(11-21-2025 11:26 AM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:20 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

Once again. you refuse the path of honesty and try to mask it with a bunch of gibberish. So, what you're saying is that the reason you come down on the side of the Dems 99.99% of the time is simply due to the fact that the Dem side is the side of truth 99.99% of the time.

I realize you think you are super-duper smart and clever, but you really aren't. You're just Tom with a law degree.

Just because you are too dumb to understand something doesn't make it gibberish.

Quiet, piggy

(11-21-2025 11:26 AM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:20 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

Once again. you refuse the path of honesty and try to mask it with a bunch of gibberish. So, what you're saying is that the reason you come down on the side of the Dems 99.99% of the time is simply due to the fact that the Dem side is the side of truth 99.99% of the time.

I realize you think you are super-duper smart and clever, but you really aren't. You're just Tom with a law degree.

Just because you are too dumb to understand something doesn't make it gibberish.

Looks like the drunk patent attorney has a new follower. That's cute.

And many of these issues tanq says that violate all the Constitutional amendments have either already been defeated in Appeals Courts or the Supreme Court with many more pending most of which will go the same way. But still claims victory because the original activist judge appointed by Biden or Obama said they just really didn't like what Trump was doing.

(11-21-2025 12:57 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  And many of these issues tanq says that violate all the Constitutional amendments have either already been defeated in Appeals Courts or the Supreme Court with many more pending most of which will go the same way. But still claims victory because the original activist judge appointed by Biden or Obama said they just really didn't like what Trump was doing.

Yep. TDS is a real mother, well, you-know-what.

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

#ETTD

(11-21-2025 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

#ETTD

You look like a fool when you can't win an argument and put those people on ignore. Someone want to tell him?

(11-21-2025 01:29 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

#ETTD

You look like a fool when you can't win an argument and put those people on ignore. Someone want to tell him?

... being his 'first on ignore', I find it much more entertaining using that 'tool' when directly responding to his posts ...

Charges dropped.

(11-24-2025 12:52 PM)Roxie Wrote:  Charges dropped.

nope

Case dismissed.. Not charges dropped.

(11-24-2025 12:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-24-2025 12:52 PM)Roxie Wrote:  Charges dropped.

nope

The case was dismissed so the charges have to be brought up again aka dropped.

The ruling also mentions that the statute of limitations was not tolled by the invalid indictment meaning the statute of limitations has lapsed.

(11-24-2025 12:57 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-24-2025 12:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-24-2025 12:52 PM)Roxie Wrote:  Charges dropped.

nope

The case was dismissed so the charges have to be brought up again aka dropped.

nope

sounds like you are getting your info from Tanq.

This will get appealed, in which the charges dont have to be brought again. The case was dismissed because the judge said, horribly incorrectly, that the US attorney wasnt correctly appointed.

(11-24-2025 12:57 PM)Roxie Wrote:  

(11-24-2025 12:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-24-2025 12:52 PM)Roxie Wrote:  Charges dropped.

nope

The case was dismissed so the charges have to be brought up again aka dropped.

Wrong..

The case was dismissed without prejudice meaning they could be refiled.

Judges dismiss cases.. Prosecutors drop charges.

(11-24-2025 01:00 PM)Roxie Wrote:  The ruling also mentions that the statute of limitations was not tolled by the invalid indictment meaning the statute of limitations has lapsed.

lulz...cool story bro....

Ah, yes. Activist judges (aka leftist judges) playing partisan politics to protect two of their own. Not surprised.

(11-24-2025 01:08 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-24-2025 01:00 PM)Roxie Wrote:  The ruling also mentions that the statute of limitations was not tolled by the invalid indictment meaning the statute of limitations has lapsed.

lulz...cool story bro....

https://x.com/KlasfeldReports/status/199...bHmyw&s=19
Going to love y'all's tears when the appeal fails as well.

(11-24-2025 01:11 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Ah, yes. Activist judges (aka leftist judges) playing partisan politics to protect two of their own. Not surprised.

The law is never on your side is it. Maybe y'all should learn it.

(11-24-2025 01:00 PM)Roxie Wrote:  The ruling also mentions that the statute of limitations was not tolled by the invalid indictment meaning the statute of limitations has lapsed.

Judge ruled since Halligan was solo in the presentment and sole attorney signing, and since Halligan was improperly in the office —- there legally was no indictment.

No indictment to toll statute of limitations, so SOL has run. And govt is…. Well…. Sol.

Play a stupid game, win a stupid prize. Pays to simply do it the right way and according to the specific manner described at law. Instead of the do it by legal contortions that end up in a ball of ****.

When you deviate from the explicit procedure, you create a big time opportunity that the Comey attorneys took full advantage of.

Good luck lib hacks.

Just delayed until that decision is overturned via appeal.

Lol.