(10-26-2026 10:47 AM)VA49er Wrote: The dude wearing the Viking costume tried to topple the United States Constitution all by himself!
Said no one ever, especially me, who wasn't just trying to diminish J6 like you are. Weak.
lol, pretty sure most Dems, which you are not as you say, are 100% behind the notion that 1/6 was some crazy event in which people tried to topple the US govt. That's what they think, no matter how asinine.
No, not really. They were just trying to stop congress from doing their job, which they did, if only for a few hours. That's not trying to topple the Constitution...whatever that even means...nor is it trying to overthrow the government.
You spend too much time listening to right wing characterizations of the left instead of actually listening to the left. You should work on that.
That being said, of course you will always find fringes on both sides who will take everything to the extreme in order to push some narrative. Stop acting like that's the norm or consensus.
(10-26-2026 10:47 AM)VA49er Wrote: The dude wearing the Viking costume tried to topple the United States Constitution all by himself!
Said no one ever, especially me, who wasn't just trying to diminish J6 like you are. Weak.
lol, pretty sure most Dems, which you are not as you say, are 100% behind the notion that 1/6 was some crazy event in which people tried to topple the US govt. That's what they think, no matter how asinine.
No, not really. They were just trying to stop congress from doing their job, which they did, if only for a few hours. That's not trying to topple the Constitution...whatever that even means...nor is it trying to overthrow the government.
You spend too much time listening to right wing characterizations of the left instead of actually listening to the left. You should work on that.
That being said, of course you will always find fringes on both sides who will take everything to the extreme in order to push some narrative. Stop acting like that's the norm or consensus.
What a load of BS that is.
The entire MSM and the entire left wing screamed from the hilltops that our government was nearly overthrown and our democracy nearly fell forever and burned the constitution to the ground.
The totally absurd overselling of that event was a line of BS for the ages.
(10-26-2026 10:47 AM)VA49er Wrote: The dude wearing the Viking costume tried to topple the United States Constitution all by himself!
Said no one ever, especially me, who wasn't just trying to diminish J6 like you are. Weak.
lol, pretty sure most Dems, which you are not as you say, are 100% behind the notion that 1/6 was some crazy event in which people tried to topple the US govt. That's what they think, no matter how asinine.
No, not really. They were just trying to stop congress from doing their job, which they did, if only for a few hours. That's not trying to topple the Constitution...whatever that even means...nor is it trying to overthrow the government.
You spend too much time listening to right wing characterizations of the left instead of actually listening to the left. You should work on that.
That being said, of course you will always find fringes on both sides who will take everything to the extreme in order to push some narrative. Stop acting like that's the norm or consensus.
What a load of BS that is.
The entire MSM and the entire left wing screamed from the hilltops that our government was nearly overthrown and our democracy nearly fell forever and burned the constitution to the ground.
The totally absurd overselling of that event was a line of BS for the ages.
Perhaps first in intensely bogus assertions, but certainly second to the scammed hysteria of COVID 19 where Ivermectin was kept away from needy patients, respirators were used to the detriment of patients, masks they now admit were ineffective were mandatory, schools were closed and those who died from arrhythmias caused by the vaccine were mostly young and healthy, and all of it to steal an election and make 3 Big Pharma companies billions and at taxpayer expense. And for an infectious virus spread by touch the only thing that was needed were gloves, but hey you can't hide the faces of shoplifters and looters with a bunch of gloves! The left is owed an ass whipping of monumental proportions for the atrocities they wrought against their fellow citizens, and I'm not talking posters and misled neighbors, but the media who trumpeted the lies, and the politicians which profited by it. And Fauci,..., he committed crimes against humanity!
(This post was last modified: 10-26-2026 04:20 PM by JRsec.)
(10-25-2026 09:15 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: Fact is you tried to inflate BLM while minimizing J6. Both were violent riots. Fact. You can talk about what led up to each one or what happened after them but the events themselves were riots.
The original argument that ONLY Dems and ALL Dems are violent is just ludicrous. Only a small percentage of the population account for the majority of violent crime. One study showing 1% responsible for 63% of violent crimes. Also men are responsible for 75% of violent crime. Men lean republican and aren’t you guys always talking about how the soy bois of the left couldn’t fight their way out of a wet paper bag? It does happen on both sides. Right now the left is committing more awful acts but let’s not forget the past either.
The us vs them talk is tired. Actually be the difference.
I think you mean "conflate" - - and you are right, it was unfair of me to do so.
Unfair to the to Jan. 6 protesters, that is.
Unlike BLM, which resulted in BILLIONS of damages to American cities, and several dozen directly involved deaths - - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pe...ial_unrest - - the inexcusable Jan. 6 riot resulted only in the direct death of a single protester (by a trigger-happy, and unaccountable Capitol police officer), and convictions and actual jail time for virtually all of those involved (excepting the embedded federal provocateurs).
There is a difference. Political violence is the exception on the right. It is standard operating procedure on the left.
Yep. (And I was gonna say that J6 was a false flag operation anyway. You kinda already said it for me.)
I respect you, G-Coog, but do you really believe the Dems orchestrated the coordination of hundreds of Antifa members attacking the nation's capitol?
Maybe not the DNC itself, but the FBI? Yes, as was proven.
No it wasn’t but let’s say it was for the sake of argument, why are you and the rest who believe that BS believing that same organization is credible and capable now? Don’t make no dang sense.
(This post was last modified: 10-26-2026 04:16 PM by Mr_XcentricK.)
We on the right will stop listening to the right media's characterizations of the left when you and your left wing ilk stop listening to left wing media characterizations of the right.
But we know you and your people on the left won't do it, so we on the right won't do it either.
(This post was last modified: 10-26-2026 04:18 PM by BirdHawkEagle.)
(10-26-2026 04:19 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: Just confirmed:
Chicken horse man believes in everything the Democrat Party tells him and believes it all to be true.
He tells you everything you need to know with his Avatar. It is literally a horse's ass on two legs. Why does everyone act so surprised when he delivers what he advertises.
(10-26-2026 04:19 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: Just confirmed:
Chicken horse man believes in everything the Democrat Party tells him and believes it all to be true.
He tells you everything you need to know with his Avatar. It is literally a horse's ass on two legs. Why does everyone act so surprised when he delivers what he advertises.
I'm not surprised at all.
Especially when this is what I hear when he talks.
(10-26-2026 04:19 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: Just confirmed:
Chicken horse man believes in everything the Democrat Party tells him and believes it all to be true.
He tells you everything you need to know with his Avatar. It is literally a horse's ass on two legs. Why does everyone act so surprised when he delivers what he advertises.
I don't even need an absurd avatar to convey I can be a horse's ass on two legs. I'll just flat-out say it.
(10-26-2026 04:19 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: Just confirmed:
Chicken horse man believes in everything the Democrat Party tells him and believes it all to be true.
He tells you everything you need to know with his Avatar. It is literally a horse's ass on two legs. Why does everyone act so surprised when he delivers what he advertises.
I don't even need an absurd avatar to convey I can be a horse's ass on two legs. I'll just flat-out say it.
Bullshite! If you were half the stud you claim to be you would at least have three!
(10-26-2026 04:19 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: Just confirmed:
Chicken horse man believes in everything the Democrat Party tells him and believes it all to be true.
He tells you everything you need to know with his Avatar. It is literally a horse's ass on two legs. Why does everyone act so surprised when he delivers what he advertises.
I'm not surprised at all.
Especially when this is what I hear when he talks.
Because you have no argument buttercup. I get it. Keep rubbing those two brain cells together. They might just catch fire and provide you an original thought.
10-26-2026 05:15 PM
bill dazzle
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
Posts: 18,607
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 2032
I Root For: Vanderbilt
Location: Nashville
(10-26-2026 04:19 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: Just confirmed:
Chicken horse man believes in everything the Democrat Party tells him and believes it all to be true.
He tells you everything you need to know with his Avatar. It is literally a horse's ass on two legs. Why does everyone act so surprised when he delivers what he advertises.
I don't even need an absurd avatar to convey I can be a horse's ass on two legs. I'll just flat-out say it.
Bullshite! If you were half the stud you claim to be you would at least have three!
"Three Legs" Bill suggests a rough-and-tumble gun-slinging outlaw from the American West, circa 1880.
