(01-07-2026 07:22 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: Here is the first shot, you can’t see the officer who shoots, but you can see his feet behind the door officer. You can see the cloud of gas from the shot in front of the windshield.
He wasn’t in front of the car when he shot, and the car was turning further away from him.
Second shot, you can’t see he is off to the side because the vehicle momentum carried it further away from him. So definitely not in any danger when he fires the second shot.
And here is the third shot where the car is damn near past him. Definitely in zero danger and still shooting.
Bottom line. She was obstructing legal federal law enforcement. Intentionally. She refused to obey orders and tried to flee. One officer still had his arm in the window. The other one was partially in front of the car.
All she had to do was obey their order and not try to flee. Simple. FAFO. Sorry.
Yep. I mean look, my heart goes out to her friends and loved ones, but all she had to do was comply and she didn't. Not their fault she FAFO'ed.
miko: Clicks. "Look at my honey standing up for people breaking the law. Wait. OH MY GOD! SHE'S BEEN SHOT! HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?!?" *rolls eyes* Leftists have no common sense.
Ofer: Don't care. This was self-defense.
According to the neighbor, she was initially told to move her car. Even when the they were running to her. Then they started trying to get her door open and telling her to stop.
Lot to unravel here.
Im so glad we have the worlds best assumption artists working for us above. Amazing that, eh?
Im also so glad that you feel the stick up your ass in your puny little life to maintain the constant barrage of name calling. Cool stuff there, Chowder.
To 3a:
Quote:Bottom line. She was obstructing legal federal law enforcement. Intentionally. She refused to obey orders and tried to flee. One officer still had his arm in the window. The other one was partially in front of the car.
Bottom line obstructing law enforcement doesnt rise to the level of justification for shooting. Nor does 'refusing orders and trying to flee'. The previous being very much up in the air.
But thanks for your god like assumption skills.
I guess if the bottom line for justifying a shooting with the pablum of 'She was obstructing legal federal law enforcement. Intentionally.', I guess it would have been okay to open fire on Trump during his brushes with "obstructing legal federal law enforcement. Intentionally". Cool cool.
The idiotic leaps that are made here are just staggering.
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2026 08:09 PM by tanqtonic.)
(01-07-2026 07:29 PM)stinkfist Wrote: why did she not obey
why was her door locked
why was she there in the middle of fk'n nowhere
these are simple questions that will be asked at wtfe kango-court ensues...
I hope y'all end up sufferin' on every g'damned bit of this stupidity....
Arguing with him is like telling a barking chihuahua to quit yapping. He just won't listen.
I always add when in the moment ... it got better ...
ya ever kicked a chi-chi in into the fence ... I have ... fk those taco hell yippity yip biatches, too ...
btw, nice sig change ...
Thanks. It's from an episode of the [adult swim] tv show Rick and Morty. (Don't go down the rabbit hole right now. It's a little... absurd and way, way out there. Still, I love it. I have the first four seasons on DVD and I'm currently looking for the later seasons. They even had an anime series made in Japan that was shown last year.)
As for ballgargle, too bad we can't kick him over the fence. (I say with a clearly joking tone.)
it's funny ... you remind me of a former roomie that was into the 'toons circa bugs/fudd/daffy ... was funny when he wanted to be ... he's now in VT playin' video games sippin' on the juice ...
and to the anime ... this is what I'm listening to at this veddy momento ... it's been that kind o' day for this guy ...
Uh oh. lol (Kiddin'. I'm getting by... somehow.) I'm currently watching the MST3K FOREVER-a-thon to help me "get back to center" or some ****. (It's something the new age folk say, I think.)
Back on topic: I don't know if I've asked this question, but here it goes. (It's a rhetorical one so I'm not looking for the answer because I know what it is.) Why am I not surprised the resident leftists on this board are defending the attempted murderer's actions and excoriating the federal agent's actions? Even if he wasn't actually in danger, he felt he had reason to believe that he was and acted accordingly. But hey, what do I know? I'm just some guy in Southeast Texas who saw the video and based on my own limited schooling in the field of criminal justice, it looked to me like she was trying to run him over.
Also, how quaint. I got called Chowder. How wonderful. Again, don't care. She was impeding a federal operation, refused to follow orders to vacate her vehicle, and tried to run over a federal agent, leading to her demise. That's what I got from the video. And if anybody doesn't like it? Oh, I don't know, may stay the hell out of the way? Good God, people. (But this will be wrongly laid at the feet of the Trump Administration even though the left's hate-filled rhetoric caused this.)
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2026 08:10 PM by GeminiCoog.)
(01-07-2026 06:52 PM)miko33 Wrote: You’re the one who not seeing it for what it is.
Why was ICE there? Why was she interfering with their work? Why didn’t she immediately give herself up when they were trying to remove her from the situation?
Did you not hear the ice agent who told her to leave?
You didn’t answer my questions.
He's not going to. He's a brainwashed and stupid fool of a leftist hack.
They always deflect. They expect LEO’s to be perfect and never misinterpret a situation. To me she tried to run over an ICE agent from what the videos show. For the sake of argument, let’s say it was a tragic mistake. Why was she there in the first place? Why intentionally put yourself in such a risky position? She caused the situation. If she was inspired to take these actions, it was the fault of the politicians in charge using citizens as pawns in their attempts to deflect from the crimes they’ve committed. Just like terrorist leaders manipulate their followers.
Always give the “trained” law enforcement agents the benefit of the doubt but the untrained citizen is supposed to know which conflicting order to follow to not be executed. Talk about deflecting
Btw, the lady who was killed is from Colorado, had a Missouri license tag, and was in Minnesota.
She was a paid disruptor, and was in the process of notifying residents that ICE was in the area, as said by residents to the media. And also blocking ICE with her vehicle.
Liberal leaders have normalized violence and obstruction when it comes to ICE agents.
The unfortunate incident today magnifies the idiocy of these leftist leaders.
F-ing around and finding out is tragic sometimes and today’s problem lies squarely at the feet of the left.
Quote:The wife of Renee Nicole Good—the 37-year-old Minneapolis shooting victim who attempted to run over an ICE officer—appears to have been outside the vehicle filming as her wife blocked ICE vehicles.
She is seen wearing a flannel shirt, walking around the vehicle and recording ICE officers.
She later runs back to the vehicle to check on Renee.
Afterward, she tells a nearby man, “That’s my wife.”
When he asks if she knows any of her wife’s relatives she could call, she responds
“We're new here. I don't have people... I can’t even breathe right now.”
(01-07-2026 05:34 PM)TripleA Wrote: My gosh ball boy, watch ALL the videos, especially CP's last one just above.
This is crazy like no trolling some of you guys have got to have a bottom it’s one thing to laugh at owning the libs but you guys actually support extrajudicial executions of people?
You do (Ashley Babbitt). So why are you so angry.
Have not read all of this but I hope it was a fat liberal white woman.
(01-07-2026 07:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: "standing and yelling at law enforcement while they are executing their duties is obstruction." No, no it isnt.
Words of a fing authoritarian type there. Cool cool.
Good to know "standing and yelling at law enforcement" is now the sin qua non of obstruction for the charged up MAGA now. Neat stuff.
Even better to know that some agree with the above "1000%". Quite the connoisseurs of civil liberties this board has evolved into.
nobody gives two fks about your pro bono mumbo jumbo bs ... welcome to caveat emptor within the construct of a constitutional republic fighting back ... but keep pos(t)ing...
(01-07-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote: Btw, the lady who was killed is from Colorado, had a Missouri license tag, and was in Minnesota.
She was a paid disruptor, and was in the process of notifying residents that ICE was in the area, as said by residents to the media. And also blocking ICE with her vehicle.
We are still allowed to travel without showing our papers.
So you are advocating for executing everyone with out of state plates? Otherwise I’m not sure your point is relevant.
(01-07-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote: Btw, the lady who was killed is from Colorado, had a Missouri license tag, and was in Minnesota.
She was a paid disruptor, and was in the process of notifying residents that ICE was in the area, as said by residents to the media. And also blocking ICE with her vehicle.
We are still allowed to travel without showing our papers.
So you are advocating for executing everyone with out of state plates? Otherwise I’m not sure your point is relevant.
Shooting people that try to hit you with a car?
All damn day
Break the law and find out how it goes if you dont "show your papers". Prove you mean it. Report back.
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2026 08:13 PM by shere khan.)
(01-07-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote: Btw, the lady who was killed is from Colorado, had a Missouri license tag, and was in Minnesota.
She was a paid disruptor, and was in the process of notifying residents that ICE was in the area, as said by residents to the media. And also blocking ICE with her vehicle.
The victim was identified as Renee Nicole Good—the 37-year-old Minneapolis shooting victim.
But please keep jumping up and down on the above. Lolz.
(01-07-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote: Btw, the lady who was killed is from Colorado, had a Missouri license tag, and was in Minnesota.
She was a paid disruptor, and was in the process of notifying residents that ICE was in the area, as said by residents to the media. And also blocking ICE with her vehicle.
We are still allowed to travel without showing our papers.
So you are advocating for executing everyone with out of state plates? Otherwise I’m not sure your point is relevant.
Shooting people that try to hit kill you with a car?
(01-07-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote: Btw, the lady who was killed is from Colorado, had a Missouri license tag, and was in Minnesota.
She was a paid disruptor, and was in the process of notifying residents that ICE was in the area, as said by residents to the media. And also blocking ICE with her vehicle.
We are still allowed to travel without showing our papers.
So you are advocating for executing everyone with out of state plates? Otherwise I’m not sure your point is relevant.
Shooting people that try to hit you with a car?
All damn day
Amazing that you have to explain such basic things to these window lickers
(01-07-2026 07:22 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: Here is the first shot, you can’t see the officer who shoots, but you can see his feet behind the door officer. You can see the cloud of gas from the shot in front of the windshield.
He wasn’t in front of the car when he shot, and the car was turning further away from him.
Second shot, you can’t see he is off to the side because the vehicle momentum carried it further away from him. So definitely not in any danger when he fires the second shot.
And here is the third shot where the car is damn near past him. Definitely in zero danger and still shooting.
Bottom line. She was obstructing legal federal law enforcement. Intentionally. She refused to obey orders and tried to flee. One officer still had his arm in the window. The other one was partially in front of the car.
All she had to do was obey their order and not try to flee. Simple. FAFO. Sorry.
All things that can both be true and not justify her summary execution. The officer clearly wasn’t in danger during the second and third shot, and potentially the first. The justification for the shooting is that his life was in danger by the vehicle, not that she didn’t obey them and he was big mad. I wouldn’t want to try to explain how my life was in danger for shot two and shot three to a jury.