(11-20-2025 08:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

Care to denote the question asked of Comey, and the response of Comey in the matter?

That actually *is* pertinent. As opposed to your kneejerk comments bolded above.

Ill wait for your answer to the above.

So no, I dont know if he is guilty, or not guilty. I do know that the road to prosecute him on this was thin as ****, complete with a memo of declination of prosecution, testimony about horrendously faulty excesses in the indictment process, and a President publicly calling for prosecution. All the above issue facts in the record.

As opposed to your bolded comments that seemingly are an exhibit of ESP wholly missed before by science. That you have convinced yourself, apparently without reference to facts, that he is guilty is an opinion solely of yours, sir.

you mean like the turd nugget that literally ran her campaign on indicting DJT ... how is ol' fanni pack dern these days...

that was a good one there, Hem...

oruvoice ... can't go 209 on this one ... Hem came with the ubiquitous disclaimer again...

Funny, the NY AG cant indict people. You may want to try another swing at that one.

Second, yes -- she said that she would investigate Trump. Ose nose. But again, please make up facts to fit your narrative.

And in all honesty, she shouldnt have made the comment about wishing to investigate Trump.

Here -- we have some fat oaf posting social tweets to his Attorney Geneeral demanding criinal prosecutions. Im glad you are good with that.

(11-20-2025 08:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

Care to denote the question asked of Comey, and the response of Comey in the matter?

That actually *is* pertinent. As opposed to your kneejerk comments bolded above.

Ill wait for your answer to the above.

So no, I dont know if he is guilty, or not guilty. I do know that the road to prosecute him on this was thin as ****, complete with a memo of declination of prosecution, testimony about horrendously faulty excesses in the indictment process, and a President publicly calling for prosecution. All the above issue facts in the record.

As opposed to your bolded comments that seemingly are an exhibit of ESP wholly missed before by science. That you have convinced yourself, apparently without reference to facts, that he is guilty is an opinion solely of yours, sir.

you mean like the turd nugget that literally ran her campaign on indicting DJT ... how is ol' fanni pack dern these days...

that was a good one there, Hem...

oruvoice ... can't go 209 on this one ... Hem came with the ubiquitous disclaimer again...

Funny, the NY AG cant indict people. You may want to try another swing at that one.

Second, yes -- she said that she would investigate Trump. Ose nose. But again, please make up facts to fit your narrative.

And in all honesty, she shouldnt have made the comment about wishing to investigate Trump.

Here -- we have some fat oaf posting social tweets to his Attorney Geneeral demanding criinal prosecutions. Im glad you are good with that.

IDGAF ... I simply want to see him go thru the same treatment whilst goin' broke in the process...

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

Noting problems *fully in the facts in the record* with a state prosecution is now 'lefty talk'? Cool cool punkin.....

I guess being a rightie means sticking your head in the sand when those problems occur. Good look, punkin.... lol.

(11-20-2025 08:50 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 05:01 PM)JRsec Wrote:  He's guilty. You know it. I know it. The nation knows it. At this point it's no longer about justice, and certainly not about innocence or guilt. It's about finding another crooked dodge for a crooked regime.

Care to denote the question asked of Comey, and the response of Comey in the matter?

That actually *is* pertinent. As opposed to your kneejerk comments bolded above.

Ill wait for your answer to the above.

So no, I dont know if he is guilty, or not guilty. I do know that the road to prosecute him on this was thin as ****, complete with a memo of declination of prosecution, testimony about horrendously faulty excesses in the indictment process, and a President publicly calling for prosecution. All the above issue facts in the record.

As opposed to your bolded comments that seemingly are an exhibit of ESP wholly missed before by science. That you have convinced yourself, apparently without reference to facts, that he is guilty is an opinion solely of yours, sir.

you mean like the turd nugget that literally ran her campaign on indicting DJT ... how is ol' fanni pack dern these days...

that was a good one there, Hem...

oruvoice ... can't go 209 on this one ... Hem came with the ubiquitous disclaimer again...

Funny, the NY AG cant indict people. You may want to try another swing at that one.

Second, yes -- she said that she would investigate Trump. Ose nose. But again, please make up facts to fit your narrative.

And in all honesty, she shouldnt have made the comment about wishing to investigate Trump.

Here -- we have some fat oaf posting social tweets to his Attorney Geneeral demanding criinal prosecutions. Im glad you are good with that.

IDGAF ... I simply want to see him go thru the same treatment whilst goin' broke in the process...

Im sure your righteous indignation driven mind does think that is a good thing. Cool cool.

Facts be damned. I dont think I agree with stance you take so stridently.

(11-20-2025 08:50 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

Noting problems *fully in the facts in the record* with a state prosecution is now 'lefty talk'? Cool cool punkin.....

I guess being a rightie means sticking your head in the sand when those problems occur. Good look, punkin.... lol.

Sorry, you can't cute your way out of your political stances, Clarence. You always come down on the side of the Ds. Maybe b/c you hate Trump so much, but the reason doesn't matter. Same result.

(11-20-2025 08:52 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:50 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:30 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Care to denote the question asked of Comey, and the response of Comey in the matter?

That actually *is* pertinent. As opposed to your kneejerk comments bolded above.

Ill wait for your answer to the above.

So no, I dont know if he is guilty, or not guilty. I do know that the road to prosecute him on this was thin as ****, complete with a memo of declination of prosecution, testimony about horrendously faulty excesses in the indictment process, and a President publicly calling for prosecution. All the above issue facts in the record.

As opposed to your bolded comments that seemingly are an exhibit of ESP wholly missed before by science. That you have convinced yourself, apparently without reference to facts, that he is guilty is an opinion solely of yours, sir.

you mean like the turd nugget that literally ran her campaign on indicting DJT ... how is ol' fanni pack dern these days...

that was a good one there, Hem...

oruvoice ... can't go 209 on this one ... Hem came with the ubiquitous disclaimer again...

Funny, the NY AG cant indict people. You may want to try another swing at that one.

Second, yes -- she said that she would investigate Trump. Ose nose. But again, please make up facts to fit your narrative.

And in all honesty, she shouldnt have made the comment about wishing to investigate Trump.

Here -- we have some fat oaf posting social tweets to his Attorney Geneeral demanding criinal prosecutions. Im glad you are good with that.

IDGAF ... I simply want to see him go thru the same treatment whilst goin' broke in the process...

Im sure your righteous indignation driven mind does think that is a good thing. Cool cool.

Facts be damned. I dont think I agree with stance you take so stridently.

I never asked you to agree...

yeah, 'facts be damned' is XACLY! why 91 indictments no longer mean dick ... now it's that lyin' asshat's turn....

(11-20-2025 08:54 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:52 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:50 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  you mean like the turd nugget that literally ran her campaign on indicting DJT ... how is ol' fanni pack dern these days...

that was a good one there, Hem...

oruvoice ... can't go 209 on this one ... Hem came with the ubiquitous disclaimer again...

Funny, the NY AG cant indict people. You may want to try another swing at that one.

Second, yes -- she said that she would investigate Trump. Ose nose. But again, please make up facts to fit your narrative.

And in all honesty, she shouldnt have made the comment about wishing to investigate Trump.

Here -- we have some fat oaf posting social tweets to his Attorney Geneeral demanding criinal prosecutions. Im glad you are good with that.

IDGAF ... I simply want to see him go thru the same treatment whilst goin' broke in the process...

Im sure your righteous indignation driven mind does think that is a good thing. Cool cool.

Facts be damned. I dont think I agree with stance you take so stridently.

I never asked you to agree...

yeah, 'facts be damned' is XACLY! why 91 indictments no longer mean dick ... now it's that lyin' asshat's turn....

Yes -- how DARE *anyone* ever even THINK there might be some **** in the Trump tree. Lolz.

Id suggest battling the 91 indictments and the facts behind those 91 indictments with supportable facts. As opposed to rhetoric. Or I assume just replace that step with vengeance towards anything that gets in the way of that rhetoric.

(11-20-2025 05:28 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(11-17-2025 09:41 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-17-2025 09:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-17-2025 08:16 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(11-17-2025 08:12 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  at this point, we've posted it enough to not have to include such (I'd put it in muh sig with creditation, but there's not enough room ) ... the board knows he taught us ol' dogs a new trick ... I've actually given him props over the past few weeks for finding his 'center of sensei humidor chi' ... that by itself is a nice improvement on his part to 'release those Krakens' ...

the 'chin-chin' of the retardo horsy vid is the only way nuts will reply to ol' missus X moving forward ... at this point, relative to those 'left' in the kettle of sensibility, the only three center lefties I'll give credence with a reply in earnest are Billy Dazzle, mlb, and B0J0 ... at least they share the same frustration towards how the donks have evolved coupled with having a functional brain...

cummy tummy and the kittens is all your doing that I've also embraced ... #pureWin

Retarded running horse giveth and retarded running horse taketh away.

You guys are all missing the point of his avatar. It's a hyper horse's ass on two legs. Hello?

dunno, JR ... here's the vid with lyrics...









Chaka = wheel
Rot = brain rot
Tenuro or Tyro = beginner
chacarron = foolish person

he chose the avatar thinkin' he could troll ... all I see is him defining what he sees in the mirror...

Trolling? That video was posted 17 years ago. I have used the same avatar since shortly after becoming a member of memphistigers.org in 2004. You can do the math. It was years before I ever posted outside of the Main Tiger board. Trolling? Nah unless you call living rent free inside the heads of trolls trolling.

Curious through where do these posts rank on the no personal attacks or off topic guidelines?

Keep them coming though because once in a while when you get new material that has not been , you make me laugh.

(11-20-2025 05:26 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-09-2025 04:10 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I dunno if someone already posted this, but Letitia James has been indicted.

The chickens are coming home to roost...

Or is it another rushed and flawed indictment?

The indictment alleges that the "Second Home Rider" prohibited renting the property, and James violated the terms by renting it out. The defense states that a review of the contract shows the "Second Home Rider" language explicitly allows for renting under specific circumstances. If successful in proving the rider permits rentals, it would call into question a fundamental basis of the indictment, possibly leading to the charges being dismissed.

(11-20-2025 07:32 PM)JRsec Wrote:  LOL! Repeating my post is all you got? That case was about this case. If Comey didn't hide behind corrupt officials appointed by Obama and Biden, then their asses would have been fried by a system doing its job. Instead, they all covered each other's ass and relied on low level appointees to obscure efforts at justice. Everybody knows that too! Trump is no Saint. But neither is he a communist dupe working for Corporate Multi-nationals schmoosing Chi-Nah so they can use child and slave labor to make cheap crap to sell to us. Tariffs were about re-establishing the U.S. manufacturing base or getting some trade equity. Procedures were used against Trump and the brainless media slurping generation who can't do elementary math according UC San Diego's recent study all cheered because they were told to.

Now you are going to hide behind procedures again? It's way past time for both sides to quit trying to game the system and do their work for the people, but wait, the people don't grease their palms like the corporations do. If they worked for us (Dems and Repubs) they would listen more to their constituents. PAC money dwarfs' private donations. So, they now work for people who hire groups of lawyers to play procedural games.

My point? How do you know your party is controlled by corporations? They act like them instead of working to appeal to the citizens in their base. Trump doesn't need corporate money. His problem is that many on the right do need it. And it shows in these last minute betrayals, or perhaps a deliberate mistake regarding procedure. Hell, they are all lawyers.

The interest of the people and the nation, are quite different from the quarterly interests of Corporate Multi-nationals. When the next World War erupts it will be because the interest of this nation differed from those of the multi-nationals that provide the PAC money to buy our government. Their self interest is weakening our resolve. Need proof? I give you the Gulf war. Our troops had to schlog it out door to door in Baghdad. Why? We couldn't bomb the city because of Corporate holdings and properties located there. Whose corporations? Those represented by the alliance. You don't fight wars to preserve corporate interests. You fight them to win or you are sending young people to die for the wrong reason.

It's all FUBAR.

Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neil worked together to get things done for the nation. Those days died when PAC money for political parties was legalized. They want us at each other's throats so we don't pay attention to what their crooked asses do every damn day!

But keep carrying water for the corps backing the Dems. That truly does make you a cuck. Remember Trump may be an ass, but he is a self-made ass who doesn't answer to his corporate overlords which by the way is why he's been shot at twice without anyone really digging deeper than the patsies set up to accept the blame, one of which was conveniently killed while an incompetent Secret Service team stood around with their thumbs up their asses. They picked a pitiful kid to be the patsy. The shot was too close to being in the forehead to be the work of a kid who had only been shooting for a couple of weeks. Trump turned his head at just the right moment not to be killed. Nobody gets away with that unless they have some serious internal support which requires some considerable money.

It's past time to get big business out of government. If we can't then we are fascists whether we wear blue or red. And we can't do that as long as idiots on both sides believe the lies they are told daily. But you have to know how things work to know when you are lied to, and this generation, my grandchildren included, were never taught how things should work, why they should work that way, and what they would lose if they weren't. Government doesn't need to ride roughshod over business, but business should never buy a government to its bidding either. Keeping them apart was deliberate because it was the only way to ensure the rights of the individual and safeguard the freedoms promised in something else you haven't been taught, The Constitution. The Constitution is what we swear an oath to defend, not Government.

Ultimately that oath is implied to mean we protect each other because by protecting rights for all, we do. It's about damn time we got this straight again!

Jr- we can find some common ground on the role of corporate and FOREIGN GOVT actors meddling in our federal government. I’d be a single issue voter for anyone that would sign up for term limits and to overturn Citizens United with legislation. (And remember citizens United is a conservative Trump affiliated organization). Trump has accepted ~half a billion in gifts from foreign govt since coming back to office. He’s accepted lavish gifts from the largest corporations also. Trump is as beholden to corporate interests as anyone else (great source of graft). Larry Fink (Blackrock ceo) was one of his money managers, Scott Bessent was a partner with George Soros, Lutnick ran one of the largest investment banks in the world. There’s a reason all the FAANG companies and Elon are regularly attending white house dinners and giving Trump shiny things, and it’s not because they want to bring back American manufacturing.
The problem with Trump is he’s not just taking corporate bribes, he’s taking giant sums of money from foreign actors, most of which are allied to China, while greenlighting sensitive technology deals with them. Trump affiliated, wholly owned, or family members have made at least $3B since he took office. Don’t see a problem with this? But muh Hunter. Democrats are just as guilty as republicans of sucking on the corporate teat

Most of the rest of your post is typical boomer peddling of propaganda and lionizing diaper don. A self made man? Looolllll. That was a good one. Imo you should ask why Trump is not pushing the DOJ to investigate his assassination attempts more. Remember his miraculous healing ear?

Anyway keep up the good energy on the corpos and foreign government influence. We can agree there. I don’t know how you square that with your loyalty to Trump but I guess small victories

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

But again, you don't care, AMIRITE?

(11-21-2025 09:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

But again, you don't care, AMIRITE?

I don't care which side he's on. I find it amusing that he lands on the left so often, and denies it.

I would have exactly the same reaction if he landed on the right most of the time and denied that, too. I find that weird.

Of course, I don't expect you to understand the difference.

You claim you're not a Dem or an Indy, yet you come down on the D side 100%. Birds of a feather, lol.

(11-21-2025 10:28 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 09:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

But again, you don't care, AMIRITE?

I don't care which side he's on. I find it amusing that he lands on the left so often, and denies it.

I would have exactly the same reaction if he landed on the right most of the time and denied that, too. I find that weird.

Of course, I don't expect you to understand the difference.

You claim you're not a Dem or an Indy, yet you come down on the D side 100%. Birds of a feather, lol.

1,000%! It's not that you clowns are lefties. It's the fact that you are, yet do everything you can to deny it. Honesty goes a long way with most folks.

It apparently isn't a big thing for others.

(11-21-2025 10:28 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 09:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

But again, you don't care, AMIRITE?

I don't care which side he's on. I find it amusing that he lands on the left so often, and denies it.

I would have exactly the same reaction if he landed on the right most of the time and denied that, too. I find that weird.

Of course, I don't expect you to understand the difference.

You claim you're not a Dem or an Indy, yet you come down on the D side 100%. Birds of a feather, lol.

AGAIN, you often think he's coming down on a side when in fact he's just stating facts...which you often seem oblivious too. That's your issue, not his.

Lastly, I've explained this multiple times. Not being a member of the democratic party in no way means that my views as a liberal aren't going to align with their views for the most part.

I loathe political parties and blame them for much of our division and issues. So, no, I don't belong to one.

(11-21-2025 11:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 10:28 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 09:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2025 08:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That's another one, Clarence. Coming down on the side of the lefties.

But again, you don't care, AMIRITE?

I don't care which side he's on. I find it amusing that he lands on the left so often, and denies it.

I would have exactly the same reaction if he landed on the right most of the time and denied that, too. I find that weird.

Of course, I don't expect you to understand the difference.

You claim you're not a Dem or an Indy, yet you come down on the D side 100%. Birds of a feather, lol.

AGAIN, you often think he's coming down on a side when in fact he's just stating facts...which you often seem oblivious too. That's your issue, not his.

Lastly, I've explained this multiple times. Not being a member of the democratic party in no way means that my views as a liberal aren't going to align with their views for the most part.

I loathe political parties and blame them for much of our division and issues. So, no, I don't belong to one.

Just stating facts. Independent.

Thanks for the laughs.

I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

Once again. you refuse the path of honesty and try to mask it with a bunch of gibberish. So, what you're saying is that the reason you come down on the side of the Dems 99.99% of the time is simply due to the fact that the Dem side is the side of truth 99.99% of the time.

I realize you think you are super-duper smart and clever, but you really aren't. You're just Tom with a law degree.

(11-21-2025 11:20 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

Once again. you refuse the path of honesty and try to mask it with a bunch of gibberish. So, what you're saying is that the reason you come down on the side of the Dems 99.99% of the time is simply due to the fact that the Dem side is the side of truth 99.99% of the time.

I realize you think you are super-duper smart and clever, but you really aren't. You're just Tom with a law degree.

Malignant narcissist is the term you are looking for

(11-21-2025 11:20 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-21-2025 11:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m impressed that the only yardstick of left / right from the howler twerps is Trump-based.

If folks want to call a stance for limited Federal government power, limited Executive power, a wish to merely look at the legal basis for a continued armed conflict, a factual backed assessment of a horribly flawed politically driven indictment, support for the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment, opposition to EOs that facially violate 1st amendment rights, opposition to fiat EOs that specifically target political opposition and opposition groups by name, EOs that try to exert Federal oversight of private and state universities, critical of exercising emergency powers to place Art 10 armed forces into the city streets of America as ‘left’ — let the howler twerps chant that.

Most of the time taking the above positions was a bedrock of the right. Apparently not so these days. The entire issue of ‘right’ seems to be in flux due to the emergence of the howler twerp types.

Cool cool.

Once again. you refuse the path of honesty and try to mask it with a bunch of gibberish. So, what you're saying is that the reason you come down on the side of the Dems 99.99% of the time is simply due to the fact that the Dem side is the side of truth 99.99% of the time.

I realize you think you are super-duper smart and clever, but you really aren't. You're just Tom with a law degree.

Just because you are too dumb to understand something doesn't make it gibberish.